- Nov 23, 2012
- 15,017
- 4,990
(Post deleted. Response to a deleted post. Obadiah)
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
But that is simply not what the text says, unless there has been a translation error, and I am certainly open to this possibility but I thinks the odds of such an error are slim to none. Here it is again with appropriate emphasis:We know the works of the believer effect in no way eternal life, but rather manifests eternal life has been received, which can only be effected by faith in Christ's redemptive work.
This passage completely defies that theory:In verse 9 Paul showed he was convinced that the Hebrew believers he was speaking to were beyond that of rejecting Christ, but felt he needed to mention what he had to them concerning the unbelievers, so they would be careful to identify them, this is what is meant by "though we thus speak," i.e. I know you believe in the Lord Jesus but I still wanted to speak to you about the others who do not (in which some were probably among the believers and hearing this).
So, back in Heb 2:9, then, Jesus was only "trying" or "sampling" when He "tasted death for all"? The same word for "taste" in 2:9 is found in 6:4. I recall John MacArthur once quipped that those in ch 6 tasted as in "licking an ice cream cone". Apparently he was as ignorant of the fact that the same word was used in 2:9 as in 6:4 as FW Grant was.
Mat 13:20, 21What source indicates that it means to leave something that one was merely "interested in but never accepted"?
We just understand it differently Brother. I see it that he is speaking to those he certain will not "fall away," etc. "But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation" (v 9).This passage completely defies that theory:
23 Let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful.
26 If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.
29 How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?
(Hebrews 10:23,26-27,29 NASB)
The warning to not fall away is given directly to "us (who) hold unswervingly to the hope we profess" and to those who have been sanctified by the blood of Christ. He's speaking directly to those who are presently holding unswervingly to the hope of Christ, but who are apparently in danger of abandoning their hope, their faith in Christ. And the penalty for doing so is clearly spelled out. He is not speaking to people who never believed.
True it is, and many there are! (Isa 29:13; Mat 15:8; Mark 7:6)Some will argue that to profess Christ is one thing, while to possess him is another.
And so I ask, why does the author want them to hold fast to a false profession?:
No, no, no.Satan, the tempter in the flesh, that condemns believers, will continue to "try" to condemn believers and will say that what Christ has wrought, did not happen and is not sufficient.
No, no, no.
Believers are not condemned.
This warning was written to believers, not unbelievers:
Also, he is a continual reminder of how Christians should talk to other people, something I need and appreciate in him.
This appears to be a turnabout of your long standing claims that they might be.
I don't see the concept of "partial experience" in the word. If one eats an entire ice cream cone, or only licks it, he has experienced exactly and fully what the flavor of the ice cream is. I'm not even sure what a "partial experience" would mean.Hi FG - Pretty good reply and thanks for your input. Nearly all words have more than one meaning, that's why establishing the context determines the meaning of the contents in view.
Lexicon :: Strong's G1089 - geuomai
γεύομαι
Transliteration
geuomai
Pronunciation
gyü'-o-mī taste (12x), eat (3x).
Outline of Biblical Usage
to taste, to try the flavour of
i.e. perceive the flavour of, partake of, enjoy
to feel, make trial of, experience
to take food, eat, to take nourishment, eat
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/Lexicon/Lexicon.cfm?strongs=G1089&t=KJV
In my opinion, the Greek for "taste" has a definitive to the concept of something not only being temporal, but also that of a partial experience.
Actually, He most assuredly did fully experience the "second death", which is separation from God. We know that by what He said on the cross: "My God, My God, why have you forsaken Me?" During His time on the cross and while He was fully experiencing this separation from His Father, He was paying the penalty for the sins of mankind. This was no partial thing, nor only a temporal thing. His physical death following His real separation from His Father added nothing to His work on the cross. Which is why He dismissed His spirit when His work was finished (Jn 19:30). When there was nothing more to do, He had no more reason to remain on this earth, so He voluntarily and actively dismissed His spirit.In the case of the Lord Jesus' taste of death, it was temporal (to try; make trial of) for He did not need to experience the full capacity of death, which is the eternal "the second death."
I respectfully disagree.Thus tasting "the heavenly gift" and the good Word of God (Heb 6:4, 5) is what insincere professors-only fall from, hence the avoidance of any permanency in their walk and eventually in their life, which becomes obvious to them and others later.
As well to you and yours!God’s blessings to your Family
What verse in the Bible teaches that any believer can or has become an unbeliever and is called such from the Bible? There are none. That is only an erroneous opinion, not Scripturally sound.He has always stated that believers who later turn away from God have become unbelievers.
He has always stated that believers who later turn away from God have become unbelievers.
It is also relevant to note that unbelief and disobedience are the same word and are used interchangeably.
See Hebrews 4:6 NKJV and KJV
Disobedience, that is to say, those who stop obeying the Gospel, are those who stop believing the Gospel.
No, like usual you and others simply can't hear the argument being presented because of the power of indoctrinations that make it so that even what we hear in opposition to our favorite indoctrinations can only be heard according to that indoctrination.This appears to be a turnabout of your long standing claims that they might be.
No, like usual you and others simply can't hear the argument being presented because of the power of indoctrinations that make it so that even what we hear in opposition to our favorite indoctrinations can only be heard according to that indoctrination.
So, listen carefully: The argument is that believers BECOME unbelievers and are THEN condemned.
What verse in the Bible teaches that any believer can or has become an unbeliever and is called such from the Bible? There are none. That is only an erroneous opinion, not Scripturally sound.