I
Imagican
Guest
Is it just me or do any others recognize the direction that 'Christianity' has taken in our time?
It seems that 'religion' has become more important than the truth now days. That those that proclaim 'Christianity' as their faith are bound by the same 'Political Correctness' as subjects such as 'race' and 'sexuality', etc.......That there have 'crept in' those that would contain the truth in a bubble of descretion that would alter the 'truth itself'.
Most seem content in a discussion concerning ANYTHING other than those subjects that SEEM to be most important. Talk around issues but avoid stating ANYTHING that may offend ANY even though it may well be the TRUTH.
I wonder where our understanding would lie if those that offered us instruction from the beginning had been SO CONSTRAINED in their ability to tell us The Truth.
We can see Paul's struggle to offer truth without offense. Stuck between a desire to love and instruct his brothers and sisters but constrained by a fear that some may well take offense. Must have been a difficult job.
But we DON'T see compromise to the point that the truth 'ceased to exist' simply for the sake of those unable or unwilling to accept it.
The people threatned to stone Christ and His apostles on numerous occasion for speaking truth. Eventually nailing Him to a cross. Have we learned NOTHING from the example? Or are we to simply repeat this process over and over again?
I am of a firm belief that there is ONLY ONE TRUTH. Either something conforms to that which we have been offered or it doesn't. But it would seem that there are many that would choose to compromise to the point that there is NO 'set truth'. That truth is what WE make it and there can be MANY 'different' truths. I wonder............
One thread was titled: Are you Chicken? Instead of discussing issues of our ability or inability to 'step up' and offer testimony when we are called, it may have been better served to encourage others to 'step up' and follow 'truth' REGARDLESS of the consequences. For NO amount of 'religion' is able to offer ANYTHING of substance without FIRST knowing and following the 'truth'.
So, is Political Correctness of more significance than offering that which may well be able to transend the meager understanding of men? Or, for the sake of offending 'some', should we simple stiffle that 'part of the truth' that may well NOT agree with their understanding?
Blessings,
MEC
It seems that 'religion' has become more important than the truth now days. That those that proclaim 'Christianity' as their faith are bound by the same 'Political Correctness' as subjects such as 'race' and 'sexuality', etc.......That there have 'crept in' those that would contain the truth in a bubble of descretion that would alter the 'truth itself'.
Most seem content in a discussion concerning ANYTHING other than those subjects that SEEM to be most important. Talk around issues but avoid stating ANYTHING that may offend ANY even though it may well be the TRUTH.
I wonder where our understanding would lie if those that offered us instruction from the beginning had been SO CONSTRAINED in their ability to tell us The Truth.
We can see Paul's struggle to offer truth without offense. Stuck between a desire to love and instruct his brothers and sisters but constrained by a fear that some may well take offense. Must have been a difficult job.
But we DON'T see compromise to the point that the truth 'ceased to exist' simply for the sake of those unable or unwilling to accept it.
The people threatned to stone Christ and His apostles on numerous occasion for speaking truth. Eventually nailing Him to a cross. Have we learned NOTHING from the example? Or are we to simply repeat this process over and over again?
I am of a firm belief that there is ONLY ONE TRUTH. Either something conforms to that which we have been offered or it doesn't. But it would seem that there are many that would choose to compromise to the point that there is NO 'set truth'. That truth is what WE make it and there can be MANY 'different' truths. I wonder............
One thread was titled: Are you Chicken? Instead of discussing issues of our ability or inability to 'step up' and offer testimony when we are called, it may have been better served to encourage others to 'step up' and follow 'truth' REGARDLESS of the consequences. For NO amount of 'religion' is able to offer ANYTHING of substance without FIRST knowing and following the 'truth'.
So, is Political Correctness of more significance than offering that which may well be able to transend the meager understanding of men? Or, for the sake of offending 'some', should we simple stiffle that 'part of the truth' that may well NOT agree with their understanding?
Blessings,
MEC