Are Women Moral Leaders?

[Chopper]

That sentence makes no sense.
But I would guess it means when a men comes into your house as a guest you'd have to treat him as higher than your family.

Now I can't imagine offering your virgin daughters as a sacrifice to get raped was righteous even under those circumstances. Otherwise the angels wouldn't have prevented that, because why prevent something righteous? Maybe if he'd offered himself as a sacrifice to the thugs that would have been noble.
But even if the moral qualities of Lot himself are out of question.
The entire reasoning of the OP is bizarre. Neither is Lot's wife a represantant of womankind in general. Nor is her behaviour particularly immoral compared to other men or women in the Bible. Some women are presented as role models to other women or even to men in the Bible.
Nor does the Bible ever say women are incapable of moral judgement or incapable to walk away from sin because of their emotions or whatever.

The OP is purely misogynic.

Right Claudya, I think he never read about Ruth and Esther and Dorcas. Hmmmm.

 

[jasoncran]

Right Claudya, I think he never read about Ruth and Esther and Dorcas. Hmmmm.

ah never mind. I posted the idea of the guests for sukhot, hospitality, why would that be so important? the idea where is that lot is called righteous. why would peter call him that if lot was so vile that he would sacrifice his daughter for his skin?

 

[WIP]

So as an intelligent woman, should Iook for a dumb man?
That would make things a lot easier in our marriage, as long as he'd admit that I'm cleverer. :yes

What are you suggesting? My wife is the intelligent one?