[_ Old Earth _] Atheists/scientists and God

[Classik]

Well? Did the team you were rooting for win? I figure that would be a question that one wouldn't have to jossle words around to have the upper hand

Defeated Celtic at the end. They scored first and Andrés Iniesta equalised. FC Barcelona 1:1 Celtic. Just few seconds to the final whistle Jordi Alba scored our winning goal. I was long dead...but that final goal, that last straw that broke the camel's back...resurrected me. I'm alive again. Maybe I could have disappearad. Tears of joy.4

 

[stovebolts]

Defeated Celtic at the end. They scored first and Andrés Iniesta equalised. FC Barcelona 1:1 Celtic. Just few seconds to the final whistle Jordi Alba scored our winning goal. I was long dead...but that final goal, that last straw that broke the camel's back...resurrected me. I'm alive again. Maybe I could have disappearad. Tears of joy.4

awesome!!

 

[Classik]

awesome!!

Borussia Dortmund vs Real Madrid going on now!!!

 

[The Unbeliever]

Now I know you are a worldclass comedian! The reason I asked you to define 'most' knowing you were close to forming your own opinion. I already told you 'what', comedian. :D. And when you say 'Majority' or borrowing your own language 'most', does it include your acquaintances, the people you've had or have dealings with etc? Or you think I go about converting them? And before you start another humor reread the posts above. You just made me shriek with laughter. Thumbsup for your sense of humor.

I had already formed my opinion. I even gave my opinion. Your acquaintances do not equal most or majority.

...And how I wish you had attempted answering the OP and giving your own opinion.

I did. You must be trying to be funny like me.

 

[Classik]

Borussia Dortmund vs Real Madrid going on now!!!

Madrid lost: 2:1

 

[cupid dave]

Would it be right to say atheists or scientist atheists ignorantly/(or unknowingly)study the handwork of God:

i. (and probably misinterpreting or representing them or
ii. partially representing or interpreting them)?

They actually collaterate Genesis verse by verse in spite that by now, the church people twited what Genesis says into so many surrealistic and irrational explanations because they had no idea about the actual Truth.

For instnace, the YECs tryto say the Universe is only 6000 years old because they forget that the 24 hour day was not even around at first.
They just assumed that the first seven durations were Earh Days, in spite that the Earth, during the first duration was void as a sphere, and actually a spinning disk of rocks that took millennia to congeal:





The hot spinning molten matter that was to coalesce into the planet Earth WAS without form:

Gen. 1:2 And the earth was without form, (a spinning cloud of molten matter and gases), and void: (not valid as a sphere yet- i.e.; an accretion disk), and darkness: [choshek: obscurity] was upon the face (of the disk) of the deep: [tehowm: the deep primeval abyss of the thick ring].
And (the great Shechinah), the spirit, (the pan-en-theistic Natural Laws) of God moved upon the face: [paniym: presence] of the "waters" (i.e.; of these transitory things spinning counter clockwise around the Sun: [mayim: Hebrew])


http://kofh2u.tripod.com/id132.html