Let me put it differently: Do you think forgiveness is what leads directly to sins being washed away?
If one wants forgiveness, baptism for the remission of past sins is necessary for that forgiveness.
Of course no sins will be entering heaven, but that has nothing to do with water baptism.
The only way to rid one of past sins is by baptism in Christ's name. (Acts 2:38)
How? Do you think sins, which are not physical, just sit on the surface of the skin and so can be washed away by water?
Nope, that would be the OT's approach.
Past sins are washed away by our "immersion" into Christ and His death.
It is His blood that cleanses one of past sins.
Not at all. Again, Peter makes the clear argument that it is Jesus's death and resurrection that save, not water baptism. Note that sins are not physical and do not just sit on the surface of the skin so that they can be washed away by water. Removal of sin is a spiritual act, by the Holy Spirit, based on the death and resurrection of Jesus, which is what saves.
Baptism facilitates our immersion into Christ's death.
That is where His shed blood washes us.
It's based on what the NT teaches on baptism.
If that were true, then you would be able to show at least one scripture showing a man being baptized to show the crowd of one's conversion.
No, at least not according to what you think Peter's POV is. You're completely ignoring what text plainly states:
Tit 3:5 he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, (ESV)
You emboldened the wrong part of the verse.
The washing of regeneration, baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of past sins, allows our participation in Christ's death, burial, and resurrection.
Our being raised with Christ to walk in newness of life is the end result of baptism. (Rom 6:4)
The "washing of regeneration and renewal" is an act of the Holy Spirit, not water; water symbolizes what has been done by the Spirit.
The baptism and the Holy Ghost are one. (1 John 5:8)..."And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.'
Don't be sorry; I have the correct understanding, or at least more correct. You're clearly, again, ignoring the plain meaning of the text:
Tit 3:5 he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, (ESV)
Again you emboldened the wrong part of the verse...in the context of washing away past sins and also rebirth.
Perhaps you would prefer the KJV:
Tit 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
I like that..."Not by works of righteousness which we have done,
but according to his mercy he saved us,
by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
It requires both a washing by the blood of Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit.
It would be ineffective without both.
This is any and all righteous works, period. There are absolutely no works which save (justify) us. This is supported by "but according to his mercy he saved us." There is simply no way around it--no works save us; they are completely ruled out. That is the consistent message throughout the NT. To teach otherwise means such a person is to be considered accursed. To persist in believing and teaching that error puts one outside the gospel and outside of Christ.
I will maintain that obedience to God is necessary for salvation.
He commands repentance from sin and baptism in His name for the remission of past sins...do these two things and you will receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. (Act 2:38)
The works of the Law that Paul wrote against though, will not save.
But, this comes down a serious problem that seems to persist on these forums--a near complete lack of understanding of how the NT talks about salvation as a past event (justification and sanctification), an ongoing reality (sanctification), and a future fulfillment (glorification). That is contributing to much confusion and differences in understanding in this thread.
They all occur at once, at baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of past sins.
That is where we are in contact with His atoning, sanctifying, justifying, consecrating blood.
Water baptism saves no one. And to say that I am "diminishing" or even "outlawing" baptism and countermanding "Jesus' commandments" means you haven't understood me very well at all.
No man will be saved without remission of past sins, and baptism in Jesus' name is how that baptism is to be done.
May I ask, which church it is that teaches your doctrine ?