Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

Book of Revelation Written by John around 96AD

2024 Website Hosting Fees

Total amount
$1,048.00
Goal
$1,038.00

for_his_glory

Fight the good fight of faith
2024 Supporter
John the Apostle was born around 6 AD Bethsaida, Galilee, providence of the Roman Empire and died around the age of 100 in Ephesus, a providence of the Roman Empire. The first Christian community in Ephesus was established by John around 64AD after Paul was decapitated outside the city wall of Rome, John again became the leader of the Ephesians church community four years before Nero died.

By the dates of these to Emperors below Nero was the older sibling and after he died Titus Flavius Domitianus began to reign in his place.

Roman Emperor Titus Flavius Domitianus who reigned from 81AD - 96AD was the Emperor who exiled the Apostle John to the isle of Patmos around 95AD. While on the isle of Patmos John wrote letters to the seven churches in Asia Minor as these compiled letters make up the book of Revelation.

By the dates below we can clearly see that it was not Nero that exiled John to the isle of Patmos nor was the Roman Emperor at that time.

Domitian, Latin in full Caesar Domitianus Augustus, original name (until ad 81) Titus Flavius Domitianus, (born Oct. 24, ad 51—died Sept. 18, ad 96, Rome [Italy]), Roman emperor (ad 81–96), known chiefly for the reign of terror under which prominent members of the Senate lived during his last years.


Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (/ˈnɪəroʊ/ NEER-oh; born Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus; 15 December AD 37 – 9 June AD 68), was the fifth Roman emperor and final emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, reigning from AD 54 until his death in AD 68. He was adopted by the Roman emperor Claudius at the age of 13 and succeeded him on the throne. Nero was popular with the members of his Praetorian Guard and lower-class commoners in Rome and its provinces. He committed suicide around the at age 30.

It was not Nero who received a deadly wound as he commited suicide. It was the Old Roman Empire that received what seemed to be a deadly wound back in 1798 by General Berthier who made his entrance into Rome and abolished the Roman government and established a secular one. That caused them to scatter into the other ten nations (ten horns). The wound was healed in 1929 by Mussolini.

Rev 13; Rev 17:8 What was, was Roman rule from 538 AD with Emperor Justinian’s decree and under the military protection of Belisarius until the deadly wound, was not, came in 1798 by General Berthier who made his entrance into Rome and abolished the Roman government and established a secular one. This was the time when Rome persecuted the Christians and killed them which were approximately 500 million people slain for the cause of their faith in Jesus. In 1801 Napoleon made an agreement with Pope Pius II establishing Napoleon’s Organic Articles of granting the Tribunal and the Corps legislative partial control of the concordat in order to help the state monitor any politically harmful Catholic or Protestant movements or activities. The wound was largely healed in 1929 when Mussolini gave the Vatican back to the Pope and established it as a country in it's own right in the Lateran Treaty.

FUTURISM
Click on The Catholic Origins of Futurism and Preterism - Customer Portal

Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) was a Jesuit doctor of theology, born in Spain, who began writing a lengthy (500 page) commentary in 1585 on the book of Revelation (Apocalypse) titled In Sacrum Beati Ioannis Apostoli, & Evangelistiae Apocalypsin Commentarij, and published it about the year 1590. He died in 1591 at the age of fifty-four, so he was not able to expand on his work or write any other commentaries on Revelation. In order to remove the Catholic Church from consideration as the antichrist power, Ribera proposed that the first few chapters of the Apocalypse applied to ancient pagan Rome, and the rest he limited to a yet future period of 3 1/2 literal years, immediately prior to the second coming. During that time, the Roman Catholic Church would have fallen away from the pope into apostasy. Then, he proposed, the antichrist, a single individual, would:
Persecute and blaspheme the saints of God.
Rebuild the temple in Jerusalem.
Abolish the Christian religion.
Deny Jesus Christ.
Be received by the Jews.
Pretend to be God.
Kill the two witnesses of God.
Conquer the world.

So, according to Ribera, the 1260 days and 42 months and 3 1/2 times of prophecy were not 1260 years, but a literal 3 1/2 years, and therefore none of the book of Revelation had any application to the middle ages or the papacy, but to the future, to a period immediately prior to the second coming, hence the name Futurism. Ribera was one of many Jesuit apologist just like Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, Manuel De Lacunza to name a few who wrote books trying to remove the Roman Catholic Church from consideration as the antichrist power.
 
Italy was unified before mussolini.there was a king before and after il duce .il duce abdicated and was excuted the exiked king returned to power and we have the italy at present .


1918 ,Victor Emmanuel the third ,twas his dad who unified the country and made it the Kingdom of Italy
 
I appreciate information such as the above. What extra-Biblical resources do you enjoy? Or, what resources do you use to extract such information?

Thank you! :)
I just mainly look up Biblical history of dates and times like when John was born, how old he was when he was exiled to the isle of Patmos as a prisoner for preaching the word and how old he was when he wrote his letters to the seven churches in Asia.
 
I just mainly look up Biblical history of dates and times like when John was born, how old he was when he was exiled to the isle of Patmos as a prisoner for preaching the word and how old he was when he wrote his letters to the seven churches in Asia.
So you mean like . . . Google? :)
 
Italy was unified before mussolini.there was a king before and after il duce .il duce abdicated and was excuted the exiked king returned to power and we have the italy at present .


1918 ,Victor Emmanuel the third ,twas his dad who unified the country and made it the Kingdom of Italy
Actually Vatican City State is an independent city-state, microstate and enclave within Rome, Italy.

 
Actually Vatican City State is an independent city-state, microstate and enclave within Rome, Italy.

You said Roman empire .that list mentioned Italy .the papacy uhm never died .it was in Roma since the crusades and before . It's just wasn't under its own country.a tiny few blocks is hardly an empire .

I also do photo and explore church history .I have mainly to churches here that are pre 1910 that I photographed.they are In the same diocese now .
 
While I don't disagree with the late date ,I do think the beast will be from isreal not Rome .

The rcc has money but hardly has power close to steer like it once did with kings .
 
“It was written in Patmos about A.D. 68, whither John had been banished by Domitius Nero, as stated in the title of the Syria version of the book; and with this concurs the express statement of Irenaeus in A.D. 175, who says it happened in the reign of Domitianou – i.e., Domitius (Nero).”

The entire historical position of futurists is one word, Domitius, which they assume is not Nero being unaware that this actually was a name for Nero.

Besides the above,The INTERNAL evidence is he wrote it before the Fall of Jerusalem.

1. The temple was still standing at the time of writing.

2. John wound have been 90 years old and at 90, John no longer could walk or even speak much. He was not a threat.

3. Jesus told John that he (John) would still travel and have a ministry. (John had none at the time.) This as impossible in 96AD but not at all in 60 something AD.

4. The tribes of Israel were still intact in 60 AD. They were no longer tribes after the temple with is records were destroyed.

5. The book says it was written so that those about to go through this would UNDERSTAND. They did and it was for them. In 96AD NO ONE would have understood same as today for futurists.

6. He repeatedly wrote it happening soon. In 96 ADit hasn’t happened yet, another untruth in the book.

The above is from memory nit looking it up except the quote. As I said, the “external evidence”is largely based in assumption and it the writing on ONE uninformed man.

Those receiving that book knew it was for them and the events that followed the details in astounding accuracy and an historicist was there in the spot recording it. The fact that futurists do not understand the book is evidence that it is not for them other than fulfilled prophesy (not completely fulfilled of course) is for everyone in general.
 
Last edited:
How do we know the Book of Revelation was written by the apostle John and not some other John?
 
“It was written in Patmos about A.D. 68, whither John had been banished by Domitius Nero, as stated in the title of the Syria version of the book; and with this concurs the express statement of Irenaeus in A.D. 175, who says it happened in the reign of Domitianou – i.e., Domitius (Nero).”

The entire historical position of futurists is one word, Domitius, which they assume is not Nero being unaware that this actually was a name for Nero.

Besides the above,The INTERNAL evidence is he wrote it before the Fall of Jerusalem.

1. The temple was still standing at the time of writing.

2. John wound have been 90 years old and at 90, John no longer could walk or even speak much. He was not a threat.

3. Jesus told John that he (John) would still travel and have a ministry. (John had none at the time.) This as impossible in 96AD but not at all in 60 something AD.

4. The tribes of Israel were still intact in 60 AD. They were no longer tribes after the temple with is records were destroyed.

5. The book says it was written so that those about to go through this would UNDERSTAND. They did and it was for them. In 96AD NO ONE would have understood same as today for futurists.

6. He repeatedly wrote it happening soon. In 96 ADit hasn’t happened yet, another untruth in the book.

The above is from memory nit looking it up except the quote. As I said, the “external evidence”is largely based in assumption and it the writing on ONE uninformed man.

Those receiving that book knew it was for them and the events that followed the details in astounding accuracy and an historicist was there in the spot recording it. The fact that futurists do not understand the book is evidence that it is not for them other than fulfilled prophesy (not completely fulfilled of course) is for everyone in general.
This has nothing to do with Nero who was born Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus in 37AD who died in 68AD at the age of 30 as he commited suicide. This is not about Preterist or Futurist so please do not go there as this is about what has already been written in history and found in many history books like the Britannica, World History Encyclopedia.

I'm talking about Roman Emperor Titus Flavius Domitianus who reigned from 81AD - 96AD, not talking about Nero who wasn't even around before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. John traveled to Ephesus between 38AD and 47AD and if I am correct he never traveled to Rome as he stayed in Ephesus, which was a Roman providence, but not Rome.
 
How do we know the Book of Revelation was written by the apostle John and not some other John?
Was there another Apostle John? The only ones who wrote the books of the Bible were Prophets and Apostles.
 
This has nothing to do with Nero who was born Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus in 37AD who died in 68AD at the age of 30 as he commited suicide. This is not about Preterist or Futurist so please do not go there as this is about what has already been written in history and found in many history books like the Britannica, World History Encyclopedia.
I am not. But you stated as though it were fact something that is not at all fact. John was not exiled at 90 to Patmos. He was in his early 60s or late 50s and was still a vital man. It is the futurists who insist it was written after the fall of Jerusalem for their eschatological purposes. Because it is in wikipedia or any book does not make it so. They could write that Jesus was a myth and that would not make it so. John was feeble in his 90s and could not even walk.
I'm talking about Roman Emperor Titus Flavius Domitianus who reigned from 81AD - 96AD, not talking about Nero who wasn't even around before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. John traveled to Ephesus between 38AD and 47AD and if I am correct he never traveled to Rome as he stayed in Ephesus, which was a Roman providence, but not Rome.
Nero exiled John to Patmos after boiling him in oil as well as had Peter and Paul killed around the same time. That is what some records of the time say. There is only one person who wrote it was Domitius and futurists have interpreted that as later for theological reasons. That John traveled to Ephesus as well as other places in decades before does not matter. He was exiled to Patmos under Nero. The revelation he received was sent to the churches because they were about to experience the worst persecution ever by any people as the enemy was allowed to defeat them for 3.5 years whereby many of them would be killed. The Christians came out of Jerusalem remembering the prophetic words of Jesus and avoided destruction.

If you want to talk historical events, then please do not try to silence those who disagree with your view by insisting no particular theology is allowed. We are talking what happened in history and the evidence for John writing Revelation 60-68 AD is stronger than Encyclopedia Britannica. I know the majority have been taught it was later but that is due to good publicity and not good scholarship. The man was not in his 90s ministering still in churches in the world.
 
Last edited:
How do we know the Book of Revelation was written by the apostle John and not some other John?
We know that the apostle John was excited to Patmos and we know that he died a natural death in his 90s. It fits. There is no reason to suspect another John.
 
Back
Top