yeah,..
Let's try something....
OK.
I'LL USE CAPITALS TO SEPARATE MY COMMENTS FROM YOURS BELOW.
And I'll use red lettering to follow up on your responses.
I've looked back on this thread to find some of your "best evidence" for your claim.
Pop quiz time.
The Urim and Thummim are 5 stones in the shape of a tetrahedron and 4 octants that, when placed together, form a cube because:
a. an ephod is "foursquare"
NO... THE BREASTPLATE IS FOUR SQUARE.
A non-point. The breastplate being foursquare does not support the idea that the Urim and Thummim is a cube.
b. sukkah are cube shaped,
NO, THE SUKKAH ARE IDEALLY 7x7, HAVE A LATTICE ROOF THAT CAN BE SEEN THRU, CAN NOT BE HIGHER THAT THE CIELING OF THE MOST HOLY CUBE SHAPED ROOM IN THE TABERNACLE, 2O C.
HENCE, IS RELATED TO THAT GEOMETRY.
Another non-point. Nothing links this shape the the Urim and Thummim.
c. lulav etrog sets come with 5 peices
THE LULAVG/ETROG ARE SYMBOLIC OF THIS URIM AND THUMMIM AND THERE IS NOT OTHER RATIONAL REASON FOR IT.
There is no rational reason to assume that there is any symbolism related to the Urim and Thummim here.
d. Buckminster Fuller has shown how a cube can be divided into 5 shapes.
NO.
BUCKMINISTER FULLER, INDEPENDENTLY, DESCRIBED EXACTLY THE SAME GEOMETRIC CUBE. HE WROTE "Cosmography,
the one thing that explains everything,"
THAT WOULD BE PRETTY CLOSE TO WHAT THE URIM AND THUMMIM IS ALL ABOUT.
There is no reason to assume this. And you can stop saying that the title of the book includes the words "the one thing that explains everything. We have already establish that to be false.
e.
modern phylacteries are cube shaped
NO.
THE ANCIENT TEFILLIN WERE ALWAY CUBE SHAPED.
THE TRADITIONAL TEFILLIN HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CUBE SHAPE BOXES.
You have not been able to establish this to be the case.
f. Judah ben Bathyra once said "my grandfather gave me this tefillin."
YEP.
Judah b. Bathyra refers, about 150 C.E.
THIS WAS AT A TIME WHEN THE JEWS WERE RECONSTRUCTING THE TEFILLIN, WHICH THEY HAD CEASED TO WEAR DURING THE BABYLONIAN DIASPORA.
Another non-point, considering that there is not a description of the shape given. Also, this has no bearing on the possible shapes of the Urim and Thummim.
g. the "Sword of God" is a hypercube.
NO.
A HYPERCUBE IS A CUBE INSIDE A CUBE WHICH WOULD ALSO HAVE 16 EDGES.
THE URIM/THUMMIM OF THIS THEORY HAS 12 EDGES AS DOES EVERY ORDINARY CUBE, BUT FOUR MORE EDGES INSIDE ON THE TETRAHEDRON.
Not exactly. That is one of the ways in which we conceptualize the tesseract, since we have no ability to actually model a fourth dimension. The same way we might draw a series of parallelagrams to depict a cube in 2d to trick our brain into seing a third dimension:
This "cube" is modeled using 3 parallelograms, none of which have right angles. Atrue cube is not actually constructed of 3 parallelograms. This is an illusion of perspective. A true hypercube is not a cube inside a cube. We use these to conceptualize a fourth dimension but the real thing would not be constructed as such.
Neither can you construct a hypercube out of a tetrahedron and 4 octants. The "edges" total 15, not 16 and there is no fourth dimension to the construction, a very imprtant attribute of a hypercube.