The bible is the way to learn the bible, not from men who may or may not distort it. I invite all people to study the bible to learn the bible but unfortunately many people rely on various intrepretations or other people to teach them the bible or what to believe and this is in err often times.
I am not suggesting to excuse all manner of sin by accepting that there are bibilical discrepancies. I however think it is in error to believe that opposing stories are both true as 1+1=2 but cannot equal also 3. It must be one or the other and my view is that we must decide in our faith what is the truth through the bible for ourselves as I feel the bible as erred passing through the hands of men and this is why while god does not err the bible does quite clearly in some areas.
The accounts of Judas differ as well:
Acts 1:18
"This very man, therefore, purchased a field with the wages for unrighteousness, and pitching head foremost he noisily burst in his midst and all his intestines were poured out."
Mt. 27:5
"So he threw the silver pieces into the temple and withdrew, and went off and hanged himself."
Which is correct?
So now we have the issue of two different accounts of the birth of Jesus as well as two differing accounts of the death of Judas. Which ones are correct?
If the bible is inerrant why are there two opposing accounts of both things plus this is just the beginning of the discrepancies.
To say the bible is inerrant is ignorant in my opinion as clearly both cases cannot be true in both scenarios given.
unbelivable, one is talking about his death of judas and when he cast his money to the sanhedrin.
not quite a contradiction, now then if one of those is wrong,why not remove it? why not check and see if theres another accounts? surely there must be. so what if you are checking scriptures verse scripture and that occurs? what then? you must have someone to doublecheck you.
what version of the bible are you using? i will post the kjv on that.
act 1:18 " Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity;and falling headlong he burst asunder in the midst and his bowels gushed out"
then unto mt 27:5 " and he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hang himself"
sounds close to me. not exact as is the nature of witness but good enough for a court. theres a general picture produced here. i can gather that he hung himself, and a field was purchased with his money to bury him see matt 27:6 -8 on that. so that isnt quite a contradiction, but a GENERAL idea and view of what when.
that is how eyewitness work, you will never get the exact words(if you do they a lyin). as we see things differently. the courts use the general consesus as what did they all notice and in the gospel we see just that.
now then i have a question for you? how do you know what the lord actually said? at point was salvation for the gentiles added? that could have been added later by the catholics or a gentile group. as all the apostles were jewish
or what of the words of jesus did he really die on the cross,or say those things.
and notice the jesus never said i came to the gentiles but the lost sheep of isreal, so then could it be that gentiles added the peter vision at a later date?