Butch5
Member
One Spirit seems to sum up the matter sufficiently, expressions notwithstanding.
Nothing changed but a twirl in your own mind.
Not sure why you have a problem with it other than maybe it being linked to an early sect, again, in your own mind. I think the matter was deliberated sufficiently to come up with a fair and solid assessment.
Don't know how it could be seen otherwise.
Nothing of that sort postured accept again, in your own mind.
Expressions may be more accurate.
Your claim is that the sight is divided. That's not what the construct is a'tall.
Never said anything different but what the scriptures cite, that God was in Christ. 2 Cor. 5:19. Not rocket science.
You posted Scripture, but you didn't post a passage that says there is a being called God that consists of three persons. That's means you are drawing you conclusion based on inferences. As I pointed out the argument you laid out is the Logical Fallacy known as "Begging the Question." Can you present an argument for your case that is not a Logical Fallacy?