• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Did God Cause the Fall?

Call it nauseum all you want it is scripture; you do not like it said so prove your point with God's Word; not your bias shallow unscriptural opinion based on nothing. I am glad you are so offended; but you are not enough offended to back up what you believe with nothing but assuption.. BIGDEAL If I am in error show me i am error. This is what the tread was named; if you have a problem with what is being said prove it with God's Word or leave.

follower of Christ said:
Benoni said:
Problem is with carnal man he cannot choose until God first draws him quickens him;
We've covered this ad nauseum, benoni....anything NEW to add here...or are we destined to keep grinding these same worn out gears because you cannot be mature enough to just admit that you were in error ?

Man is separated FROM God BECAUSE Adam sinned (any of us would have sooner or later).
ONLY God can initiate that relationship so that man can return to fellowship with Him.
We ALL know this point here. So why do you keep running back to it as tho youre making some new point that someone is disagreeing with ?



.
 
Drew said:
mondar said:
Drew, I know your concept of slavery is far weaker. You see us more as a merchant who chooses the service of sin then a slave that is in bondage to sin.
I am not accusing intentional misrepresention, but this is nowhere near an accurate reflection of what I have written. I have been crystal clear that we in no sense "choose to be in service to sin". I have repeatedly affirmed the opposite - that we we are born enslaved to sin - so I am troubled that you think I hold a view other than the one I have repeatedly, and I thought clearly, asserted.

The appropriate analogy to understand my position is the baby born hopelessly addicted to crack cocaine. Let's assume that doctors need to give the baby some cocaine or he will die. Now fast forward to when the child is 16. At this age, the child, though still hopelessly addicted to crack, has the intellectual capacity to realize his predicament.

And now for the important part. Let's say that the doctors develop a cure - an injection that will free the boy from crack addiction. The child can "freely" choose to accept the cure and thus be cured. I trust this clarifies my position (with the analogy hopefully not requiring explanation).
Thank you for showing restraint and not making accusations. You know what you believe.

Nevertheless, I am not seeing the difference in what you mean when you deny we do not "choose to be in service to sin," and that we do choose to freely accept the cure. However, I dont see the importance of the discussion anyway. The slavery issue of Romans 6 was the point. You said my concept of slavery was too strong, and so I made a positive presentation of the issue of slavery in Romans 6.
 
Romans chapters 1-8 move our thoughts through conviction for sin in the voice of the Lord speaking his law to us and writing it on our hearts. Under this conviction for sin comes the word of his righteousness to forgive, cover and not impute and also the other half of justification the promise of accrediting the obedience of one man. Next we are moved through sanctification in we ourselves experiencing death and resurrection of our spirit, the image/shadow of Jesus' death and resurrection. This work of God is also outlined in the 3rd chapter of Phillipians, verses 3-11. This is the process of God's work in and by Jesus Christ.

We do not know the purpose of God until the latter part of chapter 8 and then the clearer testimonies in chapter 9, 10, and 11. The mature understanding that is revealed in this purpose is also the theme of the book of Hebrews. Thus many children of God still dwelling in the elementary position of faith do not see any comprehensive value in the testimony concerning the Melchizedec priesthood of the Lord Jesus and do not see our ministry on the earth as in the image of Jesus' heavenly ministry. Their involvement in that ministry is minimal for they do not see it as vital. Thusly, their ministry on earth is relegated to the forgiveness of their sins against the law of Moses and thereby their service being a blend of God's authority through both Jesus and Moses. They still are the children of God by Jesus Christ while living in that state of salvation depicted in Romans 1-8.

Our ministry on earth that is witnessed in Revelation 5:9,10; 20:6 is not understood as occurring at this present time. Only through the mature understanding of grace and faith are we chosen in this priesthood. This is not the authority that comes through the visible church. There is an authority that comes through a visible group of believers. Its testimony and authority is concerning the elemental things of salvation, even though the holy Spirit directs the activity, as in the case of Barnabas and Paul.

There is a stumbling at the Chief Cornerstone through legalism. There is a falling away (backwards) though vain deceit and philosophy while confessing the name of Jesus. To stumble is to be stiff-necked.To fall away is a snare and a trap, with the table full of vomit. Hogs are stiff-necked. Dogs eat their own vomit.

May God give his children grace; to be justified, sanctified and perfected.

Eph 1:10-11
11 also we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to His purpose who works all things after the counsel of His will, NASU

Joe
 
Benoni said:
Call it nauseum all you want it is scripture; you do not like it said so prove your point with God's Word; not your bias shallow unscriptural opinion based on nothing.
Like a broken record...
Based on nothing but clear scripture, Im afraid...
Youre failing to accept the facts is inconsequential. Facts they remain.
I am glad you are so offended;
The only offense here is against Gods truth....at which you excel.

but you are not enough offended to back up what you believe with nothing but assuption..
Again...



.
 
BIGDEAL If I am in error show me i am error.
ONce more...
This is what the tread was named; if you have a problem with what is being said prove it with God's Word or leave.
And yet again....
Ive GIVEN you Gods word.
You simply ignore what you dont want to hear....
 
follower of Christ said:
mondar said:
Romans 6:20 When you were slaves to sin, you were free from the control of righteousness.
The passage begins with the concept that in the atonement we "died to sin" (vs 2--NIV), and we were "baptized into Christ Jesus.... into his death" (vs 3), and the "old man" (vs 6---kjv) was crucified with Christ.
Wonderful.
And did you happen to miss the fact that Paul ALSO shows that we PRESENT ourselves as slaves ?
Do you not know that to whom you present yourselves as slaves for obedience, you are slaves to whom you obey, whether of sin to death, or obedience to righteousness?
We arent captures like animals and forced into it....we WILLINGLY offer it.
The sinner WILLINGLY gives himself as a slave to sin...he is a slave to it because he WANTS it.
The Christian WILLINGLY gives himself as slave to God because he WANTS that position.

The only difference is that the sinner cannot change his position without God drawing him because we are separated from God and ONLY God can initiate that relationship.

:)
OK my dear little Pelagian friend, let me clarify.... While I did not directly quote verse 13, it is in the background of what I said below.....
Its like in the USA before the civil war.... the black man was a legal slave. After Lincoln emancipated the slave, where did the black man go to work? Some went to the north, some went right back to the plantation and became employees (share croppers) of the old master

However, in your defense, if you did not understand my illustration, probably others did not either.

Nevertheless, lets work with verse 13. Let me quote verse 13 in the ASV
Rom 6:13 neither present your members unto sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves unto God, as alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.
First, Romans 6:13 is not speaking to a "sinner" as you suggest. The verse assumes that you are already "alive from the dead" and on that basis exhorts you to present yourself as alive. Is a sinner already justified from sin or freed from sin (vs 7)? Did an unsaved sinner already die with Christ (vs 8)? So then, based upon an already accomplished regeneration and salvation, we should choose not to serve sin. So the issue of choice in verse 13 is correct, but you are missing the fact that this exhortation is not to sinners, but to those already in Christ.

Let me hypothetically ask.... would you suggest that sinners are already "justified from sin" (vs 7)? Would you say that sinners have died with Christ (vs 8)? If you say those things are for believers, and also the phrase in verse 13 "as alive from the dead" refers to regeneration and is for believers, then it seems a very simple deduction that the exhortations in verses 11-13 are given not to unbelieving sinners, but to believers.

Please do not go too far beyond Pelagius here. My concern is that you will suggest that we regenerate ourselves and make ourselves "alive from the dead" ( in the language of verse 13). Hopefully that would make the most ardent arminians jaw drop.

Finally, your present the concept of slavery as one where the slave makes a choice to be a slave? I would suggest that your definition of slavery is rather contradictory. The slave is a slave only because he does not have the choice of what he will do with his labor. I am aware that certain OT slaves chose to be slaves, but that is not definitional to the concept. Did the black man choose to be captured and deported from Africa to the colonies, and then did he beg the plantation owner, "please let me serve on your plantation?" Was it his "choice?" The point is that choice is an attribute of freedom, not slavery.
 
No you have not. You have given your assumtions,bias and religous opinion based on NOTHING, perhaps a vague scriptures that have nothing to do with man choosing his own salvation or man causing the fall. That is why you refuse to post them again You are led of men, creeds, dogmas and reject God's Word; because your religion is your god and God's word is dead to you. You refute scripture, spin verses and really have nothing to say. The below verse refutes your freewill or choice when it comes to salvation; so what do you do you spin it.

John 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (Gk(drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day. and John 12:32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw (Gk(drag) all men unto me.

The word draw is the Greek word from Strong’s 1670: helkuo (hel-koo'-o);or helko (hel'-ko); probably akin to 138; to drag (literally or figuratively): There is no choice for the person when God draws you, drags you or forces you to come; it is God choice not little man.


The Bible does not teach freewill, does not use the word freewill or man having a choice in the context of salvation, in fact what the Bible does show us is totally contrary to the religious word freewill. I see no free mortal agent or choice when it comes to salvation in its pages. I have searched the scriptures; a word that comes from the mind of man or the traditions of religion and not the scriptures; except the Freewill Offering in the OT. Now there are a few verses in the OT the hint towards free will and even the gospels towards following Jesus; but that has nothing to do with salvation; salvation is a NT revelation only after Christ death and resurrection. What I see is God drawing/dragging people


Notice Ephesians 2

Notice the order, God must quicken us be we are dead in sins; then He saves us by grace; then and only then do we have faith and I will add once this has happen we had no choice or freewill.


Eph, 2:1 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

(Eph. 6:17). Then the writer to the Hebrews declares that the sword of God’s word is "QUICK ."Quick means living and active  LIFE-GIVING! "For the word of God that speaks is alive and full of power  making it active, operative, energizing and effective; it is sharper than any two-edged sword" (Heb. 4:12, Amplified).

2Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
3Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.


It is a strange theory that obsesses men that the human will is greater in power than God, and that, no matter what the will of God is for His creatures, man is able finally to wreck it. Although the Holy Spirit seeks to woo all men to Christ, since God loves all mankind and wills to save all men, still, the omniscient God has boxed Himself into a corner, since the will of God is bound by the will of man, and the Omnipotent Spirit can be resisted by finite man if man so chooses. Such faulty reasoning actually brings into prominence ANOTHER OMNIPOTENCE which, because it baffles the omnipotence and love of God, is by far the greater. Man will not so God cannot! What makes this notion so tragic is that it DEIFIES MAN, elevating him to god-hood, and aligns all who embrace it with the very sin that caused the fall in the beginning! The first sin committed by man had its roots in the desire to be a FREE MORAL AGENT! Free moral agency is not the doctrine of the Bible. It is the doctrine of Romanism; and it is the doctrine of humanism. It was Erasmus, the humanist, who wrote on the freedom of man's will. It has always been the humanists that have sought to deify man and have boasted of the freedom of their sovereign will.

It is true that man has a will, but so also has God. It is true that man is endowed with power, but God is all-powerful. It is true that, speaking generally, the material world is regulated by law, but behind that law is the law-Giver and law-Administrator. Man is but the creature. God is the Creator, and untold ages before man first saw fight "the mighty God" (Isa. 9:6) existed, and ere the world was founded, made His plans; and being infinite in power and man only finite, His purpose and plan cannot be withstood or thwarted by the creatures of His own hands. To say that Christ is unable to win to Himself those who are unwilling is to deny that all power in heaven and earth is His. To say that Christ cannot put forth His power without destroying man's responsibility is a begging of the question here raised, for HE HAS put forth His power and MADE WILLING those who HAVE come to Him, and if He did this without destroying their responsibility, just why "CANNOT" He do so with others?

The truth of the supernatural and all-powerful DRAWING of God is one of the most neglected of all the great truths of God's Word, and yet it is one of the most important. Undoubtedly the reason for its neglect is that it is repugnant to the world of unregenerate man, and professing Christians whose theology denies the sovereign and infinite grace of God. One of the chief characteristics of apostate Christendom is that it vigorously opposes any teaching of Scripture that refuses to give man the glory. Therefore any doctrine of the Bible that declares man's helplessness apart from the activating power of God is bound to arouse the ire of the adversary and his followers.
 
Benoni said:
No you have not. You have given your assumtions,bias and religous opinion based on NOTHING
Are you intentionally being obtuse ?
perhaps a vague scriptures that have nothing to do with man choosing his own salvation or man causing the fall.
AGAIN...man is SEPARATED from God BECAUSE of Adams choice to sin. NO MAN can reunite in fellowship with God EXCEPT the FAther draw him.
Stop with your pathetic strawmen, please.

That is why you refuse to post them again You are led of men, creeds, dogmas and reject God's Word; because your religion is your god and God's word is dead to you. You refute scripture, spin verses and really have nothing to say. The below verse refutes your freewill or choice when it comes to salvation; so what do you do you spin it.
blah, blah, blah....anything of any relevance whatsoever to offer ?

John 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw (Gk(drag) him: and I will raise him up at the last day. and John 12:32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw (Gk(drag) all men unto me.

The word draw is the Greek word from Strong’s 1670: helkuo (hel-koo'-o);or helko (hel'-ko); probably akin to 138; to drag (literally or figuratively): There is no choice for the person when God draws you, drags you or forces you to come; it is God choice not little man.
Sorry but you are wrong.
Just like with your Romans 8:20 error,you are trying to distort the INTENT of a verse to suit your needs.
Jesus INTENT was not that God FORCES anyone...but that only WHEN God draws can a man come to Him.
As usual you entirely miss the point.
The Bible does not teach freewill,
Yeah....it does..
READERS SEE >>> Scriptural support provided by FoC:
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=39238&p=476086#p476086
does not use the word freewill or man having a choice in the context of salvation,
It certainly DOES.
It simply shows that man does not have that option UNLESS the Father is actively drawing him.
in fact what the Bible does show us is totally contrary to the religious word freewill.
Do you honestly think you will win this discussion by repeating yourself 1000 more times ?
Im on permanent disability friend...I have nothing else to do with my time except sit here and respond to your inane repetition.
I see no free mortal agent or choice when it comes to salvation in its pages.
Because you DONT WANT to see it.
that doesnt change the fact that its in there.
I have searched the scriptures; a word that comes from the mind of man or the traditions of religion and not the scriptures; except the Freewill Offering in the OT.
Sorry but that argument has already been refuted. Didnt even read the material, did ya ? ;)
Now there are a few verses in the OT the hint towards free will
Pathetic.
If free will did not exist then scripture 'hinting' at such a concept would be LIES ;)

and even the gospels towards following Jesus; but that has nothing to do with salvation; salvation is a NT revelation only after Christ death and resurrection. What I see is God drawing/dragging people
WHEN God draws THEN man has the OPTION of reconciliation....not until.
We've already proven that man CAN reject God here, like it or not.



Notice Ephesians 2

Notice the order, God must quicken us be we are dead in sins; then He saves us by grace; then and only then do we have faith and I will add once this has happen we had no choice or freewill.
God draws, MAN responds....yes, we know the order :nono

It is a strange theory that obsesses men that the human will is greater in power than God
Its an even stranger, more perverse theory that says God is so powerless that Free will is a threat to His sovereignty.
and that, no matter what the will of God is for His creatures, man is able finally to wreck it.
Straw man again.
No one here said man can wreck a single thing. Try again.
God foreknew mans sin and set a plan in motion because of that sin.
Nothing was 'wrecked'.



.
 
mondar said:
OK my dear little Pelagian friend, let me clarify....
Alright my little Hyper Calvinistic friend, go right ahead ;)

Its like in the USA before the civil war.... the black man was a legal slave. After Lincoln emancipated the slave, where did the black man go to work? Some went to the north, some went right back to the plantation and became employees (share croppers) of the old master
Thats real nice but your previous post did not mention WILLINGLY offering oneself into slavery.
Dont get bent out of shape if we cant read your mind for you.

However, in your defense, if you did not understand my illustration, probably others did not either.
No one could have given you supposedly left out details (tho they seem to conflict with your previous POINT, so who knows).


Let me hypothetically ask.... would you suggest that sinners are already "justified from sin" (vs 7)? Would you say that sinners have died with Christ (vs 8)? If you say those things are for believers, and also the phrase in verse 13 "as alive from the dead" refers to regeneration and is for believers, then it seems a very simple deduction that the exhortations in verses 11-13 are given not to unbelieving sinners, but to believers.
I dont see how this is relevant to MY point to you earlier unless Im forgetting something

Please do not go too far beyond Pelagius here.
Lets leave others out of this so I dont have to start resorting to calling you by anyones name either.
My name is William and I follow no ones teaching but what Ive gleaned from scripture. I dont know this Pelican guy, nor do I care to...

My concern is that you will suggest that we regenerate ourselves and make ourselves
"alive from the dead" ( in the language of verse 13). Hopefully that would make the most ardent arminians jaw drop.
Then I think youd better READ the thread, friend...Im certain my view on such a matter has been made VERY clear in this thread.

Finally, your present the concept of slavery as one where the slave makes a choice to be a slave?
No, PAUL presents the concept. I simply agreed with Paul.
I would suggest that your definition of slavery is rather contradictory.
Again, READ Pauls words in Romans. Your dispute is with him, not me.
The slave is a slave only because he does not have the choice of what he will do with his labor.
Not according to Paul.
Are you going to play the part of benoni now and pretend you dont SEE what Paul SAYS ?

I am aware that certain OT slaves chose to be slaves, but that is not definitional to the concept.
Im not interested in everyone else' definition, but what GODS word shows.

Did the black man choose to be captured and deported from Africa to the colonies,
We arent discussing African men, now are we ? We're discussion PAUL in ROMAN
 
It is true that man has a will, but so also has God.
And it was God will that man HAVE free will to choose. The true student of scripture cannot miss that fact.
It is true that man is endowed with power, but God is all-powerful.
Yes, God is...so HIS sovereign determined will prevails.
That does not mean that He caused Adam to sin.
It just as easily means that His intention was to save mankind once Adam DID sin and thus He had laid out a plan before even Creating Adam BECAUSE He foreknew Adams failure.

The truth of the supernatural and all-powerful DRAWING of God is one of the most neglected of all the great truths of God's Word, and yet it is one of the most important.
Its also the most distorted and abused by some fallacies.
ALL of us know that GOD must draw a man before reconciliation is possible. None that I see are denying that fact.
Once He has drawn, man DOES have a choice to repent and come to Him, or reject...just as His word proves.
The only man that NEVER has a choice to be reconciled is the man that God NEVER draws....and since NONE of us can prove anything in that regard there is little point even disputing it...we have no clue if He draws EVERY man at some point, or if He simply foreknows who will reject Him and so doesnt draw those men who will reject to begin with.
And this certainly does not change the fact that ADAM while still in fellowship with God had the CHOICE to sin or not.

Therefore any doctrine of the Bible that declares man's helplessness apart from the activating power of God is bound to arouse the ire of the adversary and his followers.
Nothing but straw men.
I think youd better start reading our posts, friend, because no one is claiming anything of the sort here.
I think your arguing with yourself and your strawmen, quite frankly.

 
READERS here again you should note benoni's contradictions.
benoni said:
The Bible does not teach freewill,
versus
benoni said:
Now there are a few verses in the OT the hint towards free will
in one breath benoni says that the bible doesnt teach free will, then in the same post he admits otherwise.
Its no wonder the fallacy here is in so much chaos, and so easily exposed.


.
 
That is all you have is personal attacks and now you go so low as taking something out of context; you surely are a frustrated debater.

Salvation is a NT revelation not OT; so the T is not relevant because the blood of Jesus had not been shed yet; so if there was a freewill toward salvation it would have to be in the NT;BUT it is NOT. No one comes, no one unless the Father draw/drag him... There is no freewill in being DRAGGED... I like the word FORCED.

follower of Christ said:
READERS here again you should note benoni's contradictions.
benoni said:
The Bible does not teach freewill,
versus
benoni said:
Now there are a few verses in the OT the hint towards free will
in one breath benoni says that the bible doesnt teach free will, then in the same post he admits otherwise.
Its no wonder the fallacy here is in so much chaos, and so easily exposed.


.
 
Benoni said:
That is all you have is personal attacks and now you go so low as taking something out of context; you surely are a frustrated debater.
Sorry, but pointing out your contradictions is hardly a personal attack.
And you hardly frustrate anyone except with your annoying habit of NOT reading posts then responding anyway with this mind-numbing repetition and strawmen.
Salvation is a NT revelation not OT;
Really ?
So the Patriarchs were not looking forward to the time of the Messiah then ?

so the T is not relevant because the blood of Jesus had not been shed yet; so if there was a freewill toward salvation it would have to be in the NT;BUT it is NOT. No one comes, no one unless the Father draw/drag him... There is no freewill in being DRAGGED... I like the word FORCED.
Nothing but incoherent nonsense.
God does not FORCE anyone to come to Him, friend, and your perversion of ONE word in ONE verse isnt going to change that fact.

We've already proven that man CAN reject God/salvation...

DOES man have the CHOICE to REJECT God ?
Wm Tipton

Assertions/Conclusions of this article
Simply to show that scripture does support the idea that man does have free will to reject God both before and after having come under this covenant.

Supporting Evidence
See that you do not refuse Him who speaks. For if they did not escape, having refused Him who warned them, how much more shall we not escape if we turn away from Him who warns from heaven; whose voice then shook the earth; but now He has promised, saying, "Yet once more I shake not only the earth, but also the heaven."
(Heb 12:25-26)

how shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation, which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by those who heard Him;
(Heb 2:3 MKJV)

For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.
2 Peter 2:21

For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

But call to remembrance the former days, in which, after ye were illuminated, ye endured a great fight of afflictions; Partly, whilst ye were made a gazingstock both by reproaches and afflictions; and partly, whilst ye became companions of them that were so used. For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, and took joyfully the spoiling of your goods, knowing in yourselves that ye have in heaven a better and an enduring substance.
Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great recompence of reward. For ye have need of patience, that, after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise. For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry.
Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.
But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.

(Heb 10:26-39 KJV)
The statement "we are not of them who draw back unto perdition" is entirely absurd *IF* 'them' had not actually 'draw back' to perdition.
And the writers EXHORTATION TO these believing Hebrews is VOID of ANY and ALL meaning in REFERRING to these who had 'DRAWN BACK' in his warning to these believers *IF* they could not do the very same thing.
For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance;seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame . For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God: But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.
But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak.

(Heb 6:4-9 KJV)


Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus; Who was faithful to him that appointed him, as also Moses was faithful in all his house. For this man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honour than the house. For every house is builded by some man; but he that built all things is God.

And Moses verily was faithful in all his house, as a servant, for a testimony of those things which were to be spoken after; But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.

Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice, Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness: When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years. Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways. So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.)

Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.
But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.

For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end; While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation. For some, when they had heard, did provoke: howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses. But with whom was he grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness? And to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to them that believed not? So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief.
(Heb 3:1-19 KJV)
 
Yes, God is...so HIS sovereign determined will prevails.
That does not mean that He caused Adam to sin.
It just as easily means that His intention was to save mankind once Adam DID sin and thus He had laid out a plan before even Creating Adam BECAUSE He foreknew Adams failure
.


Wow you almost have it right here; you just need to prove your opionion with God's Word or it is just wood hay and stubble.

You said" That does not mean that He caused Adam to sin". This is what you cannot prove and seeing Romans 8:20 and Ps 90 refutes this; you can never prove this point that God did not cause the fall seeing God Word says HE CAUSED THE FALL. Unless you can show this in scripture there is no truth in your statement. This is scriptural fact no matter how much you want to spin or voice your bias opinion.

You said" Yes God is soverign and so HIS sovereign determined will prevails"; attually it will prevail nothing can stop it to include the will of little bitty Adam.. It was God who cause the fall and it is God who took blaime for it.

Ps. 90:1-3. "Lord, You have been our dwelling place in all generations. Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever You have formed the earth or the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God. You (God) turn man to destruction; and say return you children of men.

(NIRV) Romans 8: 20 The created world was bound to fail. But that was not the result of its own choice. It was planned that way by the One who made it. God planned to set the created world free. He didn't want it to rot away completely. Instead, he wanted it to have the same glorious freedom that his children have
 
Benoni said:
Wow you almost have it right here; you just need to prove your opionion with God's Word or it is just wood hay and stubble.
Certainly...

You said" That does not mean that He caused Adam to sin". This is what you cannot prove and seeing Romans 8:20 and Ps 90 refutes this; you can never prove this point that God did not cause the fall seeing God Word says HE CAUSED THE FALL.
Complete tripe nonsense.
NEITHER of those passages show that they applied to Adam WHILE Adam had not yet sinned and was STILL in fellowship with God.
It must be horrible to worship a 'god' who is supposedly 'for' you and yet working AGAINST you in the same breath...
Unless you can show this in scripture there is no truth in your statement. This is scriptural fact no matter how much you want to spin or voice your bias opinion.
Until you can PROVE that your out of context verses mentioned applied PRIOR to Adams fall, then Im afraid you are just grinding gears...and moderation should honestly consider shutting this worthless thread down, quite frankly.
You said" Yes God is soverign and so HIS sovereign determined will prevails"; attually it will prevail nothing can stop it to include the will of little bitty Adam.. It was God who cause the fall and it is God who took blaime for it.
No, God didnt take the blame for mans fall...that is YOUR addition to the text.
Ps. 90:1-3. "Lord, You have been our dwelling place in all generations. <period, end of sentence)

Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever You have formed the earth or the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God. <period, end of sentence)

You (God) turn man to destruction; and say return you children of men. <period, end of sentence)
Not a thing to do with Adam...
(NIRV) Romans 8: 20 The created world was bound to fail. But that was not the result of its own choice. It was planned that way by the One who made it. God planned to set the created world free. He didn't want it to rot away completely. Instead, he wanted it to have the same glorious freedom that his children have


Romans 8:20 - A judgment on sinful man
Wm Tipton

Assertions/Conclusions of this Article
To show that this subjection of futility is an EFFECT, not a CAUSE, of mans condition and choice to sin.

Supporting Evidence

Romans 8:20 is one of those passages that there is a lot of disagreement upon by those who ARE scholars of scripture and of Greek.
It is absolutely not a good idea to found a whole doctrine upon in order to put the blame of OUR choice to sin on God.

I spent some time looking at it again and the disagreement of scholars is amazing...if men who DO know Greek and spend their whole lives studying Gods word cannot agree on what this tiny verse means exactly (there seems to be some disagreement on how the greek is to even be rendered into english exactly), then its is VERY dangerous to ignore verses like this one;

Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am tempted by God"; for God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does He Himself tempt anyone.
But each one is tempted by his own lusts, being drawn away and being seduced by them. Then lust, when it conceives, gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death.
(Jas 1:13-15 )

..that CLEARLY says that GOD is not responsible for OUR sin.

To run to a verse that may not even actually SAY what one wants it to say and then reject something that has NO other intent to but to purposefully convey ONE intent that GOD ISNT making us sin, is fairly dangerous, in my opinion.

As far as I have seen and understood it Romans 8:20 is a SENTENCE upon man...entirely against mans will he was subjected to this sentence that came about because of his DECISION to sin against God.

When man sinned against God did man, of his OWN WILL, WANT to be subjected to this 'futility' ?
That would make us insane as well as sinners.
There is NOTHING in Romans 8:20 that nullifies James 1:13-15, Im afraid. And it is a foolhardy venture to try to make that the case.

Romans 8:20 DOESNT say God makes men sin and is fairly uncertain as to its EXACT intent....James 1:13-15 CLEARLY presents that God does NOT do so.


Here are some words of men who know the greek language, since I dont (and I doubt others here do either).

Rom 8:20
Was subjected (hupetagē). Second aorist passive indicative of hupatassŠ(cf. Rom_8:7).
To vanity (tēi mataiotēti). Dative case. Rare and late word, common in lxx. From mataios, empty, vain. Eph_4:17; 2Pe_2:18.
Not of its own will (ouch hekousa). Common adjective, in N.T. only here and 1Co_9:27. It was due to the effect of man’s sin.
But by reason of him (alla dia ton). Because of God.
In hope that (Ephesians' helpidi hoti). Note the form helpidi rather than the usual elpidi and so Ephesians'. Hoti can be causal “because†instead of declarative “that.â€Â\
Vincent WORD studies


2.0
Cause and effect.

WHEN God CREATED He called creation GOOD....not 'corrupt'.
Gen 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.
The WHOLE creation which WAS GOOD in the beginning now has been affected by Adams transgression...
For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.
(Romans 8:20-22 KJV)
[/quote]
ALL creation has been subjected to futility and corruption, which WAS NOT said about it in the beginning when it WAS 'good'.

It was not 'corrupted' by God in the beginning as some false doctrines profess.
It happened when Adam chose to sin and thus caused himself and creation to be subjected TO this punishment.
Creation could NOT be 'good' and 'corrupt' at the same time.
The change happened when Adam sinned and God pronounced judgment on man..

.
 
benoni.

You have yet to answer my question.

DOES GOD ORDAIN IT WHEN A MAN RAPES A CHILD ?
Yes....or....no ?

I know why you wont respond clearly, btw.

A 'No' response means you lack conviction where you doctrine is concerned and cannot even believe it yourself.
A 'yes' response would absolutely show the readers what sort of monster of a god you are pushing here.

Either way you lose face. I wouldnt want to answer it either.
But in not answering it you are saying more to the reader than a yes or no would...your hesitation in saying YES,He does shows us that you are worried about how that is going to look and that you are more interested in how others view you than in Gods truth.

Why not just tell us YES, God DOES ORDAIN it, like you supposedly believe and be done with it ?

:)
 
God is God not god. You have a real problem with that.

NOTHING happens out side of God's Will or God would be a god. You also have a problem with that..

It is Satan who does the negative handy work of God; but Satan cannot do anything out side of God's will.

Isaiah 54:16 Behold, I have created the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and that bringeth forth an instrument for his works; and I have created the waster to destroy.

follower of Christ said:
benoni.

You have yet to answer my question.

DOES GOD ORDAIN IT WHEN A MAN RAPES A CHILD ?
Yes....or....no ?

I know why you wont respond clearly, btw.

A 'No' response means you lack conviction where you doctrine is concerned and cannot even believe it yourself.
A 'yes' response would absolutely show the readers what sort of monster of a god you are pushing here.

Either way you lose face. I wouldnt want to answer it either.
But in not answering it you are saying more to the reader than a yes or no would...your hesitation in saying YES,He does shows us that you are worried about how that is going to look and that you are more interested in how others view you than in Gods truth.

Why not just tell us YES, God DOES ORDAIN it, like you supposedly believe and be done with it ?

:)
 
follower of Christ said:
mondar said:
OK my dear little Pelagian friend, let me clarify....
Alright my little Hyper Calvinistic friend, go right ahead ;)

Ahh, but you are Pelagian, and I am not hyper-Calvinist. However, I know most non-Calvinists do not know the difference between Calvinists like me, and Hyper-Calvinist.

I read the rest of your post, but recognize that that you are failing to grasp some basic concepts, things like regeneration, the old man, baptism with Christ, etc. You do not understand why verse 13 is an exhortation to believers, and why this is different then the slavery to sin of the unregenerate. To actually get you to look at a text and understand these concepts seems too much work, or more like an impossible task.

[quote:2xqj5tbg] Finally, your present the concept of slavery as one where the slave makes a choice to be a slave?
No, PAUL presents the concept. I simply agreed with Paul.[/quote:2xqj5tbg]
Also, I see obvious dangers in any reply to you for this reason... I think your extreme passion comes from equivocating your own views with the views of Paul. Once you make that equivocation, anyone questioning your thoughts on the text is questioning Paul. I suspect that this is what benoni was talking about when he mentioned your tradition being so thick. A person who does not recognize that he has a tradition is usually the one most deeply steeped in his tradition. The person who recognizes that he has a tradition and then constantly checks his tradition against the Scriptures is in the best position. I think equivocating the thoughts of the biblical authors with your own thoughts is your tradition, and it is a very heavy and thick tradition.
 
Why would I loose face I am quoting God's Word not my opinion. THERE IS NOTHING THAT WILL HAPPEN OUTSIDE OF GODS WILL; He is not a little god. :-)
 
I see you STILL didnt answer the question ;)
READERS TAKE NOTE of that fact.
For some reason B here doesnt want to answer the question ;)


God is God not god. You have a real problem with that.
no, GOD is God....this thing you are talking about isnt God at all

NOTHING happens out side of God's Will or God would be a god. You also have a problem with that..
False.
SIN is not God WILL...sin is missing the mark...walking OUTSIDE of Gods will.
Apparently you think SIN is Gods will...which explains a lot...

It is Satan who does the negative handy work of God; but Satan cannot do anything out side of God's will.
None of us do anything unless God permits it.
Permitting something doesnt mean controlling OR condoning it.

God ISNT ok with your sin, benoni....and HE isnt responsible for causing it.
 
Back
Top