No it is not and I know different.
You
believe differently, but you do not
know differently.
If the Father had a beginning, it
necessarily is by another being. To say he caused his own existence is as irrational as scientific naturalists claiming the universe came into being on its own. It's a logical impossibility, that also contradicts Scripture.
An opinion based on Scripture and sound reasoning.
God is Spirit. We don't know where spirit originates, but we can look up and know what we see was made by Him.
Of course, but God did no originate.
However old you think the visible universe is the invisible Father is older.
Yes, that goes without saying.
Maybe but I don't know that He always existed as He never states so. I know He's unbegotten.
It's basic reasoning. If he created all that exists, including space and time, then he cannot
not have ever existed. This is why he is a necessary being--all else is contingent on his existence; he necessarily has always existed.
Since He is God and not because of your reasoning this is useless reasoning.
If my reasoning is "useless," prove it. Your saying so doesn't make it so.
I never said you were.
and unlike Jesus the Father has no Father or God.
Of course he doesn't. And that means that he has always existed. It cannot be otherwise.
Thats not implied by His words. "No God WAS FORMED" before me as opposed to NO God was before me.
So it suggests He doesn't share your God with no beginning theology.
"Before me no god was formed, nor shall there be any after me." All the gods of the nations are man-made,
they are formed. The entire point is that there has never been another god and there will never be another god, other than Yahweh. It absolutely does not imply that God had a beginning. That is to completely ignore the context of the entirety of Scripture.
If you think the God of the Bible had a beginning, that he did not always exist, then he
cannot be the God of the Bible and is a god of your own imagination. If God came into existence, then
that would have been the beginning of space and time and
he would have been the first created thing, created by himself no less, which is nonsense.
Thats your assumption as everything you read about Jesus shows He inherited and received from His GOD.
And the Father was living in Him. The Father has not received from any other being.
You have often repeated this, but it shows that you are
still continuing to ignore passages such as John 1:1-3, 14, and Phil. 2:5-8. That, or you simply do not understand them. The Son has always been God, but
became flesh, voluntarily.
For those of us who hold to the Father as the only true God His Spirit is not another distinct person from Himself. It can be seen as distinct from Jesus but never the other way around.
The problem for you is that the Holy Spirit is called the Spirit of God and the Spirit of Christ, among others.
We have the Spirit of Christ in us, and our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit which is also referred to as the Spirit of truth. The truth Jesus delivered He received from the Father.
Only believers have the Spirit of Christ in them, but one cannot be a believer if they don't have the God of the Bible.
God spoke to us by His Son.
Yes, I know.
Jesus asked the Father for this other advocate.
Yes, "this other advocate." You don't even know what you have said here. As I pointed out in the other thread, and you ignored, an advocate is necessarily a person; advocates
cannot be non-persons. Jesus was the first advocate and the Holy Spirit was the second.
This person of the Spirit you believe in wasn't even involved in this sending because the Father sent His Spirit in Jesus's name.
The Spirit came, so how can he not be involved?
Where is this 3rd person noted in the Godhead, and in honor and glory by the host of heaven?
Matt. 28:19, for one. He is an advocate, for another. Perhaps you should actually address all that I posted in that other thread,
HERE.
One God the Father FROM whom all things come and One Lord Jesus Christ THROUGH whom all things come.
Again,
if "one God, the Father" precludes the Son from being God,
then it necessarily follows that "one Lord, Jesus Christ" precludes the Father from ever being Lord
. But we know that the Father is
also called Lord.
Also again,
if "from whom all things came" speaks of the Father's timeless, eternal nature,
then it necessarily follows that "through whom all things came" speaks of the Son's timeless, eternal nature.
It cannot be otherwise. If either the Father
or the Son had a beginning, then that verse is self-contradictory and false.
Those are both based on basic logic and sound reasoning.
To Him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb.
Knowing the Father and Jesus whom He sent.
Grace and peace to you from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.
What is your point with these statements? Are you trying to somehow show that the Holy Spirit isn't also a person by ignoring a host of other verses and passages and posting only those which appear to support your position? That's not good biblical exegesis.
The Spirit bears witness from the mind of the Spirit.
They shall all be taught by God. Those who listen and learn from the Father go to the Son.
I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
The Father states He is the God of the Son
Where?
and the Son states My Father and My God.
And Thomas states Jesus is his Lord and his God. The Father also implies the Son is Yahweh in Heb. 1:10-12. Your position is going to remain contradictory as long as you ignore those passages which don't fit your position.
The Father is clearly seen as greater by the Son. The Son is begotten, the Father is unbegotten.
Again, you continually fail to take into account that the Son is God incarnate.