wondering , the whole Prostent Reformation is based on Luther's revelation of justification by faith, not works, and so I'm cornfuzzled as to why any Catholic would seek to assert they also believe as Luther did about faith.
This is a good question.
Luther was 500 or more years ago.
The CC had lost its way...that's the best way I could describe it.
It started out good, but got lost along the way.
Maybe absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Luther was upset about the indulgences being sold in the church.
And he was right, of course.
Also, he was reading Ephesians 2:8 and he had a lucid moment as to what it meant.
The CC had been teaching it's lay persons to just follow church instructions and they would be saved.
This included not only good works, but payments to the church, strict adherence to the rules of the church, etc.
When Luther really understood Ephesians 2:8 he realized that he was truly free in Christ and his faith and wanted to disseminate this feeling he had for God and God's rules.
One little problem here....Luther taught FAITH ALONE.
NOT ONLY FAITH.
Only Faith means we are saved by faith only, only faith.
Nothing else but God calling and our response to Him.
It's a free gift along with salvation. In Ephesians 2:8 everything is a gift, both faith and salvation.
FAITH ALONE means what you and I argue all the time with others.
Faith ALONE cannot save because it is a dead faith....James.
With faith some kind of personal change must take place...
an internal change which leads to external "good deeds/works".
Just to continue a little more, hope I'm not going to conflate the issue...
At the Council of Trent it was declared that faith and works are necessary for justification...
It was battling the reformed and came up with some ideas.
But, we have to ask, which justification?
The salvific justification? Only God can save, nothing we do.
But ongoing justification (sanctification) does require good works/deeds.
So there you have it.
That's the best I can do.