Edward
2024 Supporter
- Sep 18, 2012
- 16,152
- 6,574
I agree that the Bible is consistent. When understood correctly, there are no contradictions in Scripture. The problem I have with this is when people say that the same thing always has the same meaning, even though it's in a different context. Look at the creation account as an example. The first mention of the word "day" is in Gen. 1:3. Some people say that it refers to a literal 24-hour day. But what about this?
In that day Tyre will be forgotten for seventy years (Is. 23:15 ESV)How can Tyre be forgotten for 70 years in 24 hours? It's obvious that "day" here refers to a longer period of time.
Some say that the first mention of the word "day" refers to a long period of time, perhaps even millions of years. But then what about this?
In the eleventh year, in the third month, on the first day of the month, the word of the Lord came to me: (Ez. 31:1 ESV)Did this happen in the third million years of the month? Everybody can see that that's nonsense. It obviously refers to a period of 24 hours. So, however you interpret Gen. 1:3, the meaning of "day" there can't be applied to every occurrence of "day" after that. We have to look at each case in context to understand it properly. We can't just look at the first case and decide that it always means the same thing.
The TOG
Yeah, agreed. Different meaning are not always obvious, but there with the same words depending on context, how it was used, and the Greek/Hebrew definitions. Like for instance, your example of "day" as when used with the 'day Tyre will be forgotten'...is used more accurately as uh, an "age" or period of time and not a 24 hour period.