Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Eternal security or conditional security?

When a believer stops believing in the gospel they are no longer a believer that they should somehow still qualify by virtue of having faith to be saved.

That isn't biblical. It contradicts scripture that says no one can snatch you from the hands of the Father or Jesus.
 
My free-will was inspired when I received Christ.
When God presents you to Christ you receive a new heart, new mind.....the old heart that kept you from receiving Jesus is lost.

John 6:37 All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.
......you can't come to Christ unless you are given.


I'll take that as a yes.

If you have a free will, are you free to exercise your free will, to turn away from Christ, and confess Allah as Lord?



JLB
 
I said this:
"though one is saved by faith in Christ, they will be de-saved by lack of works."
Those works signifying the absence of the faith that justifies all by itself apart from works.
I'm sorry, but this just doesn't make sense. Faith in Christ justifies all by itself anyway, so your comment is puzzling. You believe that salvation can be lost. That means that someone who HAS faith in Christ, which justifies, can lost their salvation.

btw, justification is a gift from God, per Paul in Rom 3:24 and 5:15,16,17, and we know that the gifts of God are irrevocable from Rom 11:29.

How can a justified person ever end up in the lake of fire?

Right, if anyone's name is not found in the book of life, they will be tossed into the lake of fire.
The problem is that there are no verses that teach that one can lose eternal life.


Revelation also teaches that those who don't over come will have their names removed from the book of life:
5‘He who overcomes will thus be clothed in white garments; and I will not erase his name from the book of life, and I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels." (Revelation 3:5 NASB)
No, the verse does not teach what you claim. In Revelation, overcoming is accomplished by lifestyle. To apply this verse to how one avoids the lake of fire means a system of salvation based on one's lifestyle, which is completely contrary to the rest of Scripture. We are saved ONLY by faith in Christ. Not of works (lifestyle), lest any man should boast. Eph 2:8,9

So how is it that OSAS can claim that non-overcomers are not going to be tossed into the fire, but non-overcomers will not be in the book of life?
Because we are saved by faith, not by works.

1 Cor 3:14,15 refutes the idea that one is saved by works.
 
That isn't biblical. It contradicts scripture that says no one can snatch you from the hands of the Father or Jesus.
Correct, no one can snatch you from the hands of God. What can happen is you yourself can stop believing the gospel, thus the warnings not to do that. Loss of faith will indeed remove the one who presently believes from the vine, just as Israel--who are now lost, not somehow still saved--was removed from the vine because of unbelief:

"they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear; 21for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either." (Romans 11:20-21 NASB)
 
I said this:
"In the context of Rev 2-3, an overcomer is a fruitful, faithful believer, not just a believer. And the Bible teaches that one is saved by grace, through faith, NOT BY WORKS, lest any one should boast. Eph 2:8,9.

So, the ONLY conclusion is that Rev 2:11 is a "litotes", which I explained and provided my source."
An overcomer is someone who has faith in Jesus Christ regardless of the circumstances.
I don't see how this challenges my statement. The context supports my comments.

An overcomer is a believer.
No, an overcomer is a believer who actually overcomes.

Those who no longer believe, and no longer overcomers.
Agreed. And they will not be rewarded, as the context shows.

Are you trying to say that believing is now a work?
No, overcoming is a work that will be rewarded.

Why is the concept of eternal reward being rejected, since the word is found all over the NT?

What more does someone have to do than believe, to be saved?
Nothing at all.

That's why those who don't overcome, and removed from the book of Life.
There's no logic to this statement. Nor Scriptural support.
 
To remain in, to reside in. It's to remain in Him with the understanding that you must reside in Christ - He is the light and the life. Without Him we can do nothing.
John 15:5
I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in me, and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.
We have no ability to be "removed from Him" even as the LOS doctrine teaches that we can.

We can't because we have been sealed with the Holy Spirit FOR the day of redemption, as shown in the OP.

And no one has yet provided any verse that teaches that we can break this seal or that God will do so for ANY REASON. We are sealed for the day of redemption.
 
There has been times I wish I didn't have the father that I have....and vice versa there have been times my dad wishes I wasn't his son.

But guess what? We never denied each other... I am my father's son and there never is a time where we deny knowing each other.
That's fine. But there ARE both fathers and sons who HAVE denied each other. And, so what? That didn't change the FACT of physical relationship one bit. They STILL REMAINED related to each other. By DNA.

It's no different spiritually. Even if one side denies the other, the relationship remains intact. What is lost is fellowship, not relationship.

The trouble is that subscribers act and talk a lot like believers. But there is that hair-breadth of a difference that makes all the difference.
Annanias and Saphira were subscribers...not believers...and the list of subscribers is long...
This is only an assumption. There is no evidence that they weren't believers.
 
OSAS is the deceiver. It says you do NOT have to have the word abide in you which you heard from the beginning, because it claims even if you don't do that you still have the Son and the Father and the promise of eternal life. That's not what John says. He wrote these things because of "those who are trying to deceive you" (vs.26).
The doctrine of ES deceives no one. It is the LOS doctrine that ignores Scripture. Both Paul and Jesus used the aorist tense many times in regard to getting saved, and you have all your marbles on 1 Cor 15 as the definitive guide for how long one is saved. But the aorist tense refutes that idea.
 
The only way to lose your salvation is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, Matthew 12:31, but if you are truly standing in the Holy place that is our faith in Christ and believing in all of Gods promises of eternal life with Him then why would any blasphemy against the Holy Spirit that we are sealed by unto the day of redemption that will come in the end of days.Those that lack knowledge, but yet are sealed, do run the risk of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit if faced with life threatening persecutions in order to save their own life. Never heard of such a thing in Scripture or taught by Christ?

Mat 10:38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.
Mat 10:39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.
The religious leaders in Matthew Chapter 12 were not believers, nor were they saved. They had no salvation to lose. The reason one can not be forgiven for their blasphemy is when they witness the work of the Holy Spirit (knowing so) but assigns the miracles to the work of Satan in the presence of the Lord is insulting the Spirit of God in the face of God.

The born again believer can not and will not blasphemy the Holy Spirit, for he is a temple of the Holy Spirit. A believer can hinder or grieve the Holy Spirit in him by lack of obedience to His will, but never lose it.....it is a guaranteed that that possession (of the Lords), is sealed. The mature born again believers know this. But we are few compared to the many worldly churches that teach things of the doctrines of men as if they can teach Spiritual things carnally. (Eph. 1:3-14) (Eph. 4:30)
 
Last edited:
It sends those who DON'T BELIEVE to hell.
When a believer stops believing in the gospel they are no longer a believer that they should somehow still qualify by virtue of having faith to be saved.
Those who have believed have been given the free gift of eternal life. And eternal life is an irrevocable gift of God.
 
Well then, what do all the verses in the OP teach, if not eternal security?


Nothing in the OP teaches eternal security.

But he who endures to the end shall be saved. Matthew 24:13

Those who turn from Him and worship the beast and take his mark on their forehead or hand, during the tribulation will be cast into the lake of fire.

This is just one example of the many many warnings from the Apostles and Jesus in the New Testament, about turning away from, departing from, or falling away from Him.

7 For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows. 9 “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake. 10 And then many will be offended, will betray one another, and will hate one another. 11 Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many. 12 And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold. 13 But he who endures to the end shall be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come. Matthew 24:7-14


9 Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, 10 he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. 11 And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.”

12 Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. Revelation 14:9-12


Worshiping images of other gods is idolatry.

8 But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” Revelation 21:8


Unfortunately, their will be many Christians who do not heed this warning, who have been taught the unbiblical OSAS doctrine, and who believe they can worship the image of the beast and receive his mark, or turn to Allah and confess him as Lord, yet continue to be saved.


JLB
 
That's fine. But there ARE both fathers and sons who HAVE denied each other. And, so what? That didn't change the FACT of physical relationship one bit. They STILL REMAINED related to each other. By DNA.

It's no different spiritually. Even if one side denies the other, the relationship remains intact. What is lost is fellowship, not relationship.


This is only an assumption. There is no evidence that they weren't believers.

I, not the Bible, am drawing a distinction that John seems to draw in his letter.
But it fits really well.
Some may say that it is splitting hairs. I don't.

I just see a lot of people "playing church" instead of worshipping God. You may have a different experience than I.

I pretend to love this world but I really love heaven.
 
Nothing in the OP teaches eternal security.
Then prove your claim by telling me what the verses are teaching from the OP. They DO teach something.

Remember, ALL Scripture is profitable for teaching, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness.

These verses cannot just be ignored or jettisoned. If they don't teach ES, then what do they teach?

This has not been answered.
 
I, not the Bible, am drawing a distinction that John seems to draw in his letter.
But it fits really well.
Some may say that it is splitting hairs. I don't.

I just see a lot of people "playing church" instead of worshipping God. You may have a different experience than I.

I pretend to love this world but I really love heaven.
I can't tell if this is an agreement with my comments, or a disagreement, regarding fellowship vs relationship.
 
How is this question relevant to the discussion about loss of salvation?

Those who overcome are those who believe Jesus Christ.

Who is he who overcomes the world, but he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God? 1 John 5:5

Believers are overcomers.

Those who no longer believe, are no longer overcomers.

Believing is the qualifying factor in overcoming.


JLB
 
Back
Top