• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Good Works that insult the Cross.

-
Ive created no duplicity.

Ive said that if you believe in Vain, you have not been born again, yet.
And if Paul says the Gospel is what saves you and you are to stand on the Gospel as the means through Faith by which everyone can be saved, then i agree, as that is the truth.
Notice he is clearly teaching that if a person (or anyone in this group) hears in vain they are not saved, and if anyone will hear with faith they are SAVED by believing the Gospel, as long as they have not "heard in vain"..(didnt mix faith with their hearing).
Paul is very clear here......nothing foggy about it.
You're not answering my question.

This is a debate, and I'm challenging your doctrine to explain how it is that for people who haven't believed in vain, but who really did believe, that the 'you are saved if you hold fast the word' just goes away and is not a condition for them to be saved.


"1Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain." (1 Corinthians 15:1-2 NASB bold mine)

Continuing faith is indeed a requirement to be saved. But hyper-grace says that those who have truly believed are saved even if they don't hold fast the word. It insists there are no conditions whatsoever for the believer to be saved once they truly believe in the gospel, not even the condition to continue believing in the gospel. It says you are irretrievably saved even if you go back to unbelief. But as we can plainly see, this is complete contradiction to what Paul says.
 
-
Did you notice that some departed from the Faith, but Paul does not say they are lost, or on their way to hell?
That is interesting isnt it?
Did you ever study that?
So, you have to read into that scripture what you are implying that it is saying, to get your theology out of it.

Listen, JLB, Born Again believers depart from the faith all the time.
Often its because of some tragedy that they blame God for not rescuing them from, or their child, perhaps.
The get bitter, they hate God, they blame God, and there way to deal with it is to hate God, and hold him accountable.
They have departed the faith, but God has not departed them, and the Blood of Jesus has not stopped keeping them redeemed.
The thing is, the blood of Jesus does not stop working on behave of a born again Saint, simply because that Child of God turns out bad, or worse.

Those who have a crisis of faith and stumble, God knows and deeply cares for them and will receive them back if they repent, and return to Him.

The parable of the prodigal son is one of my favorites, and describes me well.

Here's some context for the prodigal son, which shows some points that Jesus made just before he taught about the prodigal son.

From Luke 15:

4 “What man of you, having a hundred sheep, if he loses one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness, and go after the one which is lost until he finds it? 5 And when he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing. 6 And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost!’ 7 I say to you that likewise there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine just persons who need no repentance.
Luke 15:4-7

The sheep that was in the flock of the Shepherd, was lost and likened to a "sinner" who needed to repent.

again

It was right that we should make merry and be glad, for your brother was dead and is alive again, and was lost and is found.’”
Luke 15:32


Here is what I see in what the Spirit says in 1 Timothy that is so dangerous, concerning our eternal destiny.

Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, 1 Timothy 4:1-2


When the heart is in this condition, we are in great danger of not being able to return to God.


Paul [or the writer of the book of Hebrews] explains it this way to the Hebrews -

12 Beware, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God; 13 but exhort one another daily, while it is called “Today,” lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. 14 For we have become partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end, Hebrews 3:12-14


Please consider these things.


Ask Reba about her family member, who was a faithful Christian...





JLB
 
-
Actually, when you are hearing Paul preach the Gospel while the Holy Spirit is enlightening you by conviction, is absolutely "sinning willfully"< as you are willfully rejecting Christ, and that is to "do despite to the Spirit of Grace, and to trodden under foot the Son of God and his Blood.,".
All of this is to willfully and knowingly reject Christ when you KNEW it was the Truth.
Hebrews has quite a lot to say about this type of willfully resisting the Holy Spirit when you are being convicted and know what you should do, but WONT.
You left out the "the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified" part (Hebrews 10:29 NASB).
He's talking to the believing, sanctified by the blood of Christ believers in the Hebrew church, not unbelievers. Faith is how the blood of Christ is applied. These people have faith. The author is warning them about falling away from their faith in Christ in a willful return to sin. If they do that, they will be condemned along with the unbelievers (Hebrews 10:26-27 NASB). But hyper-grace says they will not be.
 
No, your scripture posted does not say that someone has been born again, it says you received the knowledge of the Gospel, and kept on sinning....that is you kept on refusing to believe it.
> Christ Rejector<.
Kidron,
You brought up Hebrews 10:26, not me.

However, you seem to be missing the point of that scripture.

Hebrews 10:26
Start with verses 21 and 22:
Paul is saying that we're to go to God fully trusting in Him to receive us because we have been sprinkled with Christ's blood, because he is our High Priest.

verse 23
We can look forward to the salvation Christ has promised us. We have no doubt and we can even tell others that salvation is ours. God is able to do what He has promised - save us.

verse 24
Since God has been so good to us, let us outdo each other:
In being helpful to each other
In being kind to each other
In doing good

Verse 25
Let us go to church
Let us encourage each other

Verse 26
If anyone deliberately keeps on sinning by rejecting the Savior AFTER KNOWING the truth of forgiveness...

So. The person is rejecting Christ AFTER KNOWING the truth.
Do the verses prior to 26 sound to you like someone who did NOT know the gospel and the goodness of Christ?

Do you understand what KNOWING means in the bible?
Adam KNEW Eve.

It goes even beyong what we today understand the word "knowing" to mean. It means to know in a deep and intimate way. So yes, they did know the gospel, they fell away from it, they rejected Christ AFTER they had known the truth.

This is worse than never having known it - 2 Peter 2:20-22.

If you feel the above is incorrect, please explain your understanding of Hebrews 10:26.

Wondering
 
Rejecting Christ and sinning willfully are two different concepts.
Hebrews 10:26 is speaking about someone who did NOT reject Christ, but accepted Him and believed, but kept on sinning anyway.

It's saying that it's possible to sin after being saved and thus lose salvation.
A very uncomfortable thought for some,
But not for those who wish to PERSEVERE in their faith until the end.

W
Hebrews 10:26 does not speak of anyone being saved and losing their salvation.
The writer is pointing out the apostasy of receiving such knowledge.
We need to know what is wrong if we are to understand what is wrong.
This knowledge is not given to us not as a law, such as the Law of Moses, but rather as knowledge, period, so we can understand our own position better.
 
You're not answering my question.

This is a debate, and I'm challenging your doctrine to explain how it is that for people who haven't believed in vain, but who really did believe, that the 'you are saved if you hold fast the word' just goes away and is not a condition for them to be saved.



I did answer you.
Paul is making the distinction between those who didnt believe, (unless you believed in vain), with those who are saved, who actually believed.
He's saying....."those of you who held fast (didnt believe in vain) are standing firm because they have BELIEVED.... and those of you who believed in vain, (didnt mix faith with their hearing) are not saved.

So, standing firm, = believed= saved.

While "believed in vain", = not standing firm, not yet saved.
 
Hebrews 10:26 does not speak of anyone being saved and losing their salvation.
The writer is pointing out the apostasy of receiving such knowledge.
We need to know what is wrong if we are to understand what is wrong.
This knowledge is not given to us not as a law, such as the Law of Moses, but rather as knowledge, period, so we can understand our own position better.
What exactly does this mean:
Hebrews 10:26
"For if we go on sinning willfully after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins." NASB

It sounds to me like someone knew the truth, kept on willfully sinning after knowing it, and so now there remains no sacrifice for their sins since they've forsaken the only sacrifice known that can save.

This is my understanding of the verse.

W
 
I did answer you.
Paul is making the distinction between those who didnt believe, (unless you believed in vain), with those who are saved, who actually believed.
He's saying....."those of you who held fast (didnt believe in vain) are standing firm because they have BELIEVED.... and those of you who believed in vain, (didnt mix faith with their hearing) are not saved.

So, standing firm, = believed= saved.

While "believed in vain", = not standing firm, not yet saved.
You're avoiding my question.
Of course 'unless you believed in vain' makes the condition for being saved irrelevant to you. But how does not really believing in the gospel make it so the 'if' condition for salvation does not apply to true believers?

"you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you" (1 Corinthians 15:2 NASB)
 
-
Once you become a family member in God's family, your behavior does not determine later, if you are stay in it.
Here, go and body slam your mother and stab your father..
(not really), but, if you do Kill mama and daddy are you no longer their Son?
Then figure this out with regards to GOD BEING YOUR FATHER, and realize that you dont stop being a SON just because you are a horrible son.
So, you do not repent so that God accepts you over and over, as if you are lost every other day.
The reality is, you are born again into the family of God, and you stay there.
If you are not a good Son, then this has no effect on your position as a family member, as its the Blood Atonment that has created you to be accepted by the Father, and you cant remove this simply because you are in a bitter mess, or because you are angry at God, or because you backslide and stay there.
See, you have falsely concluded that you can get rid of the Blood of Jesus, once its been applied.
The reality is, you cant, and this is why you dont "hold out to the end", for something that is already occurred = born again.

For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; 2 Peter 2:4


The sons of God were cast into hell, and continue to be sons of God while in hell, as God is the Father of all spirits.

9 Furthermore, we have had human fathers who corrected us, and we paid them respect. Shall we not much more readily be in subjection to the Father of spirits and live? Hebrews 12:9

God is the Father of all spirits, angels and humans.


JLB
 
-
Of course..
Look at that phrase....."there no longer remaineth a sacrifice for sins", as this is KEY.
And WHO and WHAT is the sacrifice for sins?
Its Jesus and His Blood........and so, IF you go on REJECTING THIS, (The Gospel), then God cant SAVE YOU , as you have REJECTED THE MEANS TO BE SAVED, = NO .... MORE.......SACRIFICE ........FOR .........YOUR.........SINS..........AS YOU HAVE rejected REDEMPTION....You have rejected the SACRIFICE that GOD offers.
And THAT is how you Reject Christ and """nail him afresh to the cross, and trodden under foot his Blood and Him"".
As THAT is what the people who hung Him on the Cross did.......they WILLINGLY and WILLFULLY REJECTED HIM.
So, if Paul is telling you that to reject Christ, is to reject the conviction of the Holy Spirit , = IS TO BE JUST LIKE THOSE WHO NAILED HIM UP, = "to crucify him AFRESH", is what you are doing......and Paul is WARNING THEM Not to do this, as if they continue then they are become just like those
who actually Hung Christ up on the Cross, (Pharisees).
So, Paul is comparing rejecting the Gospel, when the Holy Spirit is "enlightening you", = is to be just like those who saw Jesus, heard Jesus, and witnessed the miracles and KNEW THE TRUTH< and Killed Him anyway.
Paul is saying that a Christ Rejecter, under conviction of the Holy Spirit, is JUST LIKE THOSE WHO HUNG JESUS ON THE TREE.
They are doing it "AFRESH."

That is what Paul is showing you and explaining in Hebrews.

If I am a Christ rejecter,
HOW am I doing it afresh?

Afresh means AGAIN.
It means I didn't believe
Then I believed
Then I didn't believe again
I didn't believe AFRESH.

W
And the above does NOT explain Hebrews 10:26
 
As i have explained now, 3x.

Paul is making the distinction between the saved and the unsaved, by referring to the saved as those who have held fast (believed and were saved).....and the unsaved who (heard in vain) and are not saved.


He has plainly proven you to be mistaken.

...by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you.

Your saved if you hold fast...


JLB
 
You know Kidron, Jospeh Prince is a nice guy. I like him too. Problem is that he and Jesus don't quite agree and I tend to believe Jesus more.

Faith without works is dead.
James 2:14-26

Jesus said to love our neighbor, go to church, feed the hungry, clothe the poor, be the salt of the earth, be the light of the world, He gave a whole sermon called The Beatitudes, He even told us how to pray, how to fast.

Did He not know what He was talking about??? What you believe would be funny, if it weren't so sad.

We here are not ADDING something for salvation or initial justification. What we're saying is that you must hold firm to your salvation and persevere till the end.
Mathew 16:24

Sorry, I know you don't like the gospel of Mathew. Jesus actually says you have to DO things there.

W
May I ask a question?
How do you hold firm to your salvation and persevere to the end?
Do you have some secret formula or do you just get lucky?
 
May I ask a question?
How do you hold firm to your salvation and persevere to the end?
Do you have some secret formula or do you just get lucky?
Good question.
Easy answer.
You hold firm to your salvation and persevere till the end by faith in the atoning sacrifice of the cross.
There must be, however, some visible sign of this.
Is someone saved, and do they have faith and love for God, if they just continue living as they always lived?
I think you'd agree that the answer to that is NO. Some visible change must be present.

Not only those who cry Lord Lord will get into heaven but those who do the will of the Father.
The will of the Father is to BELIEVE in Jesus.
To BELIEVE means to adhere to, to trust, to follow , to learn from.

WHAT did Jesus teach?

It's in my post no. 64. It's not even a set formula. Everyone is different. God knows each one individually. But a change is a must.

This seems to me to be the reason Jesus came. To offer Himself as a sacrifice for the sins of the world,
and to bring the Kingdom of God to earth. The Kingdom can only be achieved through "works." DOING what the Lord would have us to do.

Persevering till the end means not abandoning the Lord and doing His will.

W
 
Paul is making the distinction between the saved and the unsaved, by referring to the saved as those who have held fast (believed and were saved).....and the unsaved who (heard in vain) and are not saved.
If you are saying that the distinction Paul is making is that the saved hold fast the word how is it that you can insist that the saved who do not hold fast the word are still saved?

"you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you" (1 Corinthians 15:2 NASB)
 
Hello,

and no, we are not saved by faith.
We are saved by GOD, through Christ's BLOOD Atonement, that is released to us to save us, when we believe by Faith, the Gospel.
Think of it this way...
"Faith", is the transmission device THROUGH WHICH God redeems you with Christ's Blood.
So, its the Blood of Christ and God who are the "Savior" who flow through (once and for all) your Faith in the very instant you first BELIEVED. = "born again".
Your Faith released God to SAVE YOU, but your faith of itself does not save you, so dont put your belief in your faith to keep you saved, as its not your faith that saved you.
Instead put your faith in GOD who saved you through Christ's atonement, and trust HIM to keep you saved and not your faith.
That is Salvation and to understand salvation is to understand WHO saved you, HOW they saved you, and from what you have been saved "from".

Give me a moment to try and reword a bit or too. Not to insult you, I'm just trying to be sure I am understanding correctly. Because if I am, I think I can understand and relate to the idea of having faith in God, not in our amounts of faith.

When you say we need to not have faith in faith. Are you equating faith to another action that we do? Another work to be justified by? If that's the case then I think I see where there's merit in that thought. Not just the verse that we are saved by the grace of God, and that no one comes to God on their own, but God chooses them, and draws them to Him. These verses put our salvation in God's hands, and some even point to the perspective of putting our entire lives into God's hands. And while that's true and held by the words in the bible, with relation to works and faith, I have seen many versions of the perspective that a person does not have enough faith. They still are not right by God because they don't have enough faith, pray with enough belief, or are critized by their lack of faith because of their evidant troubles in their lives. By these perspectives and the different versions of the idea of using faith as an action we do, I think I see your reason for distancing your words from faith in faith alone, or that we are saved by God, not by our actions of faith.

If I have that right, please let me know, if it is not what you meant, then please let me know what you actually meant.

That said, I think I need an explaination for what I mean by faith. When I say faith, I mean faith in God. Not faith in fervorent belief. But more then that faith has become a bigger concept then that too. It can be summed up that faith is trust, and the two words are interchangeable.

When we read God's word and say we believe, but don't act on it. It shows a very different face then trust. Like when we listen to our father or mother who have lived longer then us and hold wisdom we might not have. When we don't act on what they say, we can't say we believed them, or can't say we trusted their advise. So how can we say that about anything else? If I say I have faith in my brother, it is a gratitude of trust towards my brother, and even if I don't know what he does or how it does it I trust his judgment and trust him as a whole. In that way faith in God is not just following God, but trusting God in His wisdom, and in how He deals with anything. These two forms of faith from faith in following them, to faith in trusting them as a whole are both interchangeable with trusting them by following what they say, and trusting them as a person.

This perspective of faith being trust takes the argument out of faith verses works. Because if we do not actually act on what God says, then that is a sign against either our understanding of what was said, to be able to act on it; or it is a sign against our faith to believe in God's teachings and direction.

If we trust in God to be our friend, our Father, and our Savior, then we don't need to also trust His rationelle and follow Him. And if we trust in God's teachings and try to follow them, then we don't need to trust that God has our back too, but that we need to earn and prove ourselves. But I think the truth is that we need to both trust God's direction and live in that by our actions, as well as believe and trust in Him to be our salvation, our long lasting friend, and the Father that holds us tightly as any loving father does to their children.
 
Closed for review.
 
I deleted a number of posts in this discussion thread. Some were removed because the post presented an argument rather than furthering the debate. In other words, if you're post was removed on these grounds it was because you just posted an argument without referencing the Scripture that supports your view. This is the A&T forum and the topic is the Word of God not our experiences or our own understandings. Discussion in this forum precludes that points and counterpoints be supported by Scripture. Otherwise, there is only arguing and not debate. The ultimate goal is to dig into the Word and gain a deeper understanding to grow in our faith.

Other posts were removed because they referenced a deleted post and that would get too confusing. Please apply the Forum Guidelines when posting. Present your counterpoints with supportive Scripture to show why you believe what you do.
 
"you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you" (1 Corinthians 15:2 NASB)

Yes, you are saved if you believe.....as to "hold fast", is to believe, is to "exercise faith", in the message you are hearing, as "faith cometh by hearing".
This is explained in the parable of Jesus where he refers to a message as "seed", and the ground as the "heart".
So, Paul is casting the seed of the Gospel, (word i preached to to you), and some "held fast", ..that is this seed took root in their hearts, by faith....(they believed) .whereas in the case of others, the seed didnt root, as it "fell on the stony-thorny ground".
 
Yes, you are saved if you believe.....as to "hold fast", is to believe, is to "exercise faith", in the message you are hearing, as "faith cometh by hearing".
This is explained in the parable of Jesus where he refers to a message as "seed", and the ground as the "heart".
So, Paul is casting the seed of the Gospel, (word i preached to to you), and some "held fast", ..that is this seed took root in their hearts, by faith....(they believed) .whereas in the case of others, the seed didnt root, as it "fell on the stony-thorny ground".

That's just it, the seed that fell among the rocky ground, did receive the seed, and the seed did in fact spring up, because these in this example did believe... for a while.

They were believers for a while, then they no longer believed.

12 Those by the wayside are the ones who hear; then the devil comes and takes away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved.13 But the ones on the rock are those who, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, who believe for a while and in time of temptation fall away. Luke 8:12-13


Believe = Saved
Believe for a while = saved for a while.

Believers who later no longer believe, are no longer believers, as they have returned to unbelieving.



JLB
 
1 Peter 1:25
But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.

In these various observations seemingly endless tensions, disputes and divisions arise.

In the opening post, the poster postures that believers are saved regardless of works, and that if others posture that good works are required to be saved, and if not, then no salvation, then the commands for good works has defeated salvation if these cards are not in hand. But he argues that salvation itself, once procured or received, is secure. Others posture the opposing side, that no, no one is saved unless they meet various forms of ever continuing criteria. They are only "saved in the now" IF they have all the salvation cards in their own hands. This most often includes "works" to prove all these salvation cards are still in the hands of the receiver.

The reality for every believer factually resides between these two postures. What all parties to these various debates always overlook is that NO MAN has only good works.

Proof texts?

Romans 3:23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

That covers past tense. Sinned means have already done it. Sinned in the past.

How about the present tense?

1 John 1:
8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

Have sin is a present tense application. Paul shows us this same thing in Romans 7:17-21, proving that sin dwelt in his own flesh and that evil was therefore present with him. This is also Paul's basis of understanding that the flesh is against and contrary to the Spirit, from Gal. 5:17.

Paul concludes from this that God in Christ came to save sinners, 1 Tim. 1:15, even concluding that "I am" the chief of same, after salvation no less.

So let's examine the frailties of both sides of the postures. The opening poster requests that Gods Eternal Adverse Judgements against all sin and evil, which ARE a promise of the Gospel be abandoned entirely. The other side of the debate can't accept that. I wouldn't accept that either. We know for no uncertain fact that the Spirit is contrary to and against the flesh from Gal. 5:17. We also know for no uncertain fact that God in Christ is not the proponent of sin or of evil.

So the "potentially lose your salvation crowd" has devised various schemes in which God in Christ looks like this:

View attachment 9325

If a believers good works are sufficient to over balance the scales more than their evil works, then they're in. And in the goods works side they place in a varied concoction of what qualifies and what doesn't which is entirely arbitrary and shifting according to their own particular and individual demands.

The other side has an entirely different posture that looks more like this:



It should be rather obvious to anyone honestly assessing this constant debate that no amounts of "good works" is going to make anyone sinless. There are many scriptural barriers to the good works are required for salvation side of the debate that this crowd can't legitimately address. Here for example:

2 Corinthians 5:
19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.

That only leaves the questions of Eternal Adverse Judgments of God as it pertains to believers, hanging. And the first poster doesn't address this in his posture. Fortunately scripture does address this. IN 2 Cor. 12:7 Paul provides us an intimately look at his own construction in the flesh:

2 Corinthians 12:
7 And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.

Jesus gives us the identical picture here:

Mark 4:
15 And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.

John gives us this same identical picture here:

1 John 3:
8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

That's why the answers to these kinds of questions reside somewhere between the two sides. God in Christ WILL have His Salvation of believers, not counting sins against them. And God in Christ WILL also exact Eternal Adverse Judgments on our ADVERSARY, the devil, who is also involved in this mess of sin and evil.

The basic lesson in these matters are these:

->Don't be a pawn of our adversary in the flesh.
->Don't think that any amount of "good works" is going to offset the fact that Eternal Adverse Judgments do apply to that adversary.

If the above factual sights are inserted into this debate, we will discover that our adversary is also a part of the narratives of The Word. And neither side has any account of that matter whatsoever.
 
Back
Top