I realize that you're upset. There is an attitude that come from you that I pick up on. I'm just being honest. This is what I'm writing about. This is your statement....
Maybe I am upset. But more than being upset, I think I am more disappointed than anything. But your right, I have an attitude, and I'm sure you can pick up on it. I thank you for your honesty, and now I hope you will be able to accept a little honesty back.
"That is what YOU WANT?? YOU WANT me to discover??
I told you the reason Chopper. So that you would not glory in my knowledge. I wanted you to glory in the Lord. Period. Maybe you are not mature enough yet to understand that.
The reason that I don't want to answer your questions is that because I'm well read & knowledgeable on most theological, spiritual, and doctrinal issues both in the Old Covenant and New Covenant. In order to answer your questions I'd have to write a book and send it to you or my answers would be to long for any Forum. To give a simple answer? Not my way anymore.
Honesty? All I see is your pride working here. The reason you don't want to answer is that you would have to write a book? Seriously? Would it have to contain foot notes of all the commentaries and devotionals? Well, Chopper, if that is what it takes for you to answer one of my questions, then in all honesty, you do not have to answer them because I am not interested in hearing the doctrines and traditions of men.
Now this question I asked had to do with the thief on the cross, who was crucified with Christ. Now this thief knew the Truth, but he only played such a brief and tiny role. But after 40 years as a pastor and teacher, you don't want to answered the question, or you can't?
You see Chopper, you and
Soul man are leading a study on the Death of the Cross. I can see much value in that. BUT, neither you nor Soul man has yet to explain, or rather give an account of your own personal faith in how you reckon yourself dead with Christ. How do you understand your own walk of Faith by being crucified with Christ? I'm sorry you don't like these questions, but I'm not going to find the answers in some theologians book. I'm asking you to give account for your faith that lies within, and you won't.
But you want answers. And so I'll give you the answer. But an answer without the question or context, I'm sure will be meaningless.
We are GUILTY, but he is innocent.
I welcome your comments. Instead of asking me a question, you make the statement, or answer, and we can discuss that. I'll let you know if I agree or not. Are you afraid you might be wrong? Remember, I'm a Psychologist and pick up on attitudes and fears.
It is certainly good to know that my comments are still welcome, but if you are asking if I might be afraid because I am wrong, then you really don't know me as well as you think. If I was afraid I might be wrong, would I post a great secret of the cross and say that the Father Answered the Prayer of Jesus, and that He did not have to drink of the cup. Father, If this cup might pass.... And when he cried, He Heard. Does any of your books discuss this?
So now you have reminded me that you are a psychologist, and you pick up fears and attitudes. So you have a degree in the science and study of the influence of the flesh nature.
I know you don't like questions, but tell me if you can. If You are dead with Christ and are dead to your flesh; and If I am dead with Christ and am dead to my flesh: then why do you want to glory in my flesh?
We should, as Brothers in Christ, have a good relationship. Now you know how I operate, please respect that.
I agree. You also know how I operate. I give commentary in my posts. I quote scripture in my posts, I ask questions in my posts. Please respect that.
You are not obligated to answer my questions. In fact you don't have to read my comments at all. That is entirely up to you.
But I will remind you of something I told you a long time ago. My interest was not in bringing people to the cross and to their death. My interest was in listening for the voice that calls them back from the dead.