not that I disagree ,wouldn't a right be negated by a permit of demonstrated proficiency to use?I agree and would go as far to say that, that is part of being well regulated. Governmental sensationalism and agendas aside, Firearms are deadly so there is an implied sense of duty that goes to the handler of any arm when they pick it up.
You never implied reckless abandon, lol. And you didn't have to mention it regardless because it is a given for safety with weapons and you know that, so I don't understand why they picking on you like that?
Maybe it's the old, those who can, do...those who can't, teach. (Lol). It's good we have that cleared up in this thread now. It is a given that there is no reckless abandon. Minimum competence and previous exposure to weapons a requirement to enter. It takes Wisdom, Temperance and the grace of God to have hold of ready arms.
we can't drive or fly or operate a vessel without a license .
do keep in mind the cliche of the idiots who buy an misuse or abuse something and a law is passed.