• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

How do we determine which parts of the Bible to be literal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave Slayer
  • Start date Start date
D

Dave Slayer

Guest
How do we determine which parts of the Bible to be literal? Many say that the book of Revelations isn't to be taken literally because it is a symbolic book. But the Gospels are said to be literal.
 
The best thing to do is to just read the texts in context. Most of the time this will clear the issue of whether to take what is written literally or not. Straight documentation, a text where someone is speaking about something that happened, should be taken literally.

When the text begins to take a poetic turn or starts using a lot of metaphor or imagery, then one needs to seek what is behind any symbolism.

As far as Revelations is concerned, I really think the first 3 Chapters are to be taken quite literally. I do believe that John wrote letters to real churches that really did say exactly what Christ wanted them to say.

The rest of it though, when John begins to relate visions of future or past events, and it becomes filled with imagery and metaphors, well then, we can seek what might be. For instance, I believe that Revelations 6:12 is speaking metaphorically.

This isn't going to answer all questions or criticisms, Dave. Folks are still going to argue. But, it makes sense to me to look at it this way.
 
I see the whole Book of Revelation as literal and symbolic and I have posted why in other threads; to include the seven churches as well as the first three chapters.

So much of the NT is not literal and it is more then just poetry that might be a key, much of the NT is spiritual. Look at Hebrews; what is the Tabernacle of David, the Parable of Lazarus to just mention a few.
 
The NT is literal and Revelations is symbolically literal.
 
About ten years ago, I bought a book called Revelation,God's Word For The Biblically-Inept, just a great, great book for the study of the book of Revelations. Jack Van Impe, Hal Lindsey, John Hagee, and Grant R. Jeffrey, break it down for you through out the book. Let me put it this way they break down what can be broken down. You can get this book dirt cheap now, like a few bucks.
 
The problem with study is how are you studying? Are you hearing what God's spirit is saying or are you following the religion you believe in. Most ignore God, ir the Christ with in you. They are anti Christ.

The God of the present is dead to people like this; they believe in a God of the future, and one in the past; but the spirit of God with them has no impact on what God's Word declares. This is why we have literalist; it is always nice to stand on solid earth. they have only experernce truth "knee deep".

Ezekiel 47: 4Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through the waters; the waters were to the knees. Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through; the waters were to the loins.

5Afterward he measured a thousand; and it was a river that I could not pass over: for the waters were risen, waters to swim in, a river that could not be passed over.





follower of Christ said:
[quote="Dave Slayer":1ntpflb9]How do we determine which parts of the Bible to be literal?
study...[/quote:1ntpflb9]
 
There are many types of the kingdom of God in the Old Testament. The broadest and most all-inclusive type is the land of Canaan. The land is frequently referred to as the good land. The Lord called it “a good land†and “an exceeding good land.†What a beautiful description that is of the spiritual territory of the kingdom of God!

The land is good in its unsearchable abundance. First of all it is rich in water. “For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys and hills†(Deut. 8:7).

These waters are types/examples of various kinds of supply of the Christ-life out of the inner sanctum of our spirit. Jesus said that He would give us water to drink that we never thirst again, and that this water would be in us an artesian well of water springing up unto eternal life. On another occasion the Lord tells us that this living water would flow out of our innermost being as the rushing of mighty rivers. This is the supply of the Christ-life, the spirit within as living water! Early in our experience we realize we are thirsty, not thirsty in our body for natural water, but thirsty in our soul for the water of life! When we are thirsty it means that our soul is dry, there is a lack of quality of life. But when we come athirst to the spirit and contact the spiritual life of God in the spirit, we are refreshed and quickened  we are watered! The deep and terrible thirst in our soul is quenched! We are refreshed by the life of the spirit more than by any cold water or beverage on earth!


1 Corin 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for examples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world (age) are come. example

Example: NT:5178 a : Strong’s: tupikos (toop-ee-kos'); an adverb related to NT:5179; found only in 1 Cor 10:11: as a warning, by way of example, typologically (i.e. figuratively, as a prophetic type, a typological interpretation of Scripture)
 
Benoni said:
The problem with study is how are you studying? Are you hearing what God's spirit is saying or are you following the religion you believe in. Most ignore God, ir the Christ with in you. They are anti Christ.

The God of the present is dead to people like this; they believe in a God of the future, and one in the past; but the spirit of God with them has no impact on what God's Word declares. This is why we have literalist; it is always nice to stand on solid earth. they have only experernce truth "knee deep".

Ezekiel 47: 4Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through the waters; the waters were to the knees. Again he measured a thousand, and brought me through; the waters were to the loins.

5Afterward he measured a thousand; and it was a river that I could not pass over: for the waters were risen, waters to swim in, a river that could not be passed over.





follower of Christ said:
[quote="Dave Slayer":367i6iuf]How do we determine which parts of the Bible to be literal?
study...
[/quote:367i6iuf]

Very nice Benoni. I agree with both you and FOC. The more one studies the more is revealed by the Spirit. But, as you said, there are those that don't hear or see what is being revealed.
 
Benoni said:
The problem with study is how are you studying? Are you hearing what God's spirit is saying or are you following the religion you believe in.
...from FoCs signature:
Study earnestly to present yourself approved to God, a workman that does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth. -Paul, Christs chosen apostle
Those who hear and heed Gods word hear God Himself for He gave His word to His people.
 
Those who hear and heed Gods word hear God Himself for He gave His word to His people.

You your self admit you are a literelist; so you only hear the literal. So far anytime I have mentioned the spiritual Word you do not reply?

Only up to you knees
 
Dave Slayer said:
How do we determine which parts of the Bible to be literal? Many say that the book of Revelations isn't to be taken literally because it is a symbolic book. But the Gospels are said to be literal.

I read the Bible in overall context.
 
Why would a book as serious as Revelation be metaphorical or symbolic. I can understand Psalms/song of songs being metaphorical, you can only say I love you God so many times before its redundant and you come up with different and artful ways to say it, but Revelation, the end of our days, why not make it black and white dry cut LITERAL. Its seems like all the other Prophecies are literal

Born of a virgin,

Born in Bethlehem

The rejection of the Messiah by the people


on and on and on and its VERY SUPER clear. So why not make Revelation clear too? :study
 
ChevyRodeo said:
Why would a book as serious as Revelation be metaphorical or symbolic. I can understand Psalms/song of songs being metaphorical, you can only say I love you God so many times before its redundant and you come up with different and artful ways to say it, but Revelation, the end of our days, why not make it black and white dry cut LITERAL. Its seems like all the other Prophecies are literal

Born of a virgin,

Born in Bethlehem

The rejection of the Messiah by the people


on and on and on and its VERY SUPER clear. So why not make Revelation clear too? :study

No ,,,,its full of symbolic meaning and its easy to follow..... :study
 
Back
Top