Being that I once was a christian, I think it is important to tell the side of the story of those who deconverted, not due to "rebellion", but due to LOOKING at all of the information available and coming to a conclusion. I'm not ruling out the posibility of there being deities, just haven't seen credible evidence from those who promote it. And for a "how do you know god is real" thread, I believe it serves nothing good to have a thread full of "yes (wo)men". If evidence is sound, it should be able to stand. But, . . . see my first signature line.
Where I understand that you firmly believe this [and have every right to], . . . having been IN the christian faith for over 30 years, being "okay with it" when I hadn't taken the time to do my own studies [in other words, letting people tell me what to believe AND how to believe it, thus relying solely on pastors and Sunday school teachers to feed me the bible and what they wanted to pull from scripture and how they wanted us to hear it], . . . when I began having problems with what I was seeing in differing viewpoints [on the web], and when [upon seeking help from church leadership about the problems, being told to read the bible and let it speak to me] I started to delve seriously into the bible, what I found didn't seem at all to be a "story of love" as I was led to believe. Even the story of "the death of Jesus".
This is just me being honest in a thread that asks what the OP asked. As I said, on the surface [and for the years I was a christian, weeping over my "sin" and how it was the cause of Jesus's death] it sounds like a good story. The bottom line, however [IMO] sullies it.
It could be that I just think differently than people who call this site "home". I don't mean any disrespect, but I think it is important that christians know "the other side". What I have said here is quite tame compared to what I have seen. I don't like seeing THAT level of derision because I know that christains ARE good people! I have christian friends and they are top notch. It is just that for some people, extraordinary claims really DO require extraordinary evidence, and for a thread like this one, I would have hoped that extraordinary evidence would have been given. If it happens, I'll gladly consider it.