Arch Angle
Member
- Feb 3, 2011
- 241
- 0
Iagree with you are saying here. Again, this is a different issue to me. That we need to be careful with skewing data to match our perceptions. I agree 100%with you.
I am only interested if the similarities are 'real" or a "fallacy'. Being of the sort that people are very close to being the same 6000 years ago as they are today, I think the smart guys back then were pretty darn close with the observations they had.
People coming from dirt implies that they saw a process in the formation of man from something else, to"man". And that there may be a hierarchy of structure in what they saw around them. Smaller things interacting to form bigger things. they just didn't know what it was. Like us with dark matter today.
So I don't think the similaritiesare "a fallacy". I think people use the information wrong today. They take it out of context. Were they woefullyincomplete back then? yes, but only because we know so much more.
God doing it, is abelief. I don't believe in a "poof there it is god". But claiming that the people back then saw it as a process in the working of the universe is pretty valid I think. Or at least, not a "fallacy".
I am only interested if the similarities are 'real" or a "fallacy'. Being of the sort that people are very close to being the same 6000 years ago as they are today, I think the smart guys back then were pretty darn close with the observations they had.
People coming from dirt implies that they saw a process in the formation of man from something else, to"man". And that there may be a hierarchy of structure in what they saw around them. Smaller things interacting to form bigger things. they just didn't know what it was. Like us with dark matter today.
So I don't think the similaritiesare "a fallacy". I think people use the information wrong today. They take it out of context. Were they woefullyincomplete back then? yes, but only because we know so much more.
God doing it, is abelief. I don't believe in a "poof there it is god". But claiming that the people back then saw it as a process in the working of the universe is pretty valid I think. Or at least, not a "fallacy".