What "god" then do you believe in?I'm not talking about the "written evidence" I'm talking about the physical. You reject God based on the fact that you reject the "physical" evidence He has given.Orion said:RND said:He has already given you evidence of His existence and his love - but you don't acknowledge it so what should God do?
No, . . . what there IS . . . is the words of what men thousands of years ago stated. That isn't true evidence of who god really is. There is a big difference.
[quote:1w5hiskw]I'm not an atheist.
When you make statements that a baby's voice or a pet unconditional love or a sunset/sunrise are not evidence of God's existence then I would have to conclude you truly don't believe in God.I'm not saying "I don't believe in god".
Fine. Then at least believe in the physical evidence! But not only do you reject His word you reject the physical evidence.I don't take the words of [bronze/iron age] men or the personal convictions of the followers as "who god really is".
[/quote:1w5hiskw] That I already knew. Your problem seems to stem from your complete rejection of God - the written word and the physical evidence.Most of my problems are with what was written and believed for millenias.
Tell me Orion have you ever given much thought that the many people that have discussed God with you over the time you have been on different forums were sent by God to try to get you to change your mind?