• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

If we are completely cleansed of all sin, for which sin will you be Judged?

Re: If we are completely cleansed of all sin, for which sin will you be Judged?

The answer depends whether you are saved or not. Christ’s death on the cross paid for all our sins. If you have accepted him as your savior you will not be judged for those sins, but If you are not saved you will be judged for those sins. As far as works goes it is not works that save it is the gift of salvation for those who accept.
 
That's not what I said. I said, not every word is "TO" every man, not "For" every man. There's a big difference.

Well, let's insert the Word 'by' as well so we have a triumvirate!

Does it really pay to strain over such matters? Isn't Every Word of God unto LIFE for those who adhere to same?

Yeah, let's add 'unto' as well!

You can't say theology isn't fun in some respects.

There's nothing spiritual about it.
Surely you jest? heh heh. 2 2 funny.

John was saying that they, the apostles had seen, heard, and touched Jesus, have you, has every man, has every Christian?
I would say in the spiritual sense, undoubtedly. Tasted as well.

Psalm 34:8
O taste and see that the LORD is good: blessed is the man that trusteth in him.

Can we add 'see' without seeing and 'hear' without hearing to the list?

I understand the futility of trying to force fit spiritual matters to tangible only sights.

In the context of Paul's words. He compares those who are mature with those who are carnal (babes in Christ). This passage alone refutest the idea that every word applys to every person because Paul said some are mature and some are carnal (babes in Christ). He said "some" not every.
Paul himself said he was carnal. Also the 'chiefest of sinners.' Don't you find those statements of fact a bit odd? There were certainly a super abundance of 'sinners' to make comparisons to at the time, yet he deems himself chief of same.

There are spiritual ways to observe these matters of fact, yet not doing one bit of disservice to Paul. Knock yourself out trying to figure that out.

from this answer I can see you see the contradiction presented by that line of reasoning.
There are huge amounts of what may seem 'apparent' contradictions in the text. Could cite pages upon pages of same.

They are placed therein 'on purpose.' Spiritual matters will never make sense to carnal applications, and can't. It is impossible for the carnal mind for example to move into this matter:

Romans 8:7
Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

It will remain impossible for the carnal mind to enter into spiritual understandings.
They're inspired by God bu not the words of God? Can you explain?
Teaching of Apostles is 'inspired' by the Holy Spirit, but are NOT the same as 'direct Words of God.' They 'teach' from a 'lesser' form of speaking. Why? Because such are NOT GOD themselves in making those statements, and speak from the seat of inspiration, of the Spirit. And it is an 'invitation' to 'share' in such matters for us by the same Spirit who brings understandings.

It's a participatory matter for every believer engaged therein, that the Spirit must 'vivify' to the student in order for it to make sense. There we all take a similar 'lesser seat' as they did to learn of these matters to begin with. Paul was not 'instantly enlightened' on every matter nor were any of the other Apostles.

But you said every word is applicable to ever man.

I made no such statement. Cited Luke 4:4. Jesus said what He said. I observe same. What 'reflections' individuals take will obviously vary. I like to think I accept that statement as a basis of understanding, difficult as it may be to engage. I have found 'life' in His Words where others will only see death. Funny how that works sometimes.

In a spiritual sense? Was Jesus only killed in a spiritual sense, of course not.
The death He died was assuredly physical. Yet God did not suffer His Body, The Body of His Image to suffer corruption, but instead glorified same.

Did the Spirit of God die? Uh, no.

This shows that every word cannot be applied to every man.
The only way Jesus' statement of fact can be understood is through the avenue of spiritual understandings. To try to pin any given Word as applicable only to a given man doesn't work and makes Jesus' statement of fact in Luke 4:4 for example, inapplicable. That methodology and approach does not work. But is often employed to DENY Gods Words. That's just a place I can't go.

Every man can learn from every word of God, thus the verse you posted. However, not every word applies to every man.
Yes, and you don't see yourself chasing your own contradicted tail in the above either.

As it pertains to this subject of sin, you understand a believer still has sin, yet it is not counted against us, even while we stand condemned under same.

These are not easy matters to come to grips with. The 'natural' tendency is to sell ourselves out to covers and excuses for our sin and to crawl entirely under and only the Good Side of the Word, when in fact there is WORD also meant to kill, and FOR OUR BENEFIT.

enjoy!

s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mark,

The appeal to many is fallacious. They're not my ideas they're the teaching of Scripture.

Yes, it's the teaching of Scripture...according to your interepretation, and only the the verses you cherry pick. And if an appeal to many is fallacious, why are you linking to the opinions of many?

The truth is, there is NO undisputed interpretation of the Scripture. That's why there are about a dozen MAJOR branches of Christianity, and thousands of MINOR denominations.

So, one again, believe what you want. Your opinions are not definitive for anyone else.
 
The thief on the cross to the right side of Jesus
He simply believed in Jesus
Jesus accepted Him
 
Yes, it's the teaching of Scripture...according to your interepretation, and only the the verses you cherry pick. And if an appeal to many is fallacious, why are you linking to the opinions of many?

The truth is, there is NO undisputed interpretation of the Scripture. That's why there are about a dozen MAJOR branches of Christianity, and thousands of MINOR denominations.

So, one again, believe what you want. Your opinions are not definitive for anyone else.

Again, they are not my interpretations. They are what the Scriptures say, not according to me, but, rather according to those men who walked with the apostles. Are you willing to contend that you have a better understanding of Paul's teaching than Clement who traveled with Paul daily? Would you contend that you have a better understanding of John's teaching than Ignatius who was discipled by John himself? This isn't men giving their opinions of Scripture, this men who walked with the apostles and told us what they were taught by the apostles. It's not interpretations; it's what they learned from the apostles. As I pointed out Ignatius was appointed Bishop of Antioch by Peter, thus his doctrinal positions had Apostolic backing, and Ignatius said a man’s works do bear on his salvation.

Actually, it's the line of thinking that you've presented that is the reason there are so many denominations. It's the thinking that a person can read the Scriptures and whatever understanding they come away with is what the Scriptures are saying. One Christian thinks, I think it means this so that's what it means, and thus we have a new denomination. The Scriptures only mean one thing; they were written to people in the first century and must be understood that way. A Christian in the 21st century reading the Scriptures and applying 21st century concepts to first century writing is not going to have a proper understanding of the Scriptures. Anyone looking at Christianity can see that. Just look at all of the debates OSAS/NOSAS, Free will/Predestination, and so on.

The fact of the matter is, both Jesus and the apostles established the Christian faith or they didn't. If they did then what was first believed and taught is the Christian faith and anything that is different than that is not the Christian faith no matter how cherished a doctrine is. The question is will Christians believe what was taught or will they continue to believe that they can interpret the Scriptures however they see fit.

In regard to the fallaciousness of the appeal to many, I didn't appeal to many, I used the many to show that that argument can be made both for and against your position thereby nullifying the argument. My appeal was to originality, what was originally taught as the Christian faith regarding works that didn't change for 1400 years.
 
Again, they are not my interpretations. They are what the Scriptures say, not according to me, but, rather according to those men who walked with the apostles.


Well, yes, they are your interpretations. I've read those scriptures as well, and I've also read the rest of the Bible. I take my understanding from the entirety of the Bible, not just a few verses you pick out.




Actually, it's the line of thinking that you've presented that is the reason there are so many denominations.

And I imagine that bothers the heck out of you. Well, that's too bad, but, you're missing the point: I don 't care what your opinion is. The fact that you want to play modern day Pharisee is amusing to me, but nothing more.

Perhaps you can concentrate on working out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
 
[/FONT]

Well, yes, they are your interpretations. I've read those scriptures as well, and I've also read the rest of the Bible. I take my understanding from the entirety of the Bible, not just a few verses you pick out.

Once again, it's not my interpretation as I have shown several times now. I don't proof text or cherry pick verses of Scripture. If you think you can prove the faith alone doctrine please do, however, I would suggest that all passages be in context since you use the entire Bible. I would also suggest that your argument follows normal grammatical rules.




And I imagine that bothers the heck out of you. Well, that's too bad, but, you're missing the point: I don 't care what your opinion is. The fact that you want to play modern day Pharisee is amusing to me, but nothing more.

Perhaps you can concentrate on working out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

It doesn't bother me at all. Presenting Ad hominems is a typical response when Christians are faced with Scripture that contradicts their beliefs rather than questioning their beliefs.

I look forward to your argument.
 
Once again, it's not my interpretation as I have shown several times now. I don't proof text or cherry pick verses of Scripture. If you think you can prove the faith alone doctrine please do, however, I would suggest that all passages be in context since you use the entire Bible. I would also suggest that your argument follows normal grammatical rules.

Yes, you can show whatever you want, and, once again, you can believe anything you want. But, I'm not trying to convince YOU of anything. My beliefs are my beliefs, and if you disagree...oh, well, I really don't care.






It doesn't bother me at all. Presenting Ad hominems is a typical response when Christians are faced with Scripture that contradicts their beliefs rather than questioning their beliefs.

It SEEMS to have bothered you. I've told you - several times - I don't care what you believe, you can belive whatever you want, and yet here you are...again, demanding dueling Scriptures. I've also told you - several times - that I don't depend ONLY on literal readings of 2000 year old writings, and yet here you are...again, stuck in your literal readings of 2000 year old writngs, like a good Pharisee.

Sorry, not only don't your opinions impress me, your aggression doesn't either. Let me guess, in real life most people just get up and walk away fom you.
 
He was under the old convenant as Jesus was still alive.

if the thief is under the old covenant (of which you are correct) is he isolated from christain salvation
will he be Judged, what does God do with him
 
I look forward to your argument.

After my last message, I've decided that it's best if we just don't trade comments again. It serves no purpose, and it's bdtter that we just agree to disagree rather than have further unpleasantness. I'm not putting you on an ignore list, but I won't be responding to any further comments from you.
 
beating our heads against the wall

you are both correct

Grace and Works

The Jews were under the law of works

The Gentiles lived by Faith not works


Jews as well as Christians will be be consider at the Judgement

one judged by the law the other by grace


this is a misunderstood concept thats been swept under the rug therefore creating confussion
 
Yes, you can show whatever you want, and, once again, you can believe anything you want. But, I'm not trying to convince YOU of anything. My beliefs are my beliefs, and if you disagree...oh, well, I really don't care.








It SEEMS to have bothered you. I've told you - several times - I don't care what you believe, you can belive whatever you want, and yet here you are...again, demanding dueling Scriptures. I've also told you - several times - that I don't depend ONLY on literal readings of 2000 year old writings, and yet here you are...again, stuck in your literal readings of 2000 year old writngs, like a good Pharisee.

Sorry, not only don't your opinions impress me, your aggression doesn't either. Let me guess, in real life most people just get up and walk away fom you.

I'm sorry you think I'm being aggressive, I'm simply stating historical facts. It does seem to me that you are getting upset so maybe it is best we not continue the conversation as you've suggested.
 
After my last message, I've decided that it's best if we just don't trade comments again. It serves no purpose, and it's bdtter that we just agree to disagree rather than have further unpleasantness. I'm not putting you on an ignore list, but I won't be responding to any further comments from you.

Yes, that does seem to be the best course of action. I'm sorry that you've seen the conversation as unpleasant.
 
The Judgment of the Believers' Works (2 Cor. 5:10)
The judgment of the believer's works, not sins, is in question here. These have been atoned for, and are
"remembered no more forever" (Heb. 10:17) but every work must come into judgment, (Matt. 12:36); (Rom.
14:10); (Gal. 6:7); (Eph. 6:8); (Col. 3:24); (Col. 3:25). The result is "reward" or "loss" (of the reward), "but he
himself shall be saved". (1 Cor. 3:11-15).
 
The Judgment of the Believers' Works (2 Cor. 5:10)
The judgment of the believer's works, not sins, is in question here. These have been atoned for, and are
"remembered no more forever" (Heb. 10:17) but every work must come into judgment, (Matt. 12:36); (Rom.
14:10); (Gal. 6:7); (Eph. 6:8); (Col. 3:24); (Col. 3:25). The result is "reward" or "loss" (of the reward), "but he
himself shall be saved". (1 Cor. 3:11-15).

if the result is reward or loss and there is no sin,

this means we are completely cleansed of sin by the Blood of Christ
 
if the thief is under the old covenant (of which you are correct) is he isolated from christain salvation
will he be Judged, what does God do with him

Why would he be isolated from Salvation? He's saved jsut as those who were saved when Jesus said, "Your faith has saved you."
 
Why would he be isolated from Salvation? He's saved jsut as those who were saved when Jesus said, "Your faith has saved you."

the Law was not abolished untill the death of Christ

if this is the case, then the thief was saved

was John the baptist saved?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We sin when we don’t know we’re sinning.
If we walk in the light and have fellowship, we are cleans of all sin.
If we know we have sinned, we confess our sins.
1 John 1:7
But if we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin.
8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

As the Word of God clearly teaches, IF we walk in the light as Jesus is in the light, only then does the blood of Jesus cleanse us from all sin. But i will tell you the Truth, if you are knowingly and willingly committing sins, you are NOT walking in the light as Jesus is in the light, therefore are NOT cleansed. According to the Word of God, you are only cleansed, when you are walking in the light as Jesus walked in the light. How did Jesus walk, walk the same way, and then you will also be cleansed. But continue to live in sins, and you are not cleansed.

^i^
 
Back
Top