Amen, we do also.I pretty much only use the Open Bible KJV as it has so much within it.
Love, Walter and Debbie
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Amen, we do also.I pretty much only use the Open Bible KJV as it has so much within it.
8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.
It is that way in the bible also.Seems like that should end with a question mark and not a period.
In the KJV. It's actually just the opposite in at least 30 other versions/translations.It is that way in the bible also.
In the KJV. It's actually just the opposite in at least 30 other versions/translations.
Hebrews 4:8 - The Sabbath Rest
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.www.biblehub.com
Which other versions?
The same link.Hebrews 4:8 - The Sabbath Rest
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.www.biblehub.com
I don't understand what you mean.The same link.
The versions are the same on the same site.I don't understand what you mean.
Heb 4:8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.Seems like that should end with a question mark and not a period.
AmenHeb 4:8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.
It sounds like it could be a question, but merely a statement of resting one day of the week as in the seventh day sabbath rest as if Jesus was talking about another day of rest he would have mentioned it as another day. Some of these men He was speaking to were in unbelief as they did not understand even after hearing Him preach to them, while others believed and understood. It might help if you go back to Hebrews 4 and start at vs. 1 and read through to vs. 11.
This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. (Psa 118:24 KJV)I don't understand what you mean.
The versions are the same on the same site.
The other day, Jesus spoke of, is when he returned to the believer's future dwelling place, alive for evermore.Well, let's see:
Hebrews 4:8
King James Version
"For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day."
Which is implying that another day was not spoken of afterward.
English Standard Version - (Representative of the other versions)
"For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on."
Which is implying that He did speak of another day later on.
I don't see what that has to do with my post.The other day, Jesus spoke of, is when he returned to the believer's future dwelling place, alive for evermore.
.
You said scripture implies Jesus did speak of another day later. You are right, he did. Quire a lot.i don't see what that has to do with my post.
Well, let's see:
Hebrews 4:8
King James Version
"For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day."
Which is implying that another day was not spoken of afterward.
English Standard Version - (Representative of the other versions)
"For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on."
Which is implying that He did speak of another day later on.
Yes, that is the ESV's implication.You said scripture implies Jesus did speak of another day later. You are right, he did. Quire a lot.
.
No Sir, I do not agree with your statement, because in all of our studies as a Christian the king James version had been proven to be one of the best to use, even with the open edition which brings out more detailed information.Yes, that is the ESV's implication.
But the KJV seems to be saying the opposite.
I agree that many people equate that. I think it is better understood 'to sanctify' or 'set aside'. My understanding is the 'keeping' of the sabbath is a multi-beneficial practice.You equate the word 'holy' as being some formal worship practice. That isn't what 'holy' means.