Indeed to BELIEVE means all of the above. We could clarify that it means TO FOLLOW the person in whom you believe.
No, to "believe" does NOT mean to follow. I gave the lexicon definition for the word. And "to follow" wasn't in it.
If you are PERSUADED of something, youi FOLLOW that ideal.
This is more assumption.
So, if you BELIEVE in Jesus you will be saved and have eternal life.
If you DON'T BELIEVE in Jesus you will NOT be saved and have eternal life.
Is there any verse that says that those who follow me will be saved?
The UNBELIEVING can occur at any time in your life. I posted many verses that say you must endure till the end.
The context for that statement is specific to the Tribulation, not to all of humanity.
We're becoming repetitive.
How true. It's all been said by now. But, if post #803 can be shown to be false, please proceed.
Believe = Saved
Unbelief = Not Saved
Yes, biblical principles.
The Word is very important FreeGrace. But apparently only the Word that YOU choose to believe.
Please show me which words in the Word that I have NOT chosen to believe. And be specific. I think your assumption is appalling.
The above verses which I quoted are NOT important?
This is my view on that from 2 Tim:
16
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,
17 so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
Because you cannot reconcile them with your belief, perhaps?
I've explained and reconciled EVERY verse and passage that has been thrown at me.
Here I was referring to "turning down" the Holy Spirit. Or "denying" the Holy Spirit. Or "rejecting" the Holy Spirit.
Since none of these words or phrases is found in the Bible, please explain your point, as it relates to eternal security.
Any one of these words means that you do NOT DESIRE to have the Holy Spirit in you life.
What verse teaches that it "matters" whether you have the Holy Spirit in your life? Do you believe that you can wish Him out, breaking the seal?? Where does that idea come from? Certainly not Scripture. Oh, that's right. You're into assumptions.
I highlighted 2 Thessalonians 2:13 up above because I'd like to comment on it.
"because God has chosen you from the beginning for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and faith in the truth."
We spoke about Sanctification a few pages back. I explained, and I'm sure you know, that Sanctification is an ONGOING process that lasts your whole life.
Whereas salvation is immediate. btw, how many kinds of sanctification does the Bible speak of?
So, If God has chosen, from the beginning, SALVATION through SANCTIFICATION by the Spirit and FAITH IN THE TRUTH...
The word for 'sanctification' or 'sanctified' is translated as "set apart" in other translations and verses.
It means that the ongoing process of Sanctification must be in effect, and faith in the Truth (Jesus) must be in effect to be saved. It must be in effect always till we die.
So, if eternal security is not biblical, then it should be easy to prove that my logic in post #803 is flawed by proving that either:
1. eternal life is NOT a gift of God, or
2. God's gifts are NOT irrevocable.
This is very simple to understand.
The logic of eternal security is indeed very simple to understand. And impossible to refute.
And, BTW, you've been scolding me for having used the word "assume" in a post.
"Scolded"?? Really? Just pointing out what you have admitted. How is that scolding?
I'm posting here what the word "Assume" means, just for clarification:
Definitions for assume:
take for granted(verb)
take to be the case or to be true
accept without verification or proof
Wondering
Well, there it is. To "take for granted" and "accept without verification/proof is exactly the problem with your view. There is no proof. No evidence. Zero. Zilch.
I've given very simple yet solid logic to prove that the Bible teaches eternal security.
If post #803 can be refuted, please be my guest.
ps: I don't want to be wrong any more than you or anyone else on this thread does.
If my logic can be shown to be illogical, I'll admit it.