Cornelius said:
So the Bible self-authenticates. It cannot be disproven, it can only be ignored, and that does not make it go away. Its a reality.
Absurd. Why?
Premise: Minnesota claims all his words are God's words.
Conclusion: Therefore, minnesota's words are God's words.
How do we know minnesota's words are God's words? That's because minnesota says all his words are God's words. Thus, by applying self-authentication, I have proven all my words are God's words. This cannot be disproved. It can only be ignored, and that does not make it go away. It does not make it untrue. It's a reality.
Or, if you prefer the math route.
Premise: Minnesota claims one plus one equals two.
Premise: Minnesota claims two plus two equals four.
Premise: Minnesota claims four plus four equals eight.
Conclusion: Therefore, minnesota has established a mathematical pattern with his words.
Premise: Minnesota has established a mathematical pattern with his words.
Premise: When a mathematical pattern exists within someone's words, they are the words of God.
Conclusion: Therefore, minnesota's words are God's words.
How do we know minnesota's words are God's words? Because there is a mathematical pattern within his words. It's not numerology. It's not the Bible code. It's not even the minnesota code. It's a mathematical pattern. Thus, by applying the argument from mathematical patterns, I have proven all my words are God's words. This cannot be disproved. It can only be ignored, and that does not make it go away. It does not make it untrue. It's a reality.
Thus, it's clear from both forms of "logical" argument presented that I speak the very words of God.