Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is Sinning on Purpose Willful Sin ?

Acts 16:31 and the aorist tense. And believing is not a work. .

Actually Jethro, I agree with gr8grace3 on this one. The word "works", according to Paul in his "faith vs works" sections, means "works of the Jewish law" (specifically circumcision), and does not include faith in Christ. It also does not include prayer, charitable works, baptism, or any other act of obedience to the Gospel. The verse from John (6:29) that you posted, does not contradict this interpretation because John is talking about the "work" of God, not the "works of the law".

BTW, I do agree with you that believing is something a person has to consciously do, which makes it a "work", IF you believe that Paul means "everything done" by the word "works".
 
Last edited:
""This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent."" (John 6:29 NASB)

The point being, 'believing' really is something you DO. But I know, I know. Jesus didn't really mean believing is a work, right?

I believe Jesus was talking "tongue-in-cheek" here. The Jews were very works oriented. In fact, that is the basis of their question to Him:
Jn 8:28 - Therefore they said to Him, “What shall we do, so that we may work the works of God?” NASB

Judaism believed that one must work to be saved; ie, keeping the Law. Jesus' answer is in response to how they worded their question.

If Jesus was being literal here, then Paul directly contradicted Jesus in both Rom 4:4,5 - 4Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. 5But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness NASB and Eph 2:8,9 - 8For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;9not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. NASB.

Therefore, Jesus was NOT speaking literally when He used the word "work" in v.29.


It is non-meritorious in that it is not successfully completed works of the law by which you are then deservedly given a declaration of righteousness. But 'believing' most certainly is something you do, but a work for which you do not then deserve a declaration of righteousness for, but instead are given it freely as a gracious, unmerited gift.
To be clear, there are a lot of things we do that are not work. The Bible teaches "works" in the sense of creating a debt owed. Such as your paycheck. Is it a gift to you, or do you (or are supposed to) work for the money? Of course you are expected to work for the money paid to you.

Can you provide any example from life where one is paid merely for what he thinks?

Show me where I can not count on my believing as the vehicle through which I lay hold of the free gift of Christ's righteousness. Show me in the Bible where it's wrong to do that.
The better question is where in the Bible are we told to trust in your faith in Christ, which is what your view indicates.

Or, where does the Bible plainly say that one must continue to believe in order to be saved?

You've never provided any verse for either question.

Again, my conviction is based on 5 Biblical principles that you have not addressed yet.

1. Jesus promised the Holy Spirit would be with each believer forever. Jn 14:16
2. Paul said the indwelling Holy Spirit is a pledge or guarantee for the day of redemption.
3. Paul said that even if we (believers) are unfaithful (lack faith), God remains faithful. 2 Tim 2:13
4. God cannot deny Himself. 2 Tim 2:13
5. The Holy Spirit indwells everyone who has believed and seals them for the day of redemption.

If one follows each point here, there is no other conclusion than when one believes they are guaranteed salvation on the day of redemption.
 
I believe Jesus was talking "tongue-in-cheek" here. The Jews were very works oriented. In fact, that is the basis of their question to Him:
Jn 8:28 - Therefore they said to Him, “What shall we do, so that we may work the works of God?” NASB

Judaism believed that one must work to be saved; ie, keeping the Law. Jesus' answer is in response to how they worded their question.

If Jesus was being literal here, then Paul directly contradicted Jesus in both Rom 4:4,5 - 4Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. 5But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness NASB and Eph 2:8,9 - 8For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;9not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. NASB.

Therefore, Jesus was NOT speaking literally when He used the word "work" in v.29.



To be clear, there are a lot of things we do that are not work. The Bible teaches "works" in the sense of creating a debt owed. Such as your paycheck. Is it a gift to you, or do you (or are supposed to) work for the money? Of course you are expected to work for the money paid to you.

Can you provide any example from life where one is paid merely for what he thinks?


The better question is where in the Bible are we told to trust in your faith in Christ, which is what your view indicates.

Or, where does the Bible plainly say that one must continue to believe in order to be saved?

You've never provided any verse for either question.

Again, my conviction is based on 5 Biblical principles that you have not addressed yet.

1. Jesus promised the Holy Spirit would be with each believer forever. Jn 14:16
2. Paul said the indwelling Holy Spirit is a pledge or guarantee for the day of redemption.
3. Paul said that even if we (believers) are unfaithful (lack faith), God remains faithful. 2 Tim 2:13
4. God cannot deny Himself. 2 Tim 2:13
5. The Holy Spirit indwells everyone who has believed and seals them for the day of redemption.

If one follows each point here, there is no other conclusion than when one believes they are guaranteed salvation on the day of redemption.

Can a person be born again without making Jesus their Lord? If he is your Lord you would not live in habitual sin. I brought up gay marriage earlier. The couple living in sin like that is not saved because they have not made Jesus their Lord. (habitual sin is living in a lifestyle of sin) If they did, they would realize they are living in sin and ask for God to deliver them from it. Now I agree once that person realizes they are living in sin, and confesses and ask for Gods help to deliver them from it they will be saved.

I'm afraid you want Him as your savior, but not your Lord. I think they go together.
 

Therefore, Jesus was NOT speaking literally when He used the word "work" in v.29.
On the contrary, He was being quite literal. He contradicted their concept of them having to work with the concept that salvation is "the work of God ... "

God enables our belief. We have no hope of believing in Christ without the overriding influence of the Holy Spirit. Truly, "There is none righteous not even one,"
as Paul writes in Romans 3:10, quoting (or perhaps paraphrasing) Psalm 14:1-3. But through God's divine intervention, we can believe, though I do believe that we have some small part in either accepting or rejecting His invitation ...

... may the Calvinists withhold their wrath.
 
Show me where I can not count on my believing as the vehicle through which I lay hold of the free gift of Christ's righteousness. Show me in the Bible where it's wrong to do that..

You lay hold of the free gift of salvation by believing In the Lord Jesus Christ. Your believing did not save you,Christ saved you. The instant you believed, Christ saved you.Acts 16:31 points it out. Would you care to give us your interpretation of Acts 16:31?

We have a very plain and clear scripture to show us the Character of Christ if we stop believing.

New American Standard Bible
If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself.



Oh, yes some have. Danus may be the most detailed in that belief. The thinking is, if I have to keep believing, as if it's a work that I must continue to do, then I have robbed salvation of it's totally free attribute, which then means it's a work, and everyone knows salvation is not by works. That's how the distorted argument goes.

I have yet to see that one! Going to hell for continued belief?!?! It is about as ridiculous as the idea that my own belief saves me and not Christ. Grace saves us through our one shot freewill decision. My freewill decision is not the basis of my salvation. It is the way to get to the object(Christ) that actually does the saving.
 
YWe have a very plain and clear scripture to show us the Character of Christ if we stop believing.

New American Standard Bible
If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself.
Uh ... no. That verse does not teach anything even close to "lost salvation."

Eternal security is a biblical truth, unshakable and without equivocation. The verse you have cited here is instead regarding Christ's faithfulness to us in us where He abides, even when we fear and doubt.

The Savior's love and power are more than sufficient for every demand made upon Him, even in despair and terror. Helplessness and total distrust in either ourselves or Him are nonetheless overcome in the throes of grace. If the need is great, the Resource is infinite, for we have a great God and Savior to count on.

When Peter was sinking in the tumultuous waves, having taken his eyes off Christ, he did not secure his safety by "holding on." Jesus secured him, because He "stretched out His hand and caught him."
 
Uh ... no. That verse does not teach anything even close to "lost salvation."

Eternal security is a biblical truth, unshakable and without equivocation. The verse you have cited here is instead regarding Christ's faithfulness to us in us where He abides, even when we fear and doubt.

The Savior's love and power are more than sufficient for every demand made upon Him, even in despair and terror. Helplessness and total distrust in either ourselves or Him are nonetheless overcome in the throes of grace. If the need is great, the Resource is infinite, for we have a great God and Savior to count on.

When Peter was sinking in the tumultuous waves, having taken his eyes off Christ, he did not secure his safety by "holding on." Jesus secured him, because He "stretched out His hand and caught him."

Welcome. And just a heads up, maybe you are being a little to quick at responding to a few posts.

I am in the long haul(maybe 2 years now) of defending eternal security to this other member.

And Freegrace basically said the same thing you did in His post, Just used different wording.(the first line of your post)
 
Last edited:

Can a person be born again without making Jesus their Lord?
Yes.
If he is your Lord you would not live in habitual sin.
Incorrect. Submitting to the Lordship of Jesus Christ is an issue of spiritual growth, not salvation. The Christian life is a process of submitting to God in increasing measure.

2 Peter 1, NASB
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
4 to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you,
5 who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
6 In this you greatly rejoice, even though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been distressed by various trials,
7 so that the proof of your faith, being more precious than gold which is perishable, even though tested by fire, may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
8 and though you have not seen Him, you love Him, and though you do not see Him now, but believe in Him, you greatly rejoice with joy inexpressible and full of glory,
9 obtaining as the outcome of your faith the salvation of your souls.
Notice that Peter writes in the first three verses only of the salvation that faith has brought into our lives. Then he speaks of trials and difficulties that distress the believe -- these are the growing pains of sanctification. He returns, in the ninth verse, to state that salvation is based on faith alone. It does not depend on the ongoing trials of Christian maturity. Often alcoholics, adulterers, liars, gossips, and other "stronghold sins" of that nature will continue to display themselves in the life of a Christian who desperately wants to be rid of the sin, but hasn't managed to overcome the compulsion to sin with the love of Christ that is very present in their minds but, in the case of that habitual sin, has yet to wend its way into the heart sufficiently and strongly enough to expel the sin from day-to-day living.
I brought up gay marriage earlier. The couple living in sin like that is not saved ...
Sorry, but that isn't your call, regardless of what reasoning you offer. Only Christ knows the heart. You can make a supposition, but not a final judgment.

I deal with addicts in my line of work. I deal with adulterers in marriage and family practice. I've worked with them one on one, and there is no question they desire to be free from their sin. They don't know how. They know their lives have changed with Christ in them. Surrendering that compulsion over the love of Christ, though, is at this moment beyond their level of sanctification.

It is important for all Christians to realize that. Otherwise we make terribly wrong judgments we have no business making.
 
Yes.Incorrect. Submitting to the Lordship of Jesus Christ is an issue of spiritual growth, not salvation. The Christian life is a process of submitting to God in increasing measure.
2 Peter 1, NASB
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
4 to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you,
5 who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
6 In this you greatly rejoice, even though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been distressed by various trials,
7 so that the proof of your faith, being more precious than gold which is perishable, even though tested by fire, may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
8 and though you have not seen Him, you love Him, and though you do not see Him now, but believe in Him, you greatly rejoice with joy inexpressible and full of glory,
9 obtaining as the outcome of your faith the salvation of your souls.
Notice that Peter writes in the first three verses only of the salvation that faith has brought into our lives. Then he speaks of trials and difficulties that distress the believe -- these are the growing pains of sanctification. He returns, in the ninth verse, to state that salvation is based on faith alone. It does not depend on the ongoing trials of Christian maturity. Often alcoholics, adulterers, liars, gossips, and other "stronghold sins" of that nature will continue to display themselves in the life of a Christian who desperately wants to be rid of the sin, but hasn't managed to overcome the compulsion to sin with the love of Christ that is very present in their minds but, in the case of that habitual sin, has yet to wend its way into the heart sufficiently and strongly enough to expel the sin from day-to-day living.Sorry, but that isn't your call, regardless of what reasoning you offer. Only Christ knows the heart. You can make a supposition, but not a final judgment.

I deal with addicts in my line of work. I deal with adulterers in marriage and family practice. I've worked with them one on one, and there is no question they desire to be free from their sin. They don't know how. They know their lives have changed with Christ in them. Surrendering that compulsion over the love of Christ, though, is at this moment beyond their level of sanctification..
Great post and explanation.

It is important for all Christians to realize that. Otherwise we make terribly wrong judgments we have no business making.

And we endanger our own experiential sanctification/walk by judging the salvation/standing of another. We are never called to be fruit inspectors, we are called to be fruit producers through Christ.
 
Last edited:
You lay hold of the free gift of salvation by believing In the Lord Jesus Christ.

Is "laying hold" a work?

Your believing did not save you,Christ saved you. The instant you believed, Christ saved you.Acts 16:31 points it out. Would you care to give us your interpretation of Acts 16:31?

Is belief NECESSARY in order to be saved? If a person doesn't make the act of the will called "belief" or "having faith", is that person still saved?

I have yet to see that one! Going to hell for continued belief?!?! It is about as ridiculous as the idea that my own belief saves me and not Christ. Grace saves us through our one shot freewill decision. My freewill decision is not the basis of my salvation. It is the way to get to the object(Christ) that actually does the saving.

Ahhh...then that "decision", that act of the will, is how Grace is applied to us? Hummm...Sounds like a "work" to me.
 
Is belief NECESSARY in order to be saved? If a person doesn't make the act of the will called "belief" or "having faith", is that person still saved?

In my opinion, that person may never have been saved if he never committed to those acts first.

Romans 10:9 ESV
"Because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved."

Ephesians 2:8-9 ESV
"For by grace you have been saved through Faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."

As I have also heard, it is much more than just believing in Jesus and the Word. There is your relationship with Him which of all matters the most.

1 John 1:9 ESV
"If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
 
Your believing did not save you,Christ saved you.
"Your faith has saved you; go in peace." (Luke 7:50 NASB)


The instant you believed, Christ saved you.Acts 16:31 points it out. Would you care to give us your interpretation of Acts 16:31?
What's to debate?

"Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved" (Acts 16:31 NASB)

When one believes they are saved. This is not in contention. I think it's hard for you to grasp that we're saying that because you instantly hear 'forever and irreversible' when you hear the word 'saved' and have no capacity to see that being saved now, the moment you believe, does not have to mean forever and irreversibly. Your salvation is conditioned on believing, start to finish.


We have a very plain and clear scripture to show us the Character of Christ if we stop believing.

New American Standard Bible
If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself.
This is not the faithlessness of no longer trusting in the blood of Christ. How do we know that? Because immediately before that he talks about no longer trusting in the blood of Christ:

"If we deny Him, He also will deny us" (2 Timothy 2:12 NASB)

So, pay attention carefully to what I'm saying: It's impossible that the 'being faithless' in vs. 13 can be the 'denying him' he just spoke about in vs. 12.

When we deny him, he denies us (vs.12). When we are faithless, he cannot deny us. So you can see it's IMPOSSIBLE that 'denying him' and 'being faithless' are the same thing--the outcome of the one is different than the other. Understand? So we need to repent immediately of saying that 'being faithless' is the same as 'denying him'. Immediately.


I have yet to see that one! Going to hell for continued belief?!?!
Yes, that's what they say. If you have to continue to believe to be saved then they say that makes salvation by your own work, not Christ's.


It is about as ridiculous as the idea that my own belief saves me and not Christ.
"Your faith has saved you; go in peace." (Luke 7:50 NASB)


Grace saves us through our one shot freewill decision.
As long as that one shot freewill decision that saves continues, we are in agreement about this.

My freewill decision is not the basis of my salvation. It is the way to get to the object(Christ) that actually does the saving.
Are you afraid that my freewill decision is somehow the works that Paul said can not justify? Paul said believing is in fact the very thing that justifies. If I'm mistaken about what he said, show me in his teaching that he does not say this but says something else.
 
Last edited:
Actually Jethro, I agree with gr8grace3 on this one. The word "works", according to Paul in his "faith vs works" sections, means "works of the Jewish law" (specifically circumcision), and does not include faith in Christ.
That's the very point I was making.

As you know, believing is not among the works Paul says can not justify. He says it is the very 'work'--something we do--that does indeed justify. Many Protestants dismiss the continuing 'work' of believing to be saved on the basis that it makes salvation by works, as if Paul included believing in with the works of the law that can not justify.
 
I deal with addicts in my line of work. I deal with adulterers in marriage and family practice. I've worked with them one on one, and there is no question they desire to be free from their sin. They don't know how. They know their lives have changed with Christ in them. Surrendering that compulsion over the love of Christ, though, is at this moment beyond their level of sanctification.

It is important for all Christians to realize that. Otherwise we make terribly wrong judgments we have no business making.
That was the very point I am trying to make. The realize they need to change. It may take time, it may take the rest of their life, so long as they are relying on God to deliver them. What if they didn't want to change their life? What if they enjoy their sin?
 
If Jesus was being literal here, then Paul directly contradicted Jesus in both Rom 4:4,5 - 4Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. 5But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness NASB and Eph 2:8,9 - 8For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;9not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. NASB.

Therefore, Jesus was NOT speaking literally when He used the word "work" in v.29.
The mistake you are making is not remembering that Paul is speaking of 'work' in the context of doing the works of the law with the intention of being declared (made) righteous by doing them. How can Paul say we are made righteous by having faith in Christ if 'doing' that is nothing more than the work he just condemned as not being able to justify?


The better question is where in the Bible are we told to trust in your faith in Christ, which is what your view indicates.
We are plainly taught in the Bible to have faith to be saved. Not only do we trust that the blood of Christ is how our unrighteousness is removed, but also trust God's word that having faith in that blood is how it is secured. .

Or, where does the Bible plainly say that one must continue to believe in order to be saved?
"...you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you" (1 Corinthians 15:2 NASB)

There are several creative ways that OSAS makes these plain words go away and not mean what they plainly say. I forgot how you make them go away. Perhaps you redefine 'saved'? I don't remember.


You've never provided any verse for either question.
Lol, they have been posted repeatedly. I am amazed that you have the audacity to say they have never been posted. I'm guessing that is your way of saying that the passages we post don't mean what they so plainly say, not that we didn't provide any evidence, even remotely, to show that salvation is dependent on continuing to believe to the very end.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can a person be born again without making Jesus their Lord?
This question comes from the "Lordship Salvation camp". A person is born again when they believe in Jesus Christ for eternal life. Making Christ Lord is a command to those who have already believed, per 1 Pet 3:15. Making Christ Lord requires obedience, and effort. That does not save.

If he is your Lord you would not live in habitual sin.
Not if the believer is grieving and quenching the Holy Spirit.

I brought up gay marriage earlier. The couple living in sin like that is not saved because they have not made Jesus their Lord.
Maybe you don't realize it, but your view is that one is saved by their lifestyle. That isn't found in Scripture.

(habitual sin is living in a lifestyle of sin) If they did, they would realize they are living in sin and ask for God to deliver them from it. Now I agree once that person realizes they are living in sin, and confesses and ask for Gods help to deliver them from it they will be saved.
So, one is saved by lifestyle, and by confession of sin, huh? Still not biblical.

I'm afraid you want Him as your savior, but not your Lord. I think they go together.
Your fear is misplaced completely. He IS my Savior and my Lord, but when ANY believer sins, they are on the throne, not Jesus. Which is why Peter wrote 1 Pet 3:15, which is to believers, those already saved.
 
On the contrary, He was being quite literal. He contradicted their concept of them having to work with the concept that salvation is "the work of God "

Yes, salvation is the work of God. But that's not what they were asking. They wanted to know what THEY had to do.

God enables our belief. We have no hope of believing in Christ without the overriding influence of the Holy Spirit. Truly, "There is none righteous not even one,"
as Paul writes in Romans 3:10, quoting (or perhaps paraphrasing) Psalm 14:1-3. But through God's divine intervention, we can believe, though I do believe that we have some small part in either accepting or rejecting His invitation ...

... may the Calvinists withhold their wrath.
What does it matter whether Calvinists withhold wrath or not? Doesn't matter. And the issue of belief is ours alone. When one is presented with God's obvious creation, they are without excuse for not glorifying Him and giving thanks (Rom 1:19-21). Those who recognize Him as Creator have no excuse for not seeking Him, since mankind was created to seek Him, per Acts 17:26-27. Those who have the gospel presented to them have no excuse for not accepting the free gift of eternal life through believing what God promises, per John 6:40.

God created mankind with an intellect with which to understand His promises. And God gave mankind a conscience by which to know right from wrong, per Rom 2:14,15.
 
gr8grace3 said this:
Your believing did not save you,Christ saved you.
"Your faith has saved you; go in peace." (Luke 7:50 NASB)
I suggest considering context. The sinful woman was not saved BY her faith, but BY WHOM her faith was in.

"Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved" (Acts 16:31 NASB)
When one believes they are saved. This is not in contention. I think it's hard for you to grasp that we're saying that because you instantly hear 'forever and irreversible' when you hear the word 'saved' and have no capacity to see that being saved now, the moment you believe, does not have to mean forever and irreversibly. Your salvation is conditioned on believing, start to finish.
I'm still waiting for any verse that supports your opinion that salvation is conditioned on continual faith. Of course it is conditioned on believing. But you have no verse at all that supports the opinion that if faith fails, salvation is lost.

Plus, I've provided 5 biblical principles that demand that one is eternally secure the MOMENT they believe. And no one has yet even attempted to refute these principles, or show me how they don't demand eternal security.
 
The mistake you are making is not remembering that Paul is speaking of 'work' in the context of doing the works of the law with the intention of being declared (made) righteous by doing them. How can Paul say we are made righteous by having faith in Christ if 'doing' that is nothing more than the work he just condemned as not being able to justify?

It really doesn't matter how Paul used the word. In fact, we KNOW how he meant it by the phrase "Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due". This isn't about keeping the Law, since even in the OT, no one was saved by keeping the Law. So your view about what Paul meant by "works" is incorrect.

Paul was speaking about the fact that salvation cannot be earned by effort. In the general sense, man goes to work, and by his effort, earns his paycheck. He creates a debt owed by the one he works for. Salvation is by grace, NOT by work, or effort.

We are plainly taught in the Bible to have faith to be saved. Not only do we trust that the blood of Christ is how our unrighteousness is removed, but also trust God's word that having faith in that blood is how it is secured. .
No one is arguing against this.

"...you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you" (1 Corinthians 15:2 NASB)

There are several creative ways that OSAS makes these plain words go away and not mean what they plainly say. I forgot how you make them go away. Perhaps you redefine 'saved'? I don't remember.

There are no creative ways to understand these clear words. The Greek word for "hold fast" means to 'possess'. Very simple. Those who have believed possess the gospel. This isn't about ongoing faith, as you assume.

And I've provided 5 biblical principles that demand eternal security.
 
"...you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you" (1 Corinthians 15:2 NASB)
There are several creative ways that OSAS makes these plain words go away and not mean what they plainly say.
One “creative way” anti-OSAS so often “makes the plan words go away” (in their minds) is the frequent and highly specific use of ellipses (...) or even the omission of them when necessary to complete a verse/sentence. You didn't quote the entire verse 2 nor the entire sentence of Paul's (verse1-2)

Let's look into what's in theses particular ellipses of yours here (and there one on the front end and the trailing end of Paul’s point:

1. From your first … what do we find? (Now I make known to you, …
Paul’s switching subjects (moving on from the gifts and orderly worship topic of Chapter 14) to a ‘new’ topic (a now topic) within his letter to them. I say ‘new’ in scare quotes because his new topic is that he’s reminding the church of the Gospel that he preached to them earlier. (not that the topic switch means OSAS = yes or no). But the other portion of the first ellipses is important. Very important. Paul’s speaking to saved “Brethren” unless they are not saved in the first place. And some there were NOT saved in the first place.

2. From your second … (which you failed to even include the ellipses as if you were quoting a complete ending to verse 2) what do we find? (brethren, UNLESS YOU BLIEVED IN VAIN.
Paul knows full well that there are people in this church that had “believed in vain”. How do we know this? Read on:

Verses 3-11 is said by scholars to be one of the earliest Christian Creeds. The “first importance” Creed that Paul himself received from others. It is one of the very definitions of what it takes to become a Christian. Unless you believe this Creed, you ain’t a saved Christian! And some there didn't believe it.

How do we know that there were people there that were never saved in the first place? See V34…for some have no knowledge of God. I speak this to your shame and Paul even tells us so in another … verse that you omit from this passage’s proper understanding:

12 Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?

Good question. Answer is they “believed in vain” and had a worthless faith. Obviously and were therefore never holding fast to his Creed in the first place. You don't understand Paul's logical flow of his sentence (verse 1-2) or either you do and just don't care about it.

You cannot believe in the resurrection of Christ, if you don’t believe in any resurrection of the dead, was his point! if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless;

What else is obvious from the …’s in/around your partial verse quotation (that you so plainly quote so often)? The very definition of what it takes to have a non-vain belief, in the first place:

10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me did not prove vain. ...
so also in Christ all will be made alive.

Paul’s telling them that just as sure as “all will be made alive”, God given grace will not prove vain. Why? Because it leads to God given faith, to include belief in the death/resurrection of the Lord (Rom 10:9), that leads to their salvation. UNLESS that didn’t have this grace, this faith, this salvation in the first place that is. (see how God saved Saul for an example of how this works)

Plus, these are just some of the points that have been presented to you concerning your error on what this passage teaches in it’s ellipses in the past, which you continue to ignore : (http://christianforums.net/Fellowsh...reason-you-cant-lose-your-salvation-is.54780/)

1. “they would not have had salvation without acknowledging Christ's Resurrection (Rom 10:9)”
2. “If the Corinthian Christians had believed from the beginning that there was no Resurrection [as some of the non-Christians there did not believe in any ressurection, Paul says so in verse 12], then they were not saved in the first place - because salvation depends upon Christ's Resurrection.”
3. “3 For I passed on to you as of first importance[a] what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, 4 and that he was buried, and that he was raised up on the third day according to the scriptures [Obviously if they didn’t believe in any resurrection, then they didn’t believe one of Paul’s “first importance” salvation Creedal points.]
4. “Where does the text say that every person in the Corinth church was saved? It doesn’t. Anywhere. Anti-OSAS assumes the entire Corithin church was saved to begin with even after OSAS points out “But if Christ has not been raised, your faith is empty; you are still in your sins and your faith is in vain.
5. “1 Cor 15 does not tell us how to become un-saved. It tells unsaved people how to become saved. “unless you believed in vain” does not say ‘unless you once believed and were saved and then later develop a vain belief, you become de-saved’. But that’s how the poster interprets this passage.”
6. “Some in Corinth said there was no resurrection from the dead (1Cor 15:12). If there is no resurrection, then they “believed in vain”. Those who denied a resurrection did not "hold fast the word which" Paul "preached." They believed only part of the Gospel, and ignored the rest.”
Sorry for the length of this post. But there’s so much evidence against your view of 1 Cor 15, that it’s hard to keep it short.
 
Back
Top