Disciple88 said:
Novum said:
Common sense is surprisingly uncommon. And the bible is only one source of morality.
One source? How about THE source of all morality. Divine Truth. God-Breathed. Eternal Wisdom.
Eternal: Isiah 40:8
God-Breathed: 2Timothy 3:16-17
Many bible believers - christians and jews alike - would point to the ten commandments as a positive example of biblical morality. The problem is that it is very, very easy to think of situations in which defying the ten commandments would be the most ethical choice to make.
Let's take an easy one - the sixth commandment. Thou shalt not kill.
Suppose you had a time machine and were able to travel back in time to the year 1900. Would you kill Adolf Hitler as a child, if it would mean that millions of lives would be saved?
Most all rational people would. In fact, some might even argue that to
not kill Hitler would be grossly unethical and unjust. It seems, then, that we have found at least one possible situation in which following the ten commandments would be unethical.
Some have responded that the sixth commandment is actually translated better as "Thou shalt not
murder" instead of "Thou shalt not
kill". But what is murder? By definition, murder is an unjustified killing. That's rather self explanatory, isn't it? How, if the commandment is translated in this way, is it at all helpful to us? Didn't we already know that, by definition, it's a bad idea to do something unjust?
Killing aside, there are other practices in the bible that demonstrate its failure as a source of morality. For example, there is much in the bible about the treatment of slaves. The bible does not specifically condone or condemn the practice of slavery and it is therefore thoroughly useless were we, as a society, attempting to determine the morality of slavery.
The bible cannot be rationally used, by itself, as the sole standard of morality for a person, society, or world when exceptions like these are present.