T
Tristan
Guest
Yes, let's be rational and use logic and address just a couple of your responses. Looking at your response to point 5, firstly, there is no context. The Bible has context as it tells a continuous story, the Qur'an does not as it is a collection of sayings. Secondly, it is a contradiction. Your analogy doesn't work since God making "a mountain so big he can't lift it," is an error in logic. God having children, however, presents no such logical error.
As to your point 6, how do you know those aren't literal claims? Prove that those statements aren't to be taken literally.
I'm not a Muslim, so I certainly won't be able to answer all your questions, nor to I even agree with everything they believe. What I've done is take a handful of those objections and show you how shallow they are. That kind of questioning is what gets me annoyed when directed at Christians, so I wouldn't want others to experience it. I'd rather that discussion and debate be much more profound that that.
I think that both religious texts are written in a different literary style in a different culture. You'll notice more similarities between the Old Testament and the Quran than the New Testament and the Quran because one testament is written with an eastern cultural perspective and the other with a western one.
The only reason God having children makes sense to us, is because our scriptures are completely based on. Think for a moment from their perspective. Is God anthropological? No. He doesn't even physically exist in our universe. They see a nonphysical God and find it absurd that he would have a child. It's a logical error to them. They may not be right, but I don't view that as a contradiction. It looks to me more like a misunderstanding of who God is. Perhaps I'm a little more forgiving about this than you are.
As for #6...I don't know, but rather than looking for contradictions, I look for how it meshes. I absolutely hate when people do this to my Bible. Don't take a historical book and look for how it's inconsistent, rather we should look to see how it IS consistent. We never take other pieces of literature and tear them apart, yet religious texts are the first to be criticized. If in context there's a contradiction, then sure, we should recognize that, but most of the ones listed above are outright wrong, and even someone who is not a Muslim can see that.