brightfame52
Member
- Dec 3, 2020
- 5,081
- 889
- Thread starter
- #21
No I dont see a breakdown ! I see consistency of Headship results !You don't see a breakdown? If all men only means all without distinction then it means that in both cases. That means all men without distinction die, but not all men without exception die. However, we know that all men without exception die. Therefore, justification of life came to all men without exception. It has to mean the same in both cases or the analogy breaks down. So, that means that either, all men die and justification of life comes to all men, without exception or without distinction. I say all men die without exception and justification comes to all men without exception. However, just because justification of life comes to all men, it doesn't mean all men are justified because not all men receive Christ. On the other hand, you say all men without distinction die, and receive justification of life. And, because your theology doesn't allow for man to reject Christ you are forced by theology to break down that analogy.
You have to say that all men without exception die, but that justification of life came to all men without distinction. That your theology causes you to break down the analogy shows that there is something wrong in your argument.