In the early chapters of Acts, Peter is pretty much Top Dog.
Later, this seems to fade.
Paul rebukes Peter at Antioch, for when "certain of James" arrived, Peter drew back from eating with Gentiles. James seems to be at least the Emcee, if not "in charge" at the Acts 15 council.
At one point, Paul seemed to say "I am apostle to the uncircumcised, as Peter is to the circumcision"
James, as best I can figure, is a half-brother to Jesus by an earlier marriage of Joseph (I think this of Jude and the other brothers and sisters of Jesus), and James was not originally a disciple, how he got to be one of the PILLARS is beyond me.
The other James, brother of John of Zebedee, was one of the early martyrs.
Peter, we know was in both Jerusalem and Antioch - was he also later in Rome (
Peter addressed the acts 15 counsel with the truth.
After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them,
for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”
James left a few rules, approved by the Holy Spirit, taking out all the other baggage as a requirement to salvation. (lets not make it difficult for the gentiles turning to God)
James hinted they could learn these later (For the law of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath.”)
The problem with James statement is the synagogues were run by those who rejected Gods purpose for them (salvation by the forgiveness of sins found in Christ Jesus) Those that proclaimed faith in Jesus would not be welcomed there.
Clearly Judaism and more so Rabbinic Judaism has been cast adrift and is rudderless. They do not know God and they rule by their own authority. They claim a uniqueness that no longer exists
as they believe in this age. "The Jewish people"
Those God calls his children as in the children of God.
children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.
Most, if not any, can answer ,all he questions, Paul asked with a yes. But even if one could apart from Jesus they are cast adrift and rudderless.
Are they Hebrews? So am I. Are they Israelite's? So am I. Are they Abraham's descendants? So am I.
James nor Peter admitted to authorizing the gentiles need to be circumcised and obey the law of Moses for salvation.
We have heard that some went out from us without our authorization and disturbed you, troubling your minds by what they said
Personally I believe Jesus had "younger" brothers and sisters. The scripture only states Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus. It would have been lawful for Mary to have relations with her husband afterward and have other children.