Actually, there are URL that explain your position. Few in a positive light.
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/what-happens-to-those-who-never-hear-gospel/
Speaks about "What Happens to Those Who Never Hear the Gospel?"
Says you are part of what is called 'inclusivsim" which is is based on a belief in the efficacy of general revelation for a salvific relationship to God”.
Inclusivists (you) sometimes employ
Romans 1:18–23 to highlight the importance of general revelation, on closer reading the text actually supports the exclusivist view. Paul’s argument is that God’s revelation in nature
is sufficient only to condemn, not to save.
John 3:36 he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
Explain this verse ... how one who does not believe in Christ (all those who died without hearing of Christ) will not see life (salvation); yet, you say they can.
For “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? . . . So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ. (
Rom. 10:13–15, 17)
The chain of logic in Paul’s mind is straightforward: (from same site as above)
- The only way to be saved is to call on Christ’s name.
- The only way to call on Christ’s name is to believe the gospel.
- The only way to believe the gospel is to hear the gospel.
- The only way to hear the gospel is to be told the gospel.
The reality of another means of salvation besides faith in “the word of Christ” is difficult to square with this passage.
Also no response (exogesis) of:
- John 3:18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.
- 1 John 5:12 He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.
I'll exegete your verses in regards to salvation to those who have not heard of Christ...
There is no mention of how one is saved in these verses. At best one could assume that if one seeks God there is a way to be saved. But Romans 3:10-17 tells us NO ONE SEEKS GOD so the assumption is void.
No where in Romans 1:20-25 does it say "Jesus tasted death for all of them". You can't find Jesus or Christ in the verses so your statement is false. (Aside: show me mention of Christ in these verses which you say state show "Jesus tasted death for all of them", please. Verses supposedly show Christ dying of everyone that don't mention Christ .... I don't see how you can propose such an interpretation.
Agreed. All those who have not heard of Christ refuse to believe. Again, NO ONE SEEKS GOD. It is impossible to be saved by belief in Christ without knowledge of Christ. The logic is simple enough.
Agreed. Nothing here about Christ "tasting death for everyone".
If Christ died for (tasted) death for everyone then either:
1) Everyone will be saved
2) There must be a condition attached to his death to be appropriated to secure salvation. If the condition cannot possibly be met, then "Christ tasting death for everyone without exception", if true, is a hollow, meaningless and efficaciously worthless to those who cannot possibly take advantage of the offer. I say the condition is faith in Christ, you seem to say there's another possible condition which is explained in Romans 1:20-25 but won't explain what those who have not heard of Christ must do to be saved. Those verses just say they are without excuse and explain why they are without excuse. No mention of what to do to be saved, none... and you can't/won't point out what they must do to be saved from those verses.