There is no Luke 25. Yes, parables are a part of our beliefs.Sorry, I assumed Christians would know about Luke 25-37 and Matthew 25:31-46. These are very basic parts of our beliefs.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
There is no Luke 25. Yes, parables are a part of our beliefs.Sorry, I assumed Christians would know about Luke 25-37 and Matthew 25:31-46. These are very basic parts of our beliefs.
There is Luke 10:25-37There is no Luke 25.
So you see that Jesus told His followers to emulate a heretic who loved others, instead of a Levite who did not.Yes, parables are a part of our beliefs.
I do not see anything about following the heretic.There is Luke 10:25-37
So you see that Jesus told His followers to emulate a heretic who loved others, instead of a Levite who did not.
Salvation is not a reward for belonging to the right club. It's whether or not you love God and your fellow man.
Matthew 22: 36 Master, which is the greatest commandment in the law? 37 Jesus said to him: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole mind. 38 This is the greatest and the first commandment. 39 And the second is like to this: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments dependeth the whole law and the prophets.
Luke 10:36 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?” 37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.” Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”I do not see anything about following the heretic.
The parable was about being a good neighbor, it was about not following heretics.Luke 10:36 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?” 37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.” Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
So you see that Jesus told His followers to emulate a heretic who loved others, instead of a Levite who did not.
Those who think His parable is just "it's good to help your neighbor", miss the entire point of His parable. He used a heretic (a Samaritan) who loved his neighbor, telling us to emulate that one, rather than a religiously-correct Levite who did not show love for his neighbor.The parable was about being a good neighbor, it was about not following heretics.
The best evidence I ever saw or heard of is rarely if ever seen in forums. Tradition is extremely difficult to be set free from.the biblical evidence leans heavily toward the pole being use.
Romans 2:13Those who think His parable is just "it's good to help your neighbor", miss the entire point of His parable. He used a heretic (a Samaritan) who loved his neighbor, telling us to emulate that one, rather than a religiously-correct Levite who did not show love for his neighbor.
"Who is my neighbor?" Jesus showed him that all people are our neighbors and that those who act out of love for others are His people.
This is why in Matthew, He says that what we do for others in need will determine whether we spend eternity with Him or with the devil and his followers. He says some of the saved won't even understand why He is saving them; these are those who followed the law by nature, as Paul tells us.
Romans 2:14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: 15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)
I'd pay attention, if I were you.
Now you're wising up.Romans 2:13
For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God’s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous.
Not sure why it's so important for you to revise the cruifixion. That's what Romans did with rebels. Always did.Thus, whether it be ‛ets´, xylon, or stauros, the meaning was the same, that of a "tree", "timber", "wood", "stick", or "upright pale or stake" and not a cross.
And what does the shape have to do with anything?The Cross as a Talisman
A talisman is an object that someone believes holds magical properties that brings good luck protecting the possessor from evil or harm.
A tree can hardly be called "an upright pale or stake," given that they have numerous main branches which then have branches, etc. They're more cross-like than stake-like, but that isn't the point anyway. A cross is made of wood or timber, which come from trees, so those all fit.Thus, whether it be ‛ets´, xylon, or stauros, the meaning was the same, that of a "tree", "timber", "wood", "stick", or "upright pale or stake" and not a cross.
There is no mention of crucifixion on a cross in the Old Testament. There is however the mention of a snake on a pole.Not sure why it's so important for you to revise the cruifixion. That's what Romans did with rebels. Always did.
A Tomb in Jerusalem Reveals the History of Crucifixion and Roman Crucifixion Methods
The tomb of Yehohanan contains first physical evidence of crucifixion in antiquity
Examination of Yehohanan’s bones showed one of the many Roman crucifixion methods. Both of his feet had been nailed together to the cross with a wooden plaque while his legs were bent to one side. His arm bones revealed scratches where the nails had passed between. Both legs were badly fractured, most likely from a crushing blow meant to end his suffering and bring about a faster death. Yehohanan was probably a political dissident against Roman oppression. In death his bones have helped fill in gaps in the history of crucifixion.
A Tomb in Jerusalem Reveals the History of Crucifixion and Roman Crucifixion Methods
The history of crucifixion was brought to life when the heel bones of a young man were found in a Jerusalem tomb, pierced by an iron nail.www.biblicalarchaeology.org
Not surprising. Hebrews didn't crucify people. Romans did.There is no mention of crucifixion on a cross in the Old Testament.
yes there was a pole with a serpent on it. and what happened to it ? and why ?There is no mention of crucifixion on a cross in the Old Testament. There is however the mention of a snake on a pole.
Numbers 21:8
The Lord said to Moses, “Make a snake and put it up on a pole; anyone who is bitten can look at it and live.”
Etymology of stauros
The word stauros comes from the verb ἵστημι (histēmi: "straighten up", "stand"), which in turn comes from the Proto-Indo-European root *steh2-u- "pole",<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stauros#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> related to the root *steh2- "to stand, to set"
Stauros is a upright stake.
Ezra 6:11Not surprising. Hebrews didn't crucify people. Romans did.
And as you see, we have physical proof that the Romans crucified people at that time and place.
It was removed because people were paying too much attention to it.yes there was a pole with a serpent on it. and what happened to it ? and why ?
The Romans hanged people by both ways. The Messiah to come was to be hanged on a pole.Not surprising. Hebrews didn't crucify people. Romans did.
And as you see, we have physical proof that the Romans crucified people at that time and place.