i dont think the pope is the anti Christolder commentaries will call the pope the antichrist,or as I say the auntiChrist .the aunt who got possessed ,lol
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
i dont think the pope is the anti Christolder commentaries will call the pope the antichrist,or as I say the auntiChrist .the aunt who got possessed ,lol
the UMC IS liberal the conference board .i was raised UMC there to control /programmed for my taste . i would almost dare wager that half the ministers are not called of Godthe umc itself says they did ,and also I used them to get what he said from his books,do keep in mind there weren't a bazillion Arminism churches in America then.
odd ,he wrote a commentary and its used by some here .
I read the article. No where does it say MacArthur is not a theologian. The article does not address the matter directly. It talks about him being a pastor. There is not reason one cannot be both. The definition of theologian: A theologian is someone who studies the nature of God, religion, and religious beliefs. No where in the article does it say MacArthur does not study the nature of God, or religion or religious beliefs.
Wikipedia lists MacArthur as a theologian: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_theologians
That being said, this is a trivial matter.
I,guess,jasonc,
Writing a commentary does not make one a theologian. Much of MacArthur's commentary material seems to be based on his expository preaching.
John MacArthur has written a one-volume, The MacArthur Bible Commentary. I used to have his entire NT commentary set on each book of the NT. It's a 33-volume set. I've given the set away because it was too expository in nature and didn't provide the exegetical studies I wanted.
Let me add: He's an outstanding expositor of Scripture. I wish there were more around me here in Brisbane but he was too Calvinistic for me. The best exegetical commentary set I have in my library is by the evangelical Lutheran, R C H Lenski, written in the 1940s. You have to be able to read Greek and know its grammar to gain the most benefit from Lenski. That won't be a normal cup of tea for most evangelicals. Lenski is my favourite NT commentary set. Otherwise, I choose individual books of the Bible by exegetes.
The New Testament Commentary Set, 12 Volumes by William Hendriksen and Simon Kistemaker contains excellent exegetical material and I have the set. However, I have to filter the material through my non-Calvinistic worldview. I do accept the T and P of TULIP.
Oz
Are the above persons reformed?i like Adam Clarke he is fairly historical they have comments just like we do . i also like Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown there are several that are good. you just have to be able to find the good and bad. as a preacher man once said its like eating chicken eat te meat throw the bones away
LOLi dont think the pope is the anti Christ
not that i know of if you listened to jay vernon mcgee he is calvinist but does not teach like oneAre the above persons reformed?
I,guess,
I'm not able to debate or challenge your level but the word theologian means one who studies the bible .
you just posted a verse about berean Jews,,jews unless you are a rabbi then who went to yeshiva did my study the books after the torah much like the,so how did those bereans.know where to look,they opened the tanakh and followed ,they studied the bible and noticed Paul was right.
my pastor can take the Hebrew I have sent to him from,my family ,respond on modern Hebrew and or translate it ,Greek he is equal to do ,I would hardly say he isn't a theologian .he does it any teaching.
in,short,there are mechanics ,and there are master mechanics ,a mechanic goes to,the master ones for hard to solve problems ,both fix cars.
that's my point
Theology literally means 'thinking about God'. In practice it usually means studying the sources of Christian belief like the Bible and the Creeds, and exploring the meaning of Christianity for today. In universities and colleges, a course in 'Theology' means a course in Christianity, while a course labelled 'Religious Studies' usually means a course on world religions. One classic definition of theology was given by St Anselm. He called it 'faith seeking understanding' and for many this is the true function of Christian theology (What is theology? Paul Badham)
Ha!not that i know of if you listened to jay vernon mcgee he is calvinist but does not teach like one
no mcgee is straight across hew will tell you that nobody fully understands election and predestination. some times you have go past the labels to get the meatHa!
Many do not.
But they feed the ideas of calvinism little at a time.
I think that the term theologian has come to mean one that studies God's word as his life'sJason,
Literally - based on the Greek - "theologian" = theos (God) + logos (word or message). So a theologian is one who studies and presents the message about God.
So, a theologian is one who engages in the study of theology.
Oz
OK!no mcgee is straight across hew will tell you that nobody fully understands election and predestination. some times you have go past the labels to get the meat
its a hair,splitting you,did .Jason,
Literally - based on the Greek - "theologian" = theos (God) + logos (word or message). So a theologian is one who studies and presents the message about God.
So, a theologian is one who engages in the study of theology.
Oz
i do also i will use a commentary to see what someone else has to say. i know how to discern truth from fictionI do believe, however, that God uses the bible to
Reveal Himself to us,,,,including his nature.
Christmasxma s
the Greek word x is chi.its not wrong to use Xmas .old ,very old pre 1900 stories use that .Christmas
I don't know why but I try not to read commentaries. I have many bibles, including some different Italian ones, and I use them. Very rarely will I use commentary.i do also i will use a commentary to see what someone else has to say. i know how to discern truth from fiction
and I have local leaders I go to for that reason .I don't know why but I try not to read commentaries. I have many bibles, including some different Italian ones, and I use them. Very rarely will I use commentary.
I"d rather use OzSpen's web page or ask someone I trust on this forum.