B
belovedwolfofgod
Guest
Karl Barth distinguished in Christianity between religion and faith. He was wrong if he was intending to make a complete seperation between them, seeing only faith as positive and religion as negative. Faith without religion is unreal; religion belongs to it, and Christian faith, of its very nature, must live as a religion.
--"Many Religions-One Covenant" by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI)
And to paraphrase the rest of what was written in the book, basically, until the unification of Christianity is effected, this non-denominational approach basically makes one a reed blown in the wind with no grounding except one's interpretation of the Bible. This is parallel to the New Age movement idea of "truth is relative." However, we must never get away from the idea that the truth can be known. However, interpreting a Bible doesnt really give you much. As many ealry christian writers write (like Ignatious of Antioch, Polycarp, Clement of Rome, the Didache, basically a large number of first century christian writers) that the person should stand in unity with their bishop as he is the pastoral leader. If the bishop is in need of correction, the other bishops will handle it. However, people, in interpreting the Bible on their own and following this interpretation, have gotten away from this. The unbroken Tradition that composed the Bible is that same Tradition that exists today and because of it we can still have faith in the Bible, but it requires faith in the promise of Jesus in the book of Matthew "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it[church]."
--"Many Religions-One Covenant" by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI)
And to paraphrase the rest of what was written in the book, basically, until the unification of Christianity is effected, this non-denominational approach basically makes one a reed blown in the wind with no grounding except one's interpretation of the Bible. This is parallel to the New Age movement idea of "truth is relative." However, we must never get away from the idea that the truth can be known. However, interpreting a Bible doesnt really give you much. As many ealry christian writers write (like Ignatious of Antioch, Polycarp, Clement of Rome, the Didache, basically a large number of first century christian writers) that the person should stand in unity with their bishop as he is the pastoral leader. If the bishop is in need of correction, the other bishops will handle it. However, people, in interpreting the Bible on their own and following this interpretation, have gotten away from this. The unbroken Tradition that composed the Bible is that same Tradition that exists today and because of it we can still have faith in the Bible, but it requires faith in the promise of Jesus in the book of Matthew "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it[church]."