For anyone reading this not knowing the difference;This notion above is classic infused righteousness where by man is to "BE" sinless by his actions, thoughts, and behavior from the moment of his redemption.
If said saved man, screws up after being saved even one bit, he must ask for forgiveness and start the process all over again. He'll have to be 100% sinless upon his death; just like Christ, in order to enter haven. Otherwise he's doomed to hell despite his best efforts.
Peter here was addressing Simon who was a Christian, who committed a sin by trying to purchase communication of the holy spirit to others with his money (Acts 8:18-19), so we see a Christian CAN fall away from grace, and Peter tells him how to get it back:
Acts 8:22 (KJV)
22 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee.
Unless he repents of his sin, prays for forgiveness, he is condemned (otherwise why would Peter say this?)
Jesus said:
Matthew 18:11 (KJV)
11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
Then he said in the very next verse:
Matthew 18:12 (KJV)
12 How think ye? if a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray, doth he not leave the ninety and nine, and goeth into the mountains, and seeketh that which is gone astray?
Note here Jesus says in this parable if he has a hundred Christians (they must be Christians as they are his Sheep) and one be lost (so it is possible for a Christian to be lost) that we are to try and turn the sheep back to the flock? does not the word "seek" mean there is a chance not to "find" and even if you find the lost sheep, does not the lost sheep have to follow the Shepard back to the flock?
Matthew 18:13 (KJV)
13 And if so be that he find it, verily I say unto you, he rejoiceth more of that
sheep, than of the ninety and nine which went not astray.
"And if so be that he find it" implies the possibility exist it not be found!
Yet puts another hole in the once saved always saved.
in this way Christ does not pay any debt on behalf of man, but man pays his own way to salvation.
So what we have here is a clearly salvation by WORKS of the individual and not by Christ, but what they will try to say is that Christ did the work on the cross, but only enough to allow people to ask for forgiveness and get a shot at being perfect like Christ.
The bible does not teach this at all, and those of you who understand the saving grace of God need not worry about this type of teaching.
That is EXACTLY what the bible teaches, I have given scripture above where Simon (Who WAS a Christian who Christ "Paid for his sins", has fallen from Grace, and is just as lost (unless he repent) as he was before he became a Christian.
Martin Luther worried up on this quite a bit in his day. He'd repent,and repent and repent. It's been said that Martin would confess his sins for forgiveness, then go right back to the confessional because he'd have a sinful thought from there to his room.
When he finally realized what grace actually meant he was able to understand where his salvation truly was; in Christ and not of his own effort. That's rebirth.
Martin Luther tried to follow the Bible, but fell short of the true teachings and is by no means an inspired authority of the teaching of the bible any more than I, and for what it's worth and to his credit, Martin Luther did not agree with the Lutheran church wearing his name. ( he stated, "I beg that my name be not mentioned, and that people be called Christians, not Lutherans" (Tappert, 1987, p. 116).)