- Apr 2, 2003
- 22,610
- 5,981
That isn’t quite what he said, although he’ll have to clear up if that is what he was referring to.what do you mean "the godhead is recognized" ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
That isn’t quite what he said, although he’ll have to clear up if that is what he was referring to.what do you mean "the godhead is recognized" ?
They recognize the: head godi understand the eastern part.
what do you mean by the eastern religions "recognize" the godhead?
thank you E most are not glad to see my post haha
Genesis :What does that have to do with Rom. 1:20?
They recognize the: head god
Head - chief / strongest
god - false gods
I will try and find the way you think and speak that mental language. We as members of the body of Christ, just think differently. No liver thinks like a kidney.
eddif
Roughly yes.in many of the Hindu faiths they have a three being godhead. Brahma is at the top, the creator, above the others of the godhead.
is this what you are saying?
Sure. Thank you for the trouble.LOL
Well on the day of Pentecost he placed the law in our hearts and minds.
Hebrews 10:16 KJV
This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;
Jeremiah 31:33 KJV
But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Angels bear messages from God to man and back. They seem to go across nothing.
Nerves in us (as we were created) show the knowledge of how angels work. It is a network.
Daniel 10:12 KJV
Then said he unto me, Fear not, Daniel: for from the first day that thou didst set thine heart to understand, and to chasten thyself before thy God, thy words were heard, and I am come for thy words.
13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.
This scripture is an angel block.
Today we talk about nerve blocks.
That help any?
eddif
I had to add those for your sake, for further explanation and clarification, because you refuse to understand and address what is clearly stated in Scripture. But I have added nothing to Scripture.
Which is...?There's actually another way to understand that passage.
I would submit that when Jesus said, 'unless you believe I am', He was implying that it was He who was in the burning bush who spoke to Moses. When Moses was sent to the Israelites he said, who should I say sent me. The reply was, 'tell them I am has sent you." The passage in Genesis says that the Angel of the LORD appeared to Moses in the bush. We know that the Angel of the LORD is the pre-incarnate Christ. Jesus also said that the words He spoke were not His but the Father's.Which is...?
Burning bush.I would submit that when Jesus said, 'unless you believe I am', He was implying that it was He who was in the burning bush who spoke to Moses. When Moses was sent to the Israelites he said, who should I say sent me. The reply was, 'tell them I am has sent you." The passage in Genesis says that the Angel of the LORD appeared to Moses in the bush. We know that the Angel of the LORD is the pre-incarnate Christ. Jesus also said that the words He spoke were not His but the Father's.
2 And the angel of the LORD appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed.
3 And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt.
4 And when the LORD saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the bush, and said, Moses, Moses. And he said, Here am I.
5 And he said, Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.
6 Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.
7 And the LORD said, I have surely seen the affliction of my people which are in Egypt, and have heard their cry by reason of their taskmasters; for I know their sorrows; (Exod. 3:2-7 KJV)
It says the messenger of the LORD appeared to Moses. Jesus pointed out that He spoke the words of the Father. So, Him speaking in the first person for the Father would be expected. So when He says, "I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, we can understand that these are the words of the Father, but are being spoken by the messenger of the LORD. So, when Jesus says in John 8, 'unless you believe I am', He is indicating that He is the one who was in the bush rather than indicating that He is God.
Also, where is says God called out to Moses, in the Greek Old Testament, it says the Lord called out to him. It uses the word Lord rather than God.
I certainly have no objection to the Trinity either. I just do not believe it is clear enough for anyone to be claiming that belief in the Trinity is an essential. There are certainly verses outside of John indicating that Jesus was preexistent and that all of creation was by and through him, so it is not as though one can reasonably take the position that Jesus did not become the Son of God until his birth or baptism or anything like that. In some sense, he clearly was understood as divine by the earliest Christians, but "divine" does not necessarily equate to "the Second Person of the Trinity." If someone finds it a useful way of thinking about Jesus or the nature of God, I'm fine with that.
Somewhat counterintuitively, the scholarly books on the Trinity that I have read argue that "Son of Man" is Jesus' clearest claim to divinity.
I'm not going to start down the Trinity Road because it has no end, but I am highly suspect of any doctrine that relies primarily on the Gospel of John. The Jesus of John is so utterly different from the Jesus of the Synoptics that it is difficult to believe we are talking about the same individual. Of course, if someone believes all gospels are equally inspired and equally historically accurate, his mileage will vary.
As jaybird suggests, for a doctrine that many Christians regard as fundamental and "so clear," the Trinity certainly has a checkered history and has been the source of an astounding amount of confusion and controversy. If the doctrine were really "so clear," I think all of us who question it would be delighted to acknowledge this.
Unfortunately, many cults and religions deny the truth of the Trinity. From Mormons to Jehovah Witnesses to Muslims they simply call Jesus a prophet or great teacher or anything other than God. However, from Genesis when God says, "Let us make man in our image" to the Jesus' Great Commission when he says, "Go and make disciples..." and then lists the Trinity we say God's word delineating that truth. Even the Apostle Thomas after Jesus rose from the dead said to Jesus, "My Lord and my God." Christians only need to do a little research to find numerous places where the Trinity is mentioned in the Bible.
Actually, He did.Jesus didnt say the exact words I am God
Isaiah 14:12 (look at various translations)What I want to know, is how did He roll away the stone? I know you can't answer that, and I'm sure when I finally see Him face to face, it won't be the first thing on my mind, lol.
God, who created the universe, wouldn't have a problem with a stone.What I want to know, is how did He roll away the stone?