• Love God, and love one another!

    Share your heart for Christ and others in Godly Love

    https://christianforums.net/forums/god_love/

  • Want to discuss private matters, or make a few friends?

    Ask for membership to the Men's or Lady's Locker Rooms

    For access, please contact a member of staff and they can add you in!

  • Wake up and smell the coffee!

    Join us for a little humor in Joy of the Lord

    https://christianforums.net/forums/humor_and_jokes/

  • Need prayer and encouragement?

    Come share your heart's concerns in the Prayer Forum

    https://christianforums.net/forums/prayer/

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes coming in the future!

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

TwoPart?ForFuturists

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hitch
  • Start date Start date
I can't tell if you're pulling my leg with that one or not. Really?

"...you [disciples] will not finish going through the cities of Israel until the Son of Man comes."

"...some of those who are standing here...will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom."

"...hereafter you [Caiaphas] will see THE SON OF MAN SITTING AT THE RIGHT HAND OF POWER, and COMING ON THE CLOUDS OF HEAVEN."



I see your point. You prefer not to use the word "return" over "come."
The text is clear, Jesus says repeatedly he' will come', its His preference not mine.
' I think either works in the context of what He said as long as we see His "return" (or coming) "on the clouds" viewed through the same prophetic language used to describe God's coming in judgment against a nation or people in the O.T.
Agreed.
In other words, return is a perfectly acceptable synonym in this case because He came once as Savior and "returned" in judgment, as Paul writes in Hebrews:

{27} And inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment, {28} so Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to sin, to those who eagerly await Him. Hebrews 9:27-28 (NASB)

If He came once and promised to come again - even if only in the clouds - I'd say that meets the definition of a "return."
I think your point would be valid if it were not for Acts 1;11. I doubt you can locate a similar scene in the OT. The resurrected Lord had just been with them ,in the body, and it is the angels not Jesus who offer the prophecy. A prophecy that makes no mention of judgments in contrast to the Apocalypse.
In that light, certainly His return in judgment upon Israel in 70 AD is something He clearly told His disciples and the Sanhedrin would happen.

Hope that clears up the misunderstanding.
Agreed. The Destruction is obviously the fulfillment of M23 and the passages you mentioned. It is misleading though to insert 'return' as though that is reference to the Second Advent. That is a trick common to futurist and unnecessary. Especially since none of these particualrs require His physical presence
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is hilarious; Exactly why would you suppose the Holy Spirit inspired that particular choice of words? Do you think the Holy Spirit forgot what Jesus had said? And I'd love to know ,since you reject Paul's repeated teaching wrt the Gospel going out, if you also reject the the writer of Hebrews who tells us, under inspiration, at least so I've always believed until now, that Christ came once in the end of the world Right here;
Wars, rumor of wars, earthquakes and many falling away from Gods word only to be deceived by Satan for their lack of knowledge has always been prevalent through out history even the increase of all these things as in the days of Noah before and after the flood as nothing has changed as this world continues to wax worse. According to Paul the Gospel preaching bears fruit, according to you it changes nothing. Not only that, it is a part in the ever worsening world. How can the rapture be possible any moment if there are yet to be fulfilled prophecies, doesnt God know what He has planned ? Can you tell me strait faced the Holy Spirit is behind the notion of teaching the any moment rapture while knowing there or prophecies waiting for fulfillment?
]LOL That is a great example of a symptom of the disease of futurism.

I never ask anyone to agree with me, but I would at least ask you to study the scriptures


And in the very same breath you say;

Holy Spirit can reveal all truths to those who have Spiritual ears and eyes to hear and see what the Spirit is teaching us.




If you can sell it ...

* Do I need to explain the hint?

Futurist have always claimed to be the 'in crowd' ,one need not agree with them but those who are in tuned to the Spirit always do, interesting if tired old implication;


W.E. Blackstone, Jesus Is Coming ,1908 pgs 210,212,213. Emphasis added , portions of this article were first published @1875.


Or not.

Who can define what or where the end of the world was in Paul's time as much of the world was not even discovered yet so they could only go to those places they did know to exist.

I wasn't talking about the Gospel teachings, I was talking about this world waxing worse as what Matthew 24 says and what we are seeing the increase of these things today as we watch the signs God has given to us to watch for before Jesus returns.

I'm not claiming to know all the prophecies yet to be fulfilled except for these two final ones of Satan trying to take his seat as God in Jerusalem and Jesus returning to make an end of all abominations as he destroys sin and cast it into the lake of fire as we the saints of God who's names are written in the book of life will enjoy a blessed eternity with God.

I would not want anyone to agree with me for face value of what I write unless the Holy Spirit gives them confirmation of what they are reading or hearing as the same with any teacher of the word of God.

I am a futurist if that is the label you want to place on me as I want to know those things which must come before the Lords return so as a watchman and a teacher of the word of God I can teach others of what the Holy Spirit teaches me.
 
what sins was the judgement of flood given?

are we that set worldwide. keep in mind if the earth is that way then the rapture would be prewrath and there wouldnt be any jacobs trouble.

hmm a contradiction in the dspy position. imagine that.
 
Who can define what or where the end of the world was in Paul's time as much of the world was not even discovered yet so they could only go to those places they did know to exist.
The Holy Spirit did just fine.
I wasn't talking about the Gospel teachings, I was talking about this world waxing worse as what Matthew 24 says and what we are seeing the increase of these things today as we watch the signs God has given to us to watch for before Jesus returns.
I quoted you accurately and fairly, man up. Since you have publicly claimed to be a teacher it is incumbent on you to speak carefully. There certainly is no need for self proclaimed bible teachers who flatly state that nothing has changed since Noah, completely ignoring the greatness and importance of the life,death and resurrection of Christ as though it never happened.
I'm not claiming to know all the prophecies yet to be fulfilled except for these two final ones of Satan trying to take his seat as God in Jerusalem and Jesus returning to make an end of all abominations as he destroys sin and cast it into the lake of fire as we the saints of God who's names are written in the book of life will enjoy a blessed eternity with God.
You publicly stated on this thread,,,
I too say yes and yes. Now you're back pedaling
I would not want anyone to agree with me for face value of what I write unless the Holy Spirit gives them confirmation of what they are reading or hearing as the same with any teacher of the word of God.
Once again I quoted you accurately and fairly.
I am a futurist if that is the label you want to place on me as I want to know those things which must come before the Lords return so as a watchman and a teacher of the word of God I can teach others of what the Holy Spirit teaches me.
With how you've performed so far I will again suggest a review of the NT.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is misleading though to insert 'return' as though that is reference to the Second Advent. That is a trick common to futurist and unnecessary. Especially since none of these particualrs require His physical presence.
I don't believe I stated (in this thread, anyway) that His second coming or return obviated His physical presence. "Return" implies at least a "second coming" which - as I think we both agree - was "in the clouds."

I think your point would be valid if it were not for Acts 1;11.
I think Acts 1:11 completely affirms what Christ told His disciples and the Sanhedrin:

{9} And after He had said these things, He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight.

{10}
And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. {11} They also said, "Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven." Acts 1:9-11 (NASB)

In other words, He entered heaven "in a cloud." He will return in judgment upon Israel and Jerusalem "in a cloud", exactly as He told His disciples and the Sanhedrin He would. In none of these verses is a bodily presence of Christ demanded by the text. Even Acts 1:9-11 conveys this very OT idea that the Lord - when He comes in judgment upon a nation - comes "on the clouds."

{6} In my distress I called upon the LORD, And cried to my God for help; He heard my voice out of His temple, And my cry for help before Him came into His ears. {7} Then the earth shook and quaked; And the foundations of the mountains were trembling And were shaken, because He was angry. {8} Smoke went up out of His nostrils, And fire from His mouth devoured; Coals were kindled by it. {9} He bowed the heavens also, and came down With thick darkness under His feet. {10} He rode upon a cherub and flew; And He sped upon the wings of the wind. {11} He made darkness His hiding place, His canopy around Him, Darkness of waters, thick clouds of the skies. {12} From the brightness before Him passed His thick clouds, Hailstones and coals of fire. {13} The LORD also thundered in the heavens, And the Most High uttered His voice, Hailstones and coals of fire. Psalm 18:6-13 (NASB)

{2} Clouds and thick darkness surround Him; Righteousness and justice are the foundation of His throne. {3} Fire goes before Him And burns up His adversaries round about. Psalm 97:2-3 (NASB)

{3} He lays the beams of His upper chambers in the waters; He makes the clouds His chariot; He walks upon the wings of the wind; Psalm 104:3 (NASB)

{13} "Behold, he goes up like clouds, And his chariots like the whirlwind; His horses are swifter than eagles. Woe to us, for we are ruined!" {14} Wash your heart from evil, O Jerusalem, That you may be saved. How long will your wicked thoughts Lodge within you? Jeremiah 4:13-14 (NASB)

{3} "For the day is near, Even the day of the LORD is near; It will be a day of clouds, A time of doom for the nations. Ezekiel 30:3 (NASB)

{13} "I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him. Daniel 7:13 (NASB)

Is it any wonder, then, that when Christ told Caiaphas at His trial that he would see Him "coming on the clouds", the whole Sanhedrin tore their robes and accused Him of blasphemy worthy of death?

Jesus Christ Himself consistently and repeatedly appropriated the apocalyptic language of the OT regarding His return to tell the people exactly who He was. Very few believed Him. Those that didn't learned the hard way.

That's what His "second coming" (or return) was all about: to judge Israel (and Judah) in 70 AD in the same manner the Father had judged Israel (and Judah) in 587 BC, and, in so doing, completely and irrevocably end the Law of Moses and with it the curse for disobedience to it.

As you know, the Old Covenant is gone, fully and irrevocably replaced with Christ's kingdom.

Welcome to the New Jerusalem, brother! :thumbsup

Sorry for hijacking the thread, but - as I know you agree - futurists keep looking for something (Christ's kingdom) that has long been established.

Just wanted to make sure we were still on the same page here.
 
Can you cite specific prophecies and fulfillments?



II Thessalonians 2:3 "Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come [it will not be], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;"



 
{3} Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, 2 Thessalonians 2:3 (NASB)

The Second Epistle of Paul to the Thessalonians...is believed by many scholars to be written between 52-54 AD, shortly after the First Epistle to the Thessalonians was written.[1][2]

Nero (Latin: Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus;[1] 15 December 37 – 9 June 68),[2] was Roman Emperor from 54 to 68, and the last in the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Nero was adopted by his great-uncle Claudius to become his heir and successor, and succeeded to the throne in 54 following Claudius' death.

It's very likely that Paul wrote the words of II Thess. 2 within a year or two before Nero took the throne of Rome as Caesar.

Nero beheaded Paul in late 64 or early 65 AD.

And for those who haven't seen - or understood - the cruelty and barbarity of Nero, look at this:

http://rpmedia.ask.com/ts?u=/wikipe...ski_Fackeln.jpg/120px-Siemiradski_Fackeln.jpg

The image depicts Christians hanging on crosses and being covered in wood and pitch to be burned alive to light Nero's gardens at night.

He certainly could be considered as the prime suspect in Paul's letter, given all that he did to Rome, Jerusalem, and the church.
 
The Holy Spirit did just fine. I quoted you accurately and fairly, man up. Since you have publicly claimed to be a teacher it is incumbent on you to speak carefully. There certainly is no need for self proclaimed bible teachers who flatly state that nothing has changed since Noah, completely ignoring the greatness and importance of the life,death and resurrection of Christ as though it never happened. You publicly stated on this thread,,,
I too say yes and yes. Now you're back pedaling Once again I quoted you accurately and fairly. With how you've performed so far I will again suggest a review of the NT.

First we are all teachers of the word of God when we receive knowledge from the Holy Spirit so I am not singling myself out as anything more than a servant of God. I back myself up with scripture so one can study through the Holy Spirit to confirm what I do teach or what even others teach as why would I want someone to follow what I teach apart from the Holy Spirit who reveals all truths.

Can you explain to me what exactly has changed since Noah's days as to me nothing has changed as people are still denying God and his son Christ Jesus, wars and rumors of war are increasing, earthquakes are increasing and the worlds governments are increasing in their attempt of world domination so what exactly has changed since the days of Noah. I am not talking about the life, death and resurrection of Christ as we all know that is a personal relationship that separates us from this world as we are no longer of this world as we are now indwelled with the kingdom of God in our spirit that separates us from this evil world even though we have to live in this world.

As far as my earlier answer I still stand on yes and yes as no one, not even Jesus himself knows when he will return in the clouds, not even the angels, but only God knows the timing of us being caught up to meet Jesus in the air.

I do not know all the prophecies that are yet to be fulfilled except for this one which is the final abomination of desolation when Satan tries to take his final seat once again in Jerusalem proclaiming he is God. I would suggest you read my class on the second coming of Christ before you judge me in anything.
 
earthquakes arent increasing only the ability to detect them. its called establishing a baseline.


if we dont have that how can we know what is normal. if like this if is say man that statue is the biggest, and its the only statue of that size or the only one then how can you know properly what is smaller or even bigger?

yes in that sense its the biggest but you get the point.
 
earthquakes arent increasing only the ability to detect them. its called establishing a baseline. if we dont have that how can we know what is normal.

Put another way, it's like walking up to someone you've never met and telling them they've gained weight.

Ask the people of Pompeii if earthquakes have gotten worse since 79 AD. :lol
 
First we are all teachers of the word of God when we receive knowledge from the Holy Spirit
OK so exactly what passage will you cite in support of this one ?
so I am not singling myself out as anything more than a servant of God. I back myself up with scripture so one can study through the Holy Spirit to confirm what I do teach or what even others teach as why would I want someone to follow what I teach apart from the Holy Spirit who reveals all truths.

Can you explain to me what exactly has changed since Noah's days as to me nothing has changed as people are still denying God and his son Christ Jesus, wars and rumors of war are increasing, earthquakes are increasing and the worlds governments are increasing in their attempt of world domination so what exactly has changed since the days of Noah.
Every continent and every nation on earth contain varying numbers of members of the Kingdom of God, and the church is growing , just as Jesus said it would. Too bad you dont like it. In Noah;s time the entire church added up to a whopping total of 8 souls, with at least one apostate. You need to learn from Jesus something about gradualism and growth through the historic process, I suggest a review of M13.
I am not talking about the life, death and resurrection of Christ as we all know that is a personal relationship that separates us from this world as we are no longer of this world as we are now indwelled with the kingdom of God in our spirit that separates us from this evil world even though we have to live in this world.

As far as my earlier answer I still stand on yes and yes as no one, not even Jesus himself knows when he will return in the clouds,
LOL What does the rapture have to do with the return of Christ?. Im tired of you talking out of both sides of your mouth. It is dishonest of you to attempt to combine the rapture with the return if you are one who holds to the future 'great tribulation' dogma,teaching (sic) as they do that the rapture is an event separated from the return by a 7 year period. Of course you are invited to correct me if I am wrong here.
not even the angels, but only God knows the timing of us being caught up to meet Jesus in the air.

I do not know all the prophecies that are yet to be fulfilled except for this one which is the final abomination of desolation when Satan tries to take his final seat once again in Jerusalem proclaiming he is God. I would suggest you read my class on the second coming of Christ before you judge me in anything.
I have more than enough from your posts. And the bit about the quakes is showing your limitations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Put another way, it's like walking up to someone you've never met and telling them they've gained weight.

Ask the people of Pompeii if earthquakes have gotten worse since 79 AD. :lol
I dont know about you but I felt 10 quakes today and only 7 yesterday.:biglol
 
II Thessalonians 2:3 "Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come [it will not be], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;"
Are you citing this as a prophecy or a fulfillment ?
 
{3} Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, 2 Thessalonians 2:3 (NASB)

The Second Epistle of Paul to the Thessalonians...is believed by many scholars to be written between 52-54 AD, shortly after the First Epistle to the Thessalonians was written.[1][2]

Nero (Latin: Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus;[1] 15 December 37 – 9 June 68),[2] was Roman Emperor from 54 to 68, and the last in the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Nero was adopted by his great-uncle Claudius to become his heir and successor, and succeeded to the throne in 54 following Claudius' death.

It's very likely that Paul wrote the words of II Thess. 2 within a year or two before Nero took the throne of Rome as Caesar.

Nero beheaded Paul in late 64 or early 65 AD.

And for those who haven't seen - or understood - the cruelty and barbarity of Nero, look at this:

http://rpmedia.ask.com/ts?u=/wikipe...ski_Fackeln.jpg/120px-Siemiradski_Fackeln.jpg

The image depicts Christians hanging on crosses and being covered in wood and pitch to be burned alive to light Nero's gardens at night.

He certainly could be considered as the prime suspect in Paul's letter, given all that he did to Rome, Jerusalem, and the church.
Oh yeah? Wheres your chart???
 
I don't believe I stated (in this thread, anyway) that His second coming or return obviated His physical presence. "Return" implies at least a "second coming" which - as I think we both agree - was "in the clouds."
Nope. The nature of the First Advent was not his 'coming' per se but his coming in the flesh.
I think Acts 1:11 completely affirms what Christ told His disciples and the Sanhedrin:

{9} And after He had said these things, He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight.

{10}
And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. {11} They also said, "Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven." Acts 1:9-11 (NASB)

In other words, He entered heaven "in a cloud." He will return in judgment upon Israel and Jerusalem "in a cloud", exactly as He told His disciples and the Sanhedrin He would. In none of these verses is a bodily presence of Christ demanded by the text. Even Acts 1:9-11 conveys this very OT idea that the Lord - when He comes in judgment upon a nation - comes "on the clouds."
Did he ascend bodily or not? If he did ascend bodily what implication does that carry? Dont lose the forest because of all those trees.
{6} In my distress I called upon the LORD, And cried to my God for help; He heard my voice out of His temple, And my cry for help before Him came into His ears. {7} Then the earth shook and quaked; And the foundations of the mountains were trembling And were shaken, because He was angry. {8} Smoke went up out of His nostrils, And fire from His mouth devoured; Coals were kindled by it. {9} He bowed the heavens also, and came down With thick darkness under His feet. {10} He rode upon a cherub and flew; And He sped upon the wings of the wind. {11} He made darkness His hiding place, His canopy around Him, Darkness of waters, thick clouds of the skies. {12} From the brightness before Him passed His thick clouds, Hailstones and coals of fire. {13} The LORD also thundered in the heavens, And the Most High uttered His voice, Hailstones and coals of fire. Psalm 18:6-13 (NASB)

{2} Clouds and thick darkness surround Him; Righteousness and justice are the foundation of His throne. {3} Fire goes before Him And burns up His adversaries round about. Psalm 97:2-3 (NASB)

{3} He lays the beams of His upper chambers in the waters; He makes the clouds His chariot; He walks upon the wings of the wind; Psalm 104:3 (NASB)

{13} "Behold, he goes up like clouds, And his chariots like the whirlwind; His horses are swifter than eagles. Woe to us, for we are ruined!" {14} Wash your heart from evil, O Jerusalem, That you may be saved. How long will your wicked thoughts Lodge within you? Jeremiah 4:13-14 (NASB)

{3} "For the day is near, Even the day of the LORD is near; It will be a day of clouds, A time of doom for the nations. Ezekiel 30:3 (NASB)

{13} "I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him. Daniel 7:13 (NASB)

Is it any wonder, then, that when Christ told Caiaphas at His trial that he would see Him "coming on the clouds", the whole Sanhedrin tore their robes and accused Him of blasphemy worthy of death?
Like I said ,you cant come up with an OT parallel to Acts 1;11 and I cant think of any passage that points to what happened.
Jesus Christ Himself consistently and repeatedly appropriated the apocalyptic language of the OT regarding His return to tell the people exactly who He was. Very few believed Him. Those that didn't learned the hard way.
Agreed. Still He said nothing of 'returning' .
That's what His "second coming" (or return) was all about:
Nope. You have taken pains to interject 'second advent' and 'return' into the Apocalypse, as do the futurists ,and works no better for you.
to judge Israel (and Judah) in 70 AD in the same manner the Father had judged Israel (and Judah) in 587 BC, and, in so doing, completely and irrevocably end the Law of Moses and with it the curse for disobedience to it.
I think you understand but for anyone who doesnt, the scriptures indicate and the overwhelming majority of the church has for centuries hoped for a Second Advent that does require his bodily presence as an 'advent' is different by nature, while it may involve judgment or not it requires his physical presence.
As you know, the Old Covenant is gone, fully and irrevocably replaced with Christ's kingdom.

Welcome to the New Jerusalem, brother! :thumbsup

Sorry for hijacking the thread, but - as I know you agree - futurists keep looking for something (Christ's kingdom) that has long been established.

Just wanted to make sure we were still on the same page here.
Unless I am mistaken we are not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You have taken pains to interject 'second advent' and 'return' into the Apocalypse, as do the futurists ,and works no better for you.
Well then, I guess I don't understand what your issue is, since I have not done so. Define "second advent" and "return" as you understand them, then maybe we can proceed.

I never wrote (in this thread, anyway) His return would happen bodily, (as I once believed) and I believe I was clear, through my highlighting of specific portions of Acts 1:9-11, that His coming "on the clouds" is completely consistent with the OT view of God's coming "on the clouds" in judgment against a given nation or people.

Of course He left the earth bodily. Again, that doesn't obviate the need for His return to be bodily.

Tell you what: define what you understand to be the meaning of the terms "second advent" and "return", (and when you believe these will take place) then maybe we can clear this up.
 
Well then, I guess I don't understand what your issue is, since I have not done so. Define "second advent" and "return" as you understand them, then maybe we can proceed.
Why?
I never wrote (in this thread, anyway) His return would happen bodily,
I didnt say that you did Storm
(as I once believed) and I believe I was clear, through my highlighting of specific portions of Acts 1:9-11, that His coming "on the clouds" is completely consistent with the OT view of God's coming "on the clouds" in judgment against a given nation or people.

Of course He left the earth bodily. Again, that doesn't obviate the need for His return to be bodily.
So the clouds of Acts 1;11 have some important implication, but the fact that this is the only verse of the entire canon in which anything like this happens , specifically ,standing there, visible in the flesh, ascending visibly in the flesh with the angels proclaiming his eventual return-- doesnt carry any weight at all. :toofunny:toofunny:toofunny
Tell you what: define what you understand to be the meaning of the terms "second advent" and "return", (and when you believe these will take place) then maybe we can clear this up.
I'll ask you one question.

Why the pretense ?

You know exactly how these terms are defined
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like I said ,you cant come up with an OT parallel to Acts 1;11 and I cant think of any passage that points to what happened.

{9} And after He had said these things, He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. {10} And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. {11} They also said, "Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven." Acts 1:9-11 (NASB)

Of course there's no OT parallel for Acts 1:11, if someone simply chooses to quote that verse out of context, because there was not, is not, nor ever will be another Jesus Christ. When read in context, however, it's clear what His "second coming" would look like:


"...while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight."

This is the way He entered heaven: in a cloud. Now, look at verse 11:

This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven."

In other words, they watched Him go into heaven "in a cloud" and He will return "in a cloud." If your quibble is simply with the word "return", then that's simply a matter of semantics. His return was not bodily, it was promised to the generation of those left standing "looking up", and it happened - as He said it would - "immediately after the tribulation of those days" in Matthew 24: 70 AD.

If you think by my use of the word "return" I am pointing to some future bodily return of Christ to establish a throne and a kingdom - like David's - in Jerusalem, then I guess I haven't been very clear lately.
 
{9} And after He had said these things, He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. {10} And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. {11} They also said, "Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven." Acts 1:9-11 (NASB)

Of course there's no OT parallel for Acts 1:11, if someone simply chooses to quote that verse out of context, because there was not, is not, nor ever will be another Jesus Christ. When read in context, however, it's clear what His "second coming" would look like:


"...while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight."

This is the way He entered heaven: in a cloud. Now, look at verse 11:

This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven."
It is insane to ignore the facts while claiming to be in context, completely insane.

Where in scripture does the risen Christ speak of judgments coming ?

What does the scripture tell us He was talking to them about in Acts?

Care to explain why the facts other than the clouds, and the subject of the Lord's conversation, has nothing at all to do with the context?
In other words, they watched Him go into heaven "in a cloud" and He will return "in a cloud." If your quibble is simply with the word "return", then that's simply a matter of semantics.
LOL
His return was not bodily, it was promised to the generation of those left standing "looking up",
Really ? Where in Acts does any man or angel or the Lord himself say this ?
and it happened - as He said it would - "immediately after the tribulation of those days" in Matthew 24: 70 AD.

If you think by my use of the word "return" I am pointing to some future bodily return of Christ to establish a throne and a kingdom - like David's - in Jerusalem, then I guess I haven't been very clear lately.
LOL I already said I did not , POST #57 got it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is insane to ignore the facts while claiming to be in context, completely insane.

I don't get you.

Where in scripture does the risen Christ speak of judgments coming ?

In the passages I cited that prompted this whole exchange. You should probably revisit them (Matt. 10, 16, 26. You can throw in Matt. 24, too for good measure.)

Would still like to read your definition of "second advent" and "return" as you understand these terms.

Thanks.
 
Back
Top