• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

What did 2 Thessalonians mean to the Thessalonians?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matthew24:34
  • Start date Start date
Matthew24:34 said:
Paul wrote this second letter to the first-century Thessalonians. What did he clearly mean to convey to them? How would they have understood his words? I would like to see objective exegesis here rather than application! Thanks!

Matthew24:34
Many miss the message of God's coming in this in 2 Thess 2:3-12 the events that come forth, that will bring in Christ and our being changed and lifted up to him.

Some of the Thessalonians were told that Jesus had come and they were unsettled as verse 2 points out. Paul then goes on to speak about the events that must happen first.

The coming of the Lawless one,verse 9, a man who will enter into God's temple and it will be in accordance with the works of Satan, displayed in all kinds of counterfeit miracles and every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. Paul says these people are perishing because they refused to love the TRUTH and so BE SAVED. I Thess 1:8 says these people will be those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of the Lord Jesus.

This Man is close to being revealed and a great falling away from the faith is going to happen when he is revealed. 2 Thess 2:3. Trust the Lord for our salvation is near. :yes
 
Originally posted by Matthew24:34
You can clearly understand Tom Bombadil

Who says I understand Tom Bombadil? Nobody understands Bombadil. Tolkien himself didn't understand Bombadil (one of the great mysteries of our time
lol.gif
).

But I do know the Scriptures, and understand the first test of any interpretation, the matter of overall Biblical harmony. Can we do a bit of Quid Pro Quo here? Please, address some of my points (if you can :D).
 
Osgiliath said:
Originally posted by Matthew24:34
You can clearly understand Tom Bombadil

Who says I understand Tom Bombadil? Nobody understands Bombadil. Tolkien himself didn't understand Bombadil (one of the great mysteries of our time
lol.gif
).

But I do know the Scriptures, and understand the first test of any interpretation, the matter of overall Biblical harmony. Can we do a bit of Quid Pro Quo here? Please, address some of my points (if you can :D).

Osgiliath: I will not address any of your points--whatever they were. I began this thread to STUDY and LOOK AT hermeneutically abd exegetically 2 Thessalonians. I presented, based on those principles of Bible Study, my understanding of Paul's words in his letter to the Thessalonians. You and Shilohsfoal decided to immediately hijack the thread and go off on rabbit trails because you detest everything I stand for eschatologically and refuse to even consider intelligently and logically the things I present even when I deal exclusively with the very words of the Scripture. When you accomplish the PURPOSE of this thread, I will address your points.

If you would like to ask me questions that do not deal with a verse-be-verse study of Thessalonians in its context, I will be more than pleased to adequately and substantially answer you. YES, I CAN!

P. S. Maybe you shouldn't quote someone you don't understand! :wave

Matthew24:34
 
Originally posted by Matthew24:34
You and Shilohsfoal decided to immediately hijack the thread and go off on rabbit trails

Hijack? Matthew, I don't know if you noticed or not, but we're all you've got. No one else wants to talk about this. Be glad we're saying anything at all. If I didn't answer in the first place, you would have continued posting to yourself :lol.

Originally posted by Matthew24:34
I will not address any of your points--whatever they were

If you do not understand the utter simplicity of my next to last post, and the clear, elementary points therein, then I have truly been wasting my time, and I owe you an apology :approve.

Originally posted by Matthew24:34
When you accomplish the PURPOSE of this thread, I will address your points.

All I've been doing in every thread is addressing YOUR points, and accomplishing the so-called purpose of YOUR questions - thoroughly and exhaustively, documenting everything methodically. Yet you never address mine (or anyone else's). So it’s quite obvious that ...no, you can't. Shall I repost all of my Scriptural replies from all threads to remind you? It took a long time to compose some of those replies to YOUR questions, yet you only care for your own agenda…..ALWAYS! Every time I have refuted your doctrine Scripturally, you slither away to another thread. Stop making excuses and answer someone for once! The burden of proof is on you, not me. Prove to me that Christ has returned. Address my points. No one here is going to take you seriously until you start returning favors, and answering questions. We've done more than our part - your turn!
 
Osgiliath said:
Originally posted by Matthew24:34
You and Shilohsfoal decided to immediately hijack the thread and go off on rabbit trails

Hijack? Matthew, I don't know if you noticed or not, but we're all you've got. No one else wants to talk about this. Be glad we're saying anything at all. If I didn't answer in the first place, you would have continued posting to yourself :lol.

[quote:seb60bip]Originally posted by Matthew24:34
I will not address any of your points--whatever they were

If you do not understand the utter simplicity of my next to last post, and the clear, elementary points therein, then I have truly been wasting my time, and I owe you an apology :approve.

Originally posted by Matthew24:34
When you accomplish the PURPOSE of this thread, I will address your points.

All I've been doing in every thread is addressing YOUR points, and accomplishing the so-called purpose of YOUR questions - thoroughly and exhaustively, documenting everything methodically. Yet you never address mine (or anyone else's). So it’s quite obvious that ...no, you can't. Shall I repost all of my Scriptural replies from all threads to remind you? It took a long time to compose some of those replies to YOUR questions, yet you only care for your own agenda…..ALWAYS! Every time I have refuted your doctrine Scripturally, you slither away to another thread. Stop making excuses and answer someone for once! The burden of proof is on you, not me. Prove to me that Christ has returned. Address my points. No one here is going to take you seriously until you start returning favors, and answering questions. We've done more than our part - your turn![/quote:seb60bip]

Osgiliath: You have NOT been addressing the points of THIS thread, Osgiliath. And I have answered your questions and complaints over and over again. Simply because you refuse to accept those answers, does not give you the right to accuse me of not answering you. Furthermore, Osgiliath, I find your idea of exhaustive and documentation to be nothing more than posting a bunch of verses out of context as your answer to everything. I HAVE ADDRESSED YOU QUESTIONS, Osgiliath. Reread them! I can't help it if you do not like my answers!

Will you respect the topic of this thread? Will you exegete 2 Thessalonians verse by verse. That is the blueprint here. You will not come on this thread and rehash everything you have ever told me on other threads, Osgiliath. Again, this thread is for exegeting 2 Thessalonians. Please do so or start your own thread! You are attempting to hijack this one. I am asking you to stop!

Matthew24:34
 
Originally posted by Matthew24:34
I find your idea of exhaustive and documentation to be nothing more than posting a bunch of verses out of context

Out of context my butt! Why don't you actually read them. By stating that, you’re refuting the Word of God, not me
ohboy.gif


OK, since I have no choice in the matter, and I would rather post SOMETHING, rather than not post anything at all (and because I’m probably the only person that will participate), I’ll indulge you.

I’ll start with the very basics, and then proceed.

QUESTION # 1. Let’s just say that Paul was speaking ONLY to the Thessalonians (with no possibility of him speaking to ANYONE else); how would Paul know when Jesus was returning? Jesus didn’t even know, only the Father.

Mark 13:32 "No one knows when that day or hour will come-not the angels in heaven, not the Son, but only the Father.â€Â

Matthew 24:36 “But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark,
39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.â€Â



Was Paul given special information that even the angels in heaven, or Jesus Himself was not?

There are many verses that indicate that the disciples were watching for the Lord to come in their lifetimes (obviously in obedience to His command to be ready). In our day, many are still obediently watching for Christ to come. The same expectancy we have for the return of Jesus in our day also existed in New Testament times, but do we mistakenly call this expectancy a certainty that he WOULD return in their lifetimes? It was written many times that Jesus would be gone for a long time:

Revelation 6:10 "And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?"

James 5:7 "Be patient therefore, brethren, until the coming of the Lord. Behold, the farmer waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receiveth the early and the latter rain."

Luke 20:9 "Then he began to speak to the people this parable; A certain man planted a vineyard, and let it out to vinedressers, and went into a far country for a long time."

Luke 18:7 "And shall not God avenge his own elect, who cry day and night to him, though he beareth long with them?"

Mark 13:34 "For the Son of man is as a man taking a long journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch.

Matthew 25:5 While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept."

Matthew 25:19 "After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them."

Hebrews 10:36 "For ye have need of patience, that, after ye have done the will of God, ye may receive the promise."

Romans 11:25 "For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part hath happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles shall be come in."


As I said in my previous post; “So what if the Thessalonians believed Christ was returning in their lifetime - so has every generationâ€Â. How would they know? How would Paul know? Did Paul even claim for a certainty that Jesus would return in the Thessalonians’ lifetime? Paul was simply telling them events that MUST happen before Jesus returned, events that HAVEN’T HAPPENED YET!

1Thessalonians 4:13 “Brothers, we do not want you to be ignorant about those who fall asleep, or to grieve like the rest of men, who have no hope.
14 We believe that Jesus died and rose again and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him.
15 According to the Lord's own word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left till the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep.
16 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.
17 After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord for ever
.â€Â


Now, hopefully you can thoroughly answer this most basic of questions, so we can move on.
 
Osgiliath said:
Originally posted by Matthew24:34
I find your idea of exhaustive and documentation to be nothing more than posting a bunch of verses out of context

Out of context my butt! Why don't you actually read them. By stating that, you’re refuting the Word of God, not me
ohboy.gif


OK, since I have no choice in the matter, and I would rather post SOMETHING, rather than not post anything at all (and because I’m probably the only person that will participate), I’ll indulge you.

I’ll start with the very basics, and then proceed.

QUESTION # 1. Let’s just say that Paul was speaking ONLY to the Thessalonians (with no possibility of him speaking to ANYONE else); how would Paul know when Jesus was returning? Jesus didn’t even know, only the Father.

Mark 13:32 "No one knows when that day or hour will come-not the angels in heaven, not the Son, but only the Father.â€Â

Matthew 24:36 “But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark,
39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.â€Â



Was Paul given special information that even the angels in heaven, or Jesus Himself was not?

There are many verses that indicate that the disciples were watching for the Lord to come in their lifetimes (obviously in obedience to His command to be ready). In our day, many are still obediently watching for Christ to come. The same expectancy we have for the return of Jesus in our day also existed in New Testament times, but do we mistakenly call this expectancy a certainty that he WOULD return in their lifetimes? It was written many times that Jesus would be gone for a long time:

Revelation 6:10 "And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?"

James 5:7 "Be patient therefore, brethren, until the coming of the Lord. Behold, the farmer waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receiveth the early and the latter rain."

Luke 20:9 "Then he began to speak to the people this parable; A certain man planted a vineyard, and let it out to vinedressers, and went into a far country for a long time."

Luke 18:7 "And shall not God avenge his own elect, who cry day and night to him, though he beareth long with them?"

Mark 13:34 "For the Son of man is as a man taking a long journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch.

Matthew 25:5 While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept."

Matthew 25:19 "After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them."

Hebrews 10:36 "For ye have need of patience, that, after ye have done the will of God, ye may receive the promise."

Romans 11:25 "For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part hath happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles shall be come in."


As I said in my previous post; “So what if the Thessalonians believed Christ was returning in their lifetime - so has every generationâ€Â. How would they know? How would Paul know? Did Paul even claim for a certainty that Jesus would return in the Thessalonians’ lifetime? Paul was simply telling them events that MUST happen before Jesus returned, events that HAVEN’T HAPPENED YET!

1Thessalonians 4:13 “Brothers, we do not want you to be ignorant about those who fall asleep, or to grieve like the rest of men, who have no hope.
14 We believe that Jesus died and rose again and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him.
15 According to the Lord's own word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left till the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep.
16 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.
17 After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord for ever
.â€Â


Now, hopefully you can thoroughly answer this most basic of questions, so we can move on.

Osgiliath: Do you know how to exegete a passage of Scripture? Again, you did not exegete 2 Thessalonians. You did again exactly what I rightly accused you of. You again post a bunch of verses OUT OF CONTEXT! And again, now I have to put them in CONTEXT for you!

Here's the first point--Jesus did not know the day and the hour but He knew the GENERATION. "THIS GENERATION (THIS, THIS, THIS GENERATION, Osgiliath) will by no means pass away until ALL these things take place! (Matthew 24:34). That is what Paul knew. How do you suppose Paul knew anything that he wrote? Was he not given special revelation? He knew things others did not know--how else do you suppose he could teach the things he taught throughout his epistles?

Verse 36 is again addressed directly to THOSE disciples right there with Him. THEY were to watch, Osgiliath! WE are not the YE!

WHERE is it written that Jesus was to be gone for a long, long time, Osgiliath? Are you saying that is what Revelation 6:10 is saying? Again, you rip things out of context. Read on, Osgiliath. "And it was said to THEM that they should rest A LITTLE WHILE LONGER (Rev. 6:11)! Do you see why CONTEXT is so important? Furthermore, this is exactly what the Thessalonians were promised. This is the same avenging Paul is addressing in 2 Thessalonians 1:7. Paul told THEM that God was going to repay those who had troubled THEM at His coming! CONTEXT! It was NOT a long, long time! John was shown those things which were to SHORTLY take place, Osgiliath. That is the CONTEXT!

And do you not know that those parable in the Gospels (which you again quote OUT OF CONTEXT in order to serve your own means) are dealing with the long time during which God dealt with Israel. They deal also with the many prophets that were sent to her throughout the years--prophets they killed. Read Matthew 23! That is why THEY were guilty of "all the righteous blood shed on the earth." God's dealing with Israel was a long time--until He finally brought them to their end in A. D. 70!

AND what comes immediately after Hebrews 10:36, Osgiliath. If you had looked at the CONTEXT, you would have seen it and not misrepresented this verse. The writer of Hebrews quotes Habakkuk 2:3, 4 because it is appropriate for his time. "For YET A LITTLE WHILE, and He who is coming WILL COME and WILL NOT TARRY" (Hebrews 10:37)!

Romans 11:25--You are assuming that you know what the fullness of the Gentiles is and then use this verse to proclaim that His coming is far off! Notice that Paul expected his "brethren" to understand what it was.

AND look again at the CONTEXT of 1 Thessalonians 4. Paul says WE--in that WE he includes himself and those Thessalonians to whom he is writing! WE, WE, WE WHO ARE ALIVE! WE, WE, WE who are left until the COMING of the Lord!!!!! WE, WE, WE who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so WE, WE, WE will be with the Lord forever. Therefore, comfort one another with these words." That was THEIR comfort at that time--THEY were going to experience these things. What comfort would it be for this to occur thousands of years later. WE, WE, WE are NOT the WE, WE, WE of 1Thessalonians 4!

AND again, what about the next verse in James 5? The coming of the Lord is AT HAND," Osgiliath. It was AT HAND to those of James' day. That is the CONTEXT. Yet you rip verses out to serve your own means!

This is the last time I am going to take the time to put into context the verses which you abuse. And again, the topic of this thread is EXEGETING 2 Thessalonians. Paul was clearly telling THEM that the Lord was going to give THEM rest at His appearing and at that same time He was going to repay those very persecutors of THAT day who troubled THEM. You can ignore the CONTEXT all you want and make general statements that every generation expected that, but that is not what the passage says. You don't like what it clearly says, Osgiliath, so you refuse to exegete verse by verse. Can you do that, Osgiliath. Can you take one verse at a time and see what it says apart from your preconceived ideas?

WHAT DOES IT SAY?

AND again, if you want to discuss these others verses and your other topics, please start your own thread. THIS thread is for those who want to EXEGETE 2 Thessalonians. By the way, that is why only a few have joined into this thread. Exegesis is hard work. Most people, including yourself, do not want to take the time. It's easier to bounce around, take verses out of context that one THINKS supports his presuppositions, and form a false doctrine out of them!
 
Out of context? Exegesis? What are you smoking? Here is the CONTEXT of 2 Thessalonians 2 (your original topic). There is one subject and one object:

"2 Thessalonians 2:1 "Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him "

The one subject, exegesis, context, object, etc. is “THE COMING OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST! Paul then explains the very things that must transpire BEFORE He does! PERIOD! Every sentence and every verse I have been posting is precisely referring to THE COMING OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST! Nothing to “EXEGETE†there. Now, can you proceed with your analysis please so we can get this moving along. *edited by staff... enough name calling already!*
 
Osgiliath said:
Out of context? Exegesis? What are you smoking? Here is the CONTEXT of 2 Thessalonians 2 (your original topic). There is one subject and one object:

"2 Thessalonians 2:1 "Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him "

The one subject, exegesis, context, object, etc. is “THE COMING OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST! Paul then explains the very things that must transpire BEFORE He does! PERIOD! Every sentence and every verse I have been posting is precisely referring to THE COMING OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST! Nothing to “EXEGETE†there. Now, can you proceed with your analysis please so we can get this moving along. Enough with your feigned elitist smugness.
Would you please explain what the phrases "the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" and "our gathering together unto him" mean from your point of view?
 
Originally posted by Sinthesis
Would you please explain what the phrases "the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" and "our gathering together unto him" mean from your point of view?

"My" point of view, or "exegesis" is irrelevant.

2 Peter 1:20 “knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation.â€Â

God's Word is quite sufficient on its own, and I don't fiddle with it:

Revelation 1:7 "Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen."

Acts 1:11 "Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven."

1 Thessalonians 4:17 "Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord."

Philippians 2:11 "And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father."

1 John 3:2 "Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is."

Jude 1:14 "And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints"

2 Thessalonians. 1:7-9, "And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels in flaming fire, taking vengeance on them that know not God and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ; who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his power, when he shall come to be glorified in his saints . . ."

Revelation 19:11 "And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.
13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God;
18 That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.
19 And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
21 And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh."

Luke 17:24 "For as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one part under heaven, shineth unto the other part under heaven; so shall also the Son of man be in his day."
 
Osgiliath said:
Originally posted by Sinthesis
Would you please explain what the phrases "the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" and "our gathering together unto him" mean from your point of view?

"My" point of view, or "exegesis" is irrelevant.
It is relevant as you two are both reading the same things yet coming up with different meanings. You may just want to be two fools yelling at each other about how each of you is holier than the other. Or you could first take the simple task of first defining what the phrases "the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" and "our gathering together unto him" used in 2 Thessalonians 2:1 mean.
 
Originally posted by Sinthesis
You may just want to be two fools yelling at each other about how each of you is holier than the other.

Who's talking about being holy? I may love the Lord, but I'm certainly not what you would call "holy", and never claimed to be. If anything, I'm definitely a little "rough around the edges", but I do have a principled commitment to Biblical accuracy. That has nothing to do with me, it is The Word that is holy, not me.

It is relevant as you two are both reading the same things yet coming up with different meanings

Why do you think I let God's Word do the talking? God’s Word has just explained how/what the coming of the Lord is, why do you need my opinion? Is "the coming of the Lord" in 2 Thessalonians speaking of a unique “separate†coming of the Lord, different from the 20 verses mentioned above? If it is, then there must be another “coming of the Lordâ€Â. If it is NOT referring to a different coming, then the issue of “contex†is moot.
 
Shilohsfoal said:
Mt 24;42-43
Watch therefore;for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
But know this,that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come,he would have watched,and would not have sufferd his house to be broken up.


Preterism teaches its students how not to watch.It teaches there is nothing to watch.
But I believe it does serve a purpose in the fact that the scripture that states the day of the Lord will come upon some as a thief in the night should be forfilled.


Shiloh, Is this the same Thief's coming Jesus promised would befall the unrepentant of the first century Church at Sardis (Rev. 3-3) or is this a different Thief's coming you are talking about?
 
I guess the whole thing is very simple then. Why don't you just prove that Jesus Christ HAS returned, case closed. Since prophecy has already been fulfilled, there is no need to bother with all of the prophetic interpretations and etymological hocus pocus anymore. Just answer the simple question - if Jesus has indeed returned, regardless of when you or I believe He was prophesied to return, show me proof that He returned, not a verse that "makes sense" IF He has; but proof He actually has. This shouldn't be too hard, after all, the mystery is finished; right?

Revelation 10:7 “But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God will be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets.â€Â
 
Os, there of a type of parousia in 70AD but the actual and physical one, as described in Acts 1, is yet to come.
 
Originally posted by Vic C
Os, there of a type of parousia in 70AD but the actual and physical one, as described in Acts 1, is yet to come.

I agree. Indeed the "physical" coming is yet to come, but not according to some ;). I’ve got no Biblical issue with partial preterism. It’s usually a little further than I choose to go in many cases, but almost all Christians (futurists included) are partial preterists to some degree. We all realize that some prophecies were indeed fulfilled in 70 AD. However, to claim that ALL PROPHECIES were fulfilled is absurd, and a clear indication of not rightly dividing God's Word. Nonsense.
 
Osgiliath said:
I guess the whole thing is very simple then. Why don't you just prove that Jesus Christ HAS returned, case closed. Since prophecy has already been fulfilled, there is no need to bother with all of the prophetic interpretations and etymological hocus pocus anymore. Just answer the simple question - if Jesus has indeed returned, regardless of when you or I believe He was prophesied to return, show me proof that He returned, not a verse that "makes sense" IF He has; but proof He actually has. This shouldn't be too hard, after all, the mystery is finished; right?


So let me get this straight, you are asking for extra biblical proof?
You believe there is an authority above scripture that should be cited as proof before you will believe?
 
Osgiliath said:
I’ve got no Biblical issue with partial preterism. It’s usually a little further than I choose to go in many cases, but almost all Christians (futurists included) are partial preterists to some degree. We all realize that some prophecies were indeed fulfilled in 70 AD. However, to claim that ALL PROPHECIES were fulfilled is absurd, and a clear indication of not rightly dividing God's Word. Nonsense.


On this point I am in full agreement.
All Christians are preterist. we only vary by degree.

Indeed, even the Full preterist must admit to the ongoing and future fulfillment of certain bible prophesy. For there are some prophesies, by their very nature,that have no terminus point and are in a constant state of ongoing Fulfillment, each day bringing a greater fulfillment than the day previous. Isaiah 9:7 comes to mind as one of them.
 
Vic C. said:
Os, there of a type of parousia in 70AD but the actual and physical one, as described in Acts 1, is yet to come.


But, even the hyper-literal futurist must admit to some sort of spiritual aspect of the acts 1:11 coming, to fit it into the coming of revelation that every eye would see, since in order for Christ to come "in like manner" as the disciples saw him go into heaven, he would have to be visible only to a small group of people since that is how they saw him go......

The Physical return of a 5'8" Jesus that is visible to 6 billion people at the same time (even the blind ones) creates more problems than it solves for the hyper literlaist who's theory rests on the absence of any spiritual aspect.
 
Originally posted by parousia70
But, even the hyper-literal futurist must admit to some sort of spiritual aspect of the acts 1:11 coming, to fit it into the coming of revelation that every eye would see, since in order for Christ to come "in like manner" as the disciples saw him go into heaven, he would have to be visible only to a small group of people since that is how they saw him go......

That’s a real stretch. Let’s make every wisp of every cloud, every leaf on every tree, and every blade of grass where His feet left the ground exactly the same while were at it ;). I think the intended meaning of that verse is quite intuitive. If not, I’ll have a word with Luke personally when I see him :D.

Originally posted by parousia70
The Physical return of a 5'8" Jesus that is visible to 6 billion people at the same time (even the blind ones) creates more problems than it solves for the hyper literlaist who's theory rests on the absence of any spiritual aspect.

No one is saying that there is an absence of any spiritual aspect. We’re saying there is more than JUST the spiritual aspect when Christ returns. If it was JUST a spiritual return, how would that be any different than what occurred on Pentecost Day in Acts chapter 2? In fact, how would that be any different than accepting and believing in Jesus Christ?
 
Back
Top