Is Jesus in this? Or is it only OT? Who plays Jesus?Here's Hollywood for you;
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Is Jesus in this? Or is it only OT? Who plays Jesus?Here's Hollywood for you;
None of the parables happened.
That's why it's a parable.
The Prodigal is believed to be a parable.
The Rich Man and Lazarus (Luke 19) is true.
When Adam & Eve ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was that evil not evil?
Could you please expound on this? It's the first time I have ever seen the idea with regards to Adam asking God to heal Eve, and the "life for a life" comment doesn't make sense to me.
cs lewis correctly points out that Christianity is a -miracle religion- . God becomes Flesh! Born of a virgin, no less! sinless! unjustly Crucified! Resurrected!
see? if one accepts the basics, just...Christianity 101...then it logically follows that God -can- , should He choose, intervene in this fallen, crazy world of ours.
You don't think the Lazarus/richman story-lesson is a parable?None of the parables happened.
That's why it's a parable.
The Prodigal is believed to be a parable.
The Rich Man and Lazarus (Luke 19) is true.
Knowledge of good and evil didn't make Adam and Eve evil. The only evil one that was there was satan, the serpent.
Quantrill
This has been debated for 2000 years over whether it's a parable or actual happening..You don't think the Lazarus/richman story-lesson is a parable?
So, what happened when A & E ate from the tree of the knowledge of good & evil? What was its purpose?
Amen to that.When Eve ate, she fell and was a sinner. When Adam ate, he fell and the human race with him fell, and became sinners.
They now had the knowledge of good and evil in their fallen state.
Just because Adam and Eve fell, they did not become children of satan, or evil. They were still children of God but fallen. They were now affected by the world and satan who is the prince of this world. They were children of wrath as God's judgement was upon them.
This is, I believe, true of every one who is a believer, a Christian today. We were never children of the devil. We were lost children of God.
Quantrill
You said you only believe the truth, and Hollywood tells the truth.Is Jesus in this? Or is it only OT? Who plays Jesus?
I believed Hollywood when I was a kid.Hollywood tells the truth.
I'd like to clarify this with you: do you say she had already died a spiritual death in that moment? Or do you say that she would go on to eventually die a carnal death?I'm referring to the fact that Eve died.
Mark 5:15 shows that the man with the demons was healed and "in his right mind", and it did not require an atoning sacrifice. He also healed many others without having to require from them anything further than repentance: "leave your life of sin".God did in fact bring healing and life through the Last Adam who gave Himself for His bride also. But because God identified all of the human race fallen in one, Adam, then so can many be saved through One, Christ.
It shows me that your basis for having assumed that Eve could not be healed is rooted in your view of God that is formed by the teachings of Substitutionary Atonement. Insofaras I recognise that view is unscriptural and a mischaracterisation of God, it does answer my question. I also would not agree on that basis that it is impossible for God to heal Eve without requiring a life in her place.Does that help?
Quantrill
Amen to that.
Just as The Lord comes to seek His lost sheep mow He went to the garden to seek Adam and Eve and called out to them just as He does to us.
I'd like to clarify this with you: do you say she had already died a spiritual death in that moment? Or do you say that she would go on to eventually die a carnal death?
Mark 5:15 shows that the man with the demons was healed and "in his right mind", and it did not require an atoning sacrifice. He also healed many others without having to require from them anything further than repentance: "leave your life of sin".
It shows me that your basis for having assumed that Eve could not be healed is rooted in your view of God that is formed by the teachings of Substitutionary Atonement. Insofaras I recognise that view is unscriptural and a mischaracterisation of God, it does answer my question. I also would not agree on that basis that it is impossible for God to heal Eve without requiring a life in her place.
It really only shows the dangers of speculating.It shows you don't understand what we are talking about.
Evil came in when Eve first chose disobedience in taking that bite. Exercising free will to disobey was/is evil. Now knowing this, she manipulated Adam to partake. Evil came to fruition. Thus, you will know them by their fruits.When Adam & Eve ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was that evil not evil?
You always make me think. Sometimes I really like that and sometimes I get ascared by you lol.None of the parables happened.
That's why it's a parable.
The Prodigal is believed to be a parable.
The Rich Man and Lazarus (Luke 19) is true.
It really only shows the dangers of speculating.
You'd better explain yourself because it just looks like an unsupported statement. How can you expect anyone to believe a demon possessed person isn't lost? (James 5:20).The difference between the fall of Eve and one who is sick or demon possessed is not speculation.
No, the speculation is "why did Adam take the fruit that Eve gave her?". Look where it leads us - shedding blood and strangling each other "accept my teaching!!!" .. and yet the scripture doesn't give us the answer to that question. So that's why it's dangerous to speculate. I normally don't do it at all, but I wanted to help humble soul get thinking more about the value of Paul's views. ... How is it that you and I began to exchange blows?Understanding 'substitution' in the doctrine of soteriology is not speculation.
Quantrill