Our Scripture ? or our interpretation of Scripture
Hi, Reba,
Both scripture and interpretation. The words have been changed, the divinity of Christ has been "watered down," and the meaning has been corrupted (though admittedly the meaning has always been cloudy.)
In both of the next two verses the NKJV makes interpretation more difficult; in the case of Daniel, almost impossible.
----------------
(Gen 15:18)
KJV
" In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:" (Gen 15:18)
NKJV
"On the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying: “To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates— " (Gen 15:18)
The NT verse that conflicts with the NKJV OT for context:
"Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,”[a] who is Christ." (Gal 3:16)
------------------
Daniel 9:27
KJV
"And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:"
NKJV
"Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;. . ."
The use of "Then" vs "And" changes the context completely, rendering it useless as prophecy.
-----------------------------------------------------
The Divinity of Christ:
1 John 5:7
KJV: For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
ASV: And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth.
DARBY: or they that bear witness are three:
HCSB: For there are three that testify:
NIV: For there are three that testify:
RSV: And the Spirit is the witness, because the Spirit is the truth.
NAB: So there are three that testify (Catholic)
NWT: For there are three witness bearers: (Jehovah Witness)
Scofield Note: "It is generally agreed that v.7 has no real authority, and has been inserted."
[The story is that Scofield used the KJV so he could sell his bibles, but he didn't like the KJV.]
--------------
The following is more significant than at first glance to many people. The reference to the Son of God in Daniel helps to validate Christ's statement, "Before Abraham was, I am" (John 8:58)
Daniel 3:25
KJV: He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like
the Son of God.
Now, the watered-down versions:
ASV: He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the aspect of the fourth is like
a son of the gods.
DARBY: He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the appearance of the fourth is like
a son of God.
HCSB: He exclaimed, “Look! I see four men, not tied, walking around in the fire unharmed; and the fourth looks like
a son of the gods.”[
a] -- [a] or of a divine being
NAB: In the fire Azariah stood up and prayed aloud:
NWT: He said: “Look! I see four men walking about free in the midst of the fire, and they are unharmed, and the fourth one looks like
a son of the gods.”
---------------------------------
Interpretation
Interpretation was "enhanced" by the introduction of the Scofield Reference Bible in 1909. By "enhanced" I mean, enhanced in a manner that favored those who hate Christ. The role of the Church in society has been damaged by Scofield, which made it more difficult for the people to recognize the forces of antichrist. By "antichrist", I do not mean Scofield's imaginary "evil world leader;" but those who deny and despise the notion of the divinity of Christ (like John wrote of;) and who work night and day to destroy Christianity by destroying its landmarks of morality, truth, freedom, etc..
Approach Scofield Notes with the understanding that everything he wrote was an attempt to undermine Christianity, and he is much easier to understand. These are a few examples:
Scofield note on John the Baptist as the fulfillment of Malachi 4:5,6
(1)
Christ confirms the specific and still unfulfilled prophecy of Mal 4:5,6: "Elias shall truly first come and restore all things."
Here, as in Malachi, the prediction fulfilled in John the Baptist, and that yet to be fulfilled in Elijah, are kept distinct.
(2) But John the Baptist had come already, and with a ministry so completely in the spirit and power of Elijah's future ministry Lk 1:17 that i
n an adumbrative and typical sense it could be said: "Elias is come already.
Still unfulfilled? Christ specifically stated John the Baptist was Elijah! I believe Scofield's purpose was to make Christ's words less authoritative.
One of the reasons Judaism rejected Jesus was because Elijah the Prophet had not come before him. This is a statement by the 2nd Century Jewish Rabbi, Trypho, in a conversation with Justin Martyr:
And Trypho said, “Those who affirm him to have been a man, and to have been anointed by election, and then to have become Christ, appear to me to speak more plausibly than you who hold those opinions which you express. For we all expect that Christ will be a man [born] of men, and that Elijah when he comes will anoint him. But if this man appear to be Christ, he must certainly be known as man [born] of men; but from the circumstance that Elijah has not yet come, I infer that this man is not He [the Christ].”
Scofield note on the soldier piercing Jesus with his spear:
John wrote that Zechariah 12:10 was fulfilled when the Jesus was pierced:
"For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken. And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced." (John 19:36-37)
Scofield note: [blank]
This is Scofields agenda:
Zech. 12.-14. from one prophecy
the general theme of which is the return of the Lord and the establishment of the (Israeli) kingdom:
The solution: completely ignore John's words and pretend the verse relates to the earthly Israel in the distant future.
(3) the "latter rain" in the pouring out of the Spirit and the personal revelation of Christ to the family of David and the remnant in Jerusalem, not merely as the glorious Deliverer, but
as the One whom Israel pierced and has long rejected (Zech 12:10);
Eve as a type of Church and bride of Christ
I kid you not. This is the actual note on Eve in Gen 2:23:
"Eve, type of the Church as bride of Christ Jn 3:28,29 2Cor 11:2 Eph 5:25-32 Rev 19:7,8"
Check out each of the four Scofield references from above that supposedly support his claim. Afterward, ask yourself if you any idea whatsoever where he got the notion that Eve was a "type of the Church as bride of Christ" from any of those references? His notes are littered with that strategy: throw a blizzard of nonsensical references at the reader. Since it is rare a Scofield disciple complains about the content of the notes, I can only guess they are too embarrassed to admit they don't understand.
A few other "Notes" that have no relation whatsoever to the scripture referenced, but tend to undermine the Church:
Scofield note Genesis 11:1
"The history of Babel ("
confusion")
strikingly parallels that of the professing Church."
Scofield note Daniel 1 chapter
"Daniel is the indispensable introduction to New Testament prophecy, the themes of which are, the
apostasy of the Church. . . "
Scofield note Daniel 9:24
"
When the Church- age will end, and the seventieth week begin, is nowhere revealed."
You and I know the Church age will never end, but what about the new converts?
The most damaging in my opinion is one of the notes in Rev 1:1, which is completely made-up madness:
(4) prophetic, as disclosing seven phases of the spiritual history of the church from, say, A.D. 96 to the end. It is incredible that in a prophecy covering the church period, there should be no such foreview. These messages must contain that foreview if it is in the book at all, for the church does not appear after Rev 3.22. Again, these messages by their very terms go beyond the local assemblies mentioned. Most conclusively of all, these messages do present an exact foreview of the spiritual history of the church, and in this precise order. Ephesus gives the general state at the date of the writing; Smyrna, the period of the great persecutions; Pergamos, the church settled down in the world, "where Satan's throne is," after the conversion of Constantine, say A.D. 316. Thyatira is the Papacy, developed out of the Pergamos state: Balaamism (worldliness) and Nicolaitanism (priestly assumption) having conquered. As Jezebel brought idolatry into Israel, Song Romanism weds Christian doctrine to pagan ceremonies. Sardis is the Protestant Reformation, whose works were not "fulfilled." Philadelphia is whatever bears clear testimony to the Word and the Name in the time of self-satisfied profession represented by Laodicea."
This Note virtually eliminates any rational interpretation of the book of the Revelation.
These are only a few in a blizzard of misdirections by Scofield to steer Christians away from New Jerusalem (the Church) and towards old Jerusalem (Israel.)
People believe this madness because Scofield wrote it. He is still a very powerful person because he had a lot of money and powerful people behind him in this effort, and still does. The latest version of the "Scofield Bible" is even more anti-Christian.
Dan