What you are wanting to do is disregard other scriptures, and only focus on the ones that seem to validate your OSAS doctrine, which has been the case from the beginning.
This is a wrong assumption on your part. I do not want to disregard other Scriptures. I love all Scripture and disregard none. Including the first half of Romans 6:23 and the last 1/4 of it. Heck, I love all of Romans. If there were any anti-OSAS Scriptures, I wouldn't think OSAS was accurate doctrine. I literally do not personally care one way or the other if OSAS is true or not. Although it does seem to me to not glorify Jesus if He looses some of His sheep. But since I do think OSAS is Biblical doctrine (including this thread's passage), I'll stick with it until proven wrong.
For example, if there were any Scriptures that said Judas was ever saved, you'd have a valid point. As it stands, however, there is no such Scripture. Plus, it's off-topic to this OP's focus.
Neither does 1 Cor 3:15 or 17 teach anti-OSAS. Which BTW, you didn't answer my question. Do you think "destroy" in 3:17 means to de-save someone?
As long as your "in" Christ Jesus, you have eternal life.
Where does the verse say "as long as you're in Christ Jesus"? Actually, Never mind answering that question as it's off-topic to the OP and we both know the answer anyway.
Which is why you quote only half the scripture and even misquote the half you do use.
Wrong assumption once again. That's NOT why I quote only half of Rom 6:23. The reason is that there's no debate on the first 1/2 nor the last 1/4. In fact here's the whole verse and I'll tell you what I think the last 1/4 implies in light of other Scripture:
Romans 6:23 (LEB) For the compensation due sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
John 8:34-36 (LEB) Jesus replied to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, that everyone who commits sin is a slave of sin. And the slave does not remain in the household forever; the son remains forever. So if the son sets you free, you will be truly free.
When I read "
in Christ Jesus our Lord" it seems to me all the more proof of OSAS, not less. That's the whole point/power of OSAS, is that it's all about GOD and glorifying Jesus. Your idea of anti-OSAS makes The Son out to be a loser, IMO. Some little l lord that not even capable of knowing whether Judas believed in Him or not from the beginning. When in fact He's Lord. But you don't even think Eternal Life is a Gift of God, so I doubt you'd believe that our Eternal Life is secure
in Christ Jesus or Lord, (versus our sin free lives), precisely because He is Lord.
But again, JB has asked that we stick to the 1 Cor 3 discussions (except where you all jump to Chapter 9, or elsewhere, of course).
You never quote that part of the scripture.
Wrong again. I do quote that part sometimes. But we are not debating that part of the verse. Nor have you ever explained how that part of the verse somehow means Eternal Life is not a gift of God's. I agree, the wages of sin is death. Does that somehow mean Eternal Life in Christ Jesus our Lord is not a gift of God's? No it doesn't.
What particular part of my post do you disagree with?
These parts:
Originally, 1.
Judas Iscariot is a good example of believing and following Him for a while.
and
2.
Those who believe for a while, are saved for a while.
Judas Iscariot is no more a good example of someone that was saved for a while than my dog is.
Are you saying Judas didn't believe for a while?
Yes that's what I'm saying and doing so because John (well after Jesus' death and resurrection and Judas' death too) recalls and records for us to read; Jesus saying that
from the beginning Judas didn't believe and would be the one who later betrays Him. Yes after following Him around and listening to Him speak (just as Satan did). But so what? This would have been a perfect time for John to have said; "Judas believed for a while and was saved for a while" but then betrayed Jesus. But, that's NOT what he recalls Jesus saying about Judas.