If we can strike and splice two different scriptures together, by ignoring part of one, and 99% of the other, the anyone could make a mockery of the bible, having it say what they want.[//QUOTE]
I've never done that, as everyone well knows.
But, let's examine what is SAID in both verses: "gift of God" in 6:23 and "gifts of God" in 11:29. So they are
directly connected by the subject of God's gifts.
6:23 is singular, and 11:29 is plural. Why? Because Paul described 3 specific gifts of God before he wrote 11:29. And 6:23 is one of them, which is eternal life. So eternal life is included in 11:29, and no one has shown otherwise.
Example:
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
It's by taking in the whole scripture and surrounding context, together with the rest of the scriptures that we find the whole truth.
Lining out "for the gifts and the calling of God are" in 11:29 is dishonest, as I've never excluded the FACT that 11:29 mentions the gifts of God. In fact, it is precisely because 11:29 mentions "gifts of God" that it is directly related and connected to 6:23.
We are not to try and build a doctrine off off one scripture, let alone a part of a scripture, and a part of another scripture, "spliced together".
JLB
Your claims are preposterous. And unsubstantiated.