farouk
Member
Re: What's this with not calling someone a LADY, if she has a tattoo (even faith base
for_his_glory:
Well, thank-you very much for your (as usual, it seems) very thoughtful post.
I understand that for you personally the giving of them might pose some dilemmas with some hypothetical clients.
It seems from what you say, though, that, however discreetly, you are definitely comfortable with asserting tattoo equality between men and women.
Blessings.
Here is the thing with opening a tattoo parlor is that you have to be versatile and flexible and knowledgeable in all areas of the various type of tattoos within it's artistry. Say you are a Christian running your own parlor, I do not see it being a successful business unless you compromise your faith and tat those things of Satan on someones body when requested to do so. I know there is a high percentage of those being a Christian getting tats, but not as high as those who are not in Christ. I have no problem with anyone getting a tat whether it be a man or a women and most tats reflect that of ones character or even emotion at the first, but then changes after the fact and are stuck with the choice they made if it can not be perfectly covered over by another tat. In some cases it is body art and in other cases it is a form of rebelling against something. A lady is a lady not by what we see on the outside, but that of their character.
for_his_glory:
Well, thank-you very much for your (as usual, it seems) very thoughtful post.
I understand that for you personally the giving of them might pose some dilemmas with some hypothetical clients.
It seems from what you say, though, that, however discreetly, you are definitely comfortable with asserting tattoo equality between men and women.
Blessings.