ezra
Member
:amenThe "different flavors" is a good point that I made on a similar thread at least a year ago.
Even when my entire Christian experience consisted of Campus Crusade and the Southern Baptist Church, I never heard anyone suggest that a decisive act of apostasy would not cut the cord. There probably are OSAS who hold that position, but I never heard it expressed. The OSAS position that I understood was more about the "liberating freedom" that one has by being saved - your sins, past and future, are forgiven. When you stumble, or even stray far from the path, you do not have to fear that your salvation is at risk. Even within in the camp of which I was a member, there was a sense that if you strayed far enough for long enough your original belief perhaps had not been sincere and you might want to rethink your salvation.
Likewise, the standard OSNAS position is not that one is first saved by believing but must now live the remainder of one's life trying to do enough "good works" to make the grade. It is, at least as I understand it, that one must simply continue to believe. Again, picking oneself back up when one stumbles and not committing a decisive act of apostasy. There are undoubtedly some OSNAS who emphasize the "quality" of one's works, but not really in the sense of earning salvation - more in the sense of demonstrating that one continues to believe.
In short, there are a lot of shades of gray, and it can be difficult to tell when OSAS blends into OSNAS and vice-versa. This is why the debate truly seems to me Much Ado About Nothing. If you took the polar extremes in each camp, which to some extent it does seem to be what surfaces again and again on these threads, you might have room for a "lively discussion," but certainly nothing that should cause someone to question whether someone else is saved. As Hermit keeps suggesting, it is difficult to read these threads and not see them as motivated by fear, anger and ego rather than any fruit of the Spirit.