Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
i agree with this statementI can see that they both have merit, one key vulnerability I see with the OSAS position is the assumption that all of the "believe" and "believe in His name" verses, such as those cited in the OP, refer to a specific point in time. One "believes," and that's that.
If the Bible does support diametrically opposed views, then the Bible has serious problems. I cannot accept that. The Bible is inerrant. Man is quite errant.No, it is a recognition that both positions have biblical support and that the "true" answer is far from clear, which is why biblical scholars of the highest caliber can be found to support each position.
Jesus was extremely clear in His teaching on eternal security. It's just that there are some who don't see it that way.The "black or white" approach to doctrine is a common one that, IMO, leads to more confusion and divisiveness than light.
What Lewis in no way was suggesting is that Jesus was all 3. Or even just 2. And your point only affirms my point, that between OSAS and OSNAS, only 1 view is biblically correct, and the other one is totally incorrect.This is famously seen in C. S. Lewis' statement that Jesus was either a "lunatic, liar or Lord." You must accept one of the three, Lewis said; only one can be true.
I reject such a "possibility".Everyone now realizes that this is fallacious because it does not include all the possible alternatives, such as "legend" (meaning the possibility that Jesus never existed at all)
Sure. What the blasphemous and infamous "Jesus Seminar" tried to do with Jesus. I'm not buying.that He existed but did not say many of the things attributed to Him, or that what He actually did say was not accurately reported decades after the fact.
How in the world could there be any other view regarding security? One is either secure, or not.I am not convinced that OSAS and OSNAS, as commonly understood, exhaust the possibilities.
I don't know what the quote marks around "true" mean. But if both are true, then the Bible is contradicted internally. Which I reject.I am not convinced that both are not to some extent "true."
This is just a statement; an opinion. What did Jesus say about those He gives eternal life? They SHALL NEVER PERISH. How could He have been any more clear?Moreover, OSNAS to some extent subsumes OSAS: The status one provisionally obtains when one repents and believes can later be lost.
Since that view denies the clear teaching of Jesus, I'd say rejection of His teaching would have a rather large impact (not positive) on such a one.Since whether I accept the OSAS or OSNAS position will have precisely zero effect on how I live my life, I do not regard the distinction as a Christian essential. It's sort of like Pascal's Wager: If I live as though OSNAS is correct, but OSAS is actually correct, what have I lost?
I don't view accurate doctrine as being "much ado about nothing". In fact, Paul wrote "I would not have you ignorant, brethren..." only 4 times in 4 different epistles. He certainly wanted his readers to understand facts and doctrines.(Not that I would have lived my life any differently if I had bet OSAS was correct, which is why I view the debate as mostly Much Ado About Nothing.)
Again, if that were true, then the Bible is internally contradicted, since Jesus was clear about WHEN one possesses eternal life from John 5:24, which is WHEN one initially believes, and then He said that those He gives eternal life shall never perish in John 10:28.The reality is, the OSNAS position has massive biblical support (as well as in the earliest Christian writings).
If there are any verses that actually out and out says that salvation can be lost, please share. So far, no one has come forward with such a verse. What is presented includes a lot of figures of speech, that can be taken a number of ways. But NOTHING plainly stated abourt loss of salvation.One cannot just keep citing the OSAS verses like a parrot and expect to convince anyone.
To quote further from this same link,Again without purporting to be a Greek scholar, I did find a good discussion of Greek tenses at http://www.ntgreek.org/learn_nt_greek/inter-tense.htm. The discussion emphasizes that, in Greek, the primary focus of tense is not "time" but rather "kind of action." The present tense is indeed associated with continuity - progressive or continuous action. Someone may want to address how the "believe" and "believe in His name" verses are to be understood in the Greek, a project that I decline to undertake.
I think my point was missed. The crux of the OSNAS group is that the present tense means the results of the present tense action must continue IN ORDER for the results to continue.The issue is not, as you suggest, "There is no sense that the present tense is used to indicate that the results of present or current action will continue ONLY AS LONG AS the current action continues." I am not talking about the current action of "belief" having immediate "results" that "continue" only as long as the "belief" continues and that will be "lost" if the belief does not continue.
The action is completed at the moment when one believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, that He died personally for him/her and gives eternal life to believers. Recall "having believed" in Eph 1:13 and the guaranteed results.I am talking about BELIEF ITSELF being the continuous action - there are no "results" to be "lost" unless and until that action is completed.
Who said the present tense for 'believe' requires this "continuous action". Go back to my link and re-read the underlined words.THERE SIMPLY IS NO BELIEF at all until the continuous action constituting "belief" is completed.
I used "bible study tools" on line for verses. The subjunctive mood is interesting. But the point about the subjunctive mood is that IF the action is completed, then the result is guaranteed.My words and highlights in blue.
True belief is the way, the truth and life of Christ. Not just in head, but in all thought and action.
Eggzacktly, Ezra! Well said! Thanks.eternal life is given the moment we get saved.. our true eternal life begins when God calls us home. or maybe i should say experience it to the fullest
Whatever you believe, will be you, as a gift to Christ.I said:
"FreeGrace said:
... So, what does the Bible say about it?
John 3:15 - that everyone who believes (present tense) may have (subjunctive) eternal life in him."
I used "bible study tools" on line for verses. The subjunctive mood is interesting. But the point about the subjunctive mood is that IF the action is completed, then the result is guaranteed.
So, from Jn 3:15, IF one believes, THEN one WILL HAVE eternal life. Which is what the present tense verses say as well.
I'm not sure what your question refers to. Could you clarify, please? Thanks.Whatever you believe, will be you, as a gift to Christ.
Ask yourself, "What other beliefs will I be bringing to the table?"
Whatever you believe, will be you, as a gift to Christ.
Ask yourself, "What other beliefs will I be bringing to the table?"
Whatever you believe, regardless if it is true or not, will be who you are. When it is time for your soul to bare itself to Christ, what beliefs will you have that is true; for only the true is of any value.I'm not sure what your question refers to. Could you clarify, please? Thanks.
My concern is that you do not think that you need to do anything else to be saved. But we still need to carry our cross daily. That is to repent our sins and ask for forgiveness, like Christ did, carrying his cross, for all sins on earth.
OK, thanks. I agree. For those who believe that salvation can be lost will bare that basically unbelieving soul to Christ, who promised everyone He gives eternal life that they shall never perish (John 10:28). Which they didn't believe.Whatever you believe, regardless if it is true or not, will be who you are. When it is time for your soul to bare itself to Christ, what beliefs will you have that is true; for only the true is of any value.
I'm happy to put that concern away. There is nothing else to be saved. Christ died for my sins personally and completely. And I believe that He gives me eternal life on that basis of belief, and He has promised those He gives eternal life that they shall never perish.My concern is that you do not think that you need to do anything else to be saved.
Yes, sir. God elected believers for service.But we still need to carry our cross daily.
I wasn't aware that Christ repented of sins and asked for forgiveness. Which text indicates that?That is to repent our sins and ask for forgiveness, like Christ did, carrying his cross, for all sins on earth.
Right.Luke 9:23-24
And he (Jesus) said to all, "If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will save it."
To lose one's own life (old man to sin) is to carry one's own cross daily. To carry the burdens of being wrong, humbled, repentance, making amends, doing right, etc.
There are only 3 possibilities regarding when a believer receives eternal life:
1. when they first believe
2. some time during their life on earth
3. at the end of their life, when they enter eternity
Some argue that 1 Peter 1:9 indicates that eternal life is received at the end of their life. "for you are receiving the end result of your faith, the salvation of your souls."
If salvation and eternal life are synonymous, and most would agree that they are, then we can't really view anyone as saved during their life on earth, if "end of your faith" is synonymous with "end of your life". But it should be quite obvious that the 2 phrases are not equivalent at all.
So Arminians cannot view themselves as saved during their life. And one cannot lose what one does not possess. So the argument about losing salvation becomes irrelevant.
Are there any verses that indicate that eternal life is given during some point after initially believing in Christ? No, there are not. So we can eliminate #2 and #3 straight off.
So, that leaves #1, when they first believe.
So, what does the Bible say about it?
John 3:15 - that everyone who believes (present tense) may have (subjunctive) eternal life in him.
This verse indicates from the subjunctive that not everyone will believe, but of those who do, they will have eternal life in them.
John 3:16 - For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes (present tense) in him shall not perish but HAVE (present tense) eternal life.
John 5:24 - “Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes (present tense) him who sent me HAS (present tense) eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life.
John 6:47 - Very truly I tell you, the one who believes (present tense) HAS (present tense) eternal life.
1 John 5:11 - And this is the testimony: God has given (aorist tense) us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
1 John 5:13 - I write these things to you who believe (present tense) in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you HAVE (present tense) eternal life.
What is clear from these verses is that those who believe possess eternal life. 1 John 5:11 clearly indicates that eternal life is something already given, by the aorist tense, which is generally a past completed action.
Finally, Jesus tells us that it is He who gives eternal life: John 10:28 - I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.
So, it's clear from Scripture that the gift of eternal life is given WHEN one initially believes. Not some time after that.
Therefore, one is eternally saved WHEN one believes in Christ.
Please explain the present tense of HAS and HAVE in the verses in the OP about WHEN one possesses eternal life.
In those verses, there is no mention of a promise of getting eternal life, but actually HAVING, or possessing eternal life.
Yet, Jesus was very clear about WHEN He gives eternal life; WHEN one believes in Him is WHEN they possess it.
And, He was very clear about those He gives eternal life. They shall never perish. John 10:28
So, is this a vote for #2?When he understands and begins to feed on the words of life.
Amen!eternal life is given the moment we get saved.. our true eternal life begins when God calls us home. or maybe i should say experience it to the fullest
Thank you for this great example of "explaining away" these verses.has the (promise)..............have the (promise)
Eternal life is a promise from God to all who will believe on the name of Jesus until He returns for His Bride. Many will fall away, 2 Thessalonians 2:3, losing the promise of eternal life with the Father.
2 Corinthians 1:20 For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.
John 3:15 may have, but does not say at the moment we believe (promise)
John 3:16 but, a conjunction that means will have and again says nothing about at the moment (promise)
John 5:24 conditional to the (promise)
John 6:47 conditional on believe has (promise) of eternal life
1 John 5:11 (promise) conditional in the life of Christ to all who will believe
1 John 5:13 (promise) have eternal life as long as one believes
Thank you for this great example of "explaining away" these verses.
However, since the verses are quite clear about presently possessing eternal life for those who believe, the claim that "says nothing about at the moment" is incorrect.
It absolutely does imply that one possesses eternal life the moment they believe, because that is what Jesus said: those who believe presently possess eternal life.
Now, the only legitimate opposition to the claim that eternal life is possessed the moment one believes is to provide just one verse that clearly and plainly teaches that Jesus gives eternal life sometime AFTER initial belief. Is there such a verse?
If not, and I propose that there are not, then we can rest assurred that at the moment of initial belief, one possesses eternal life.
i hear this all the time as the pastor was preaching this morning he mentioned how the churches was in competition against each other . instead of working together :amenbut we do see things differently based on our collective beliefs.