Interesting , I would like to read more info about that fact . Where did you learn that from ?
I don't mind spending some time speaking about the two key concepts in my statement, "
Five thousand years ago, men in the Hebrides knew nothing of true God. They only knew His creation by which they comprehended His manifest substance in the elements." That at least will provide a way to explain my other concept found in, "
And to this day where God is refused, the Hebrides can suddenly open another way up to you and the end of that will be total loss."
That latter statement is more insightful than may be easily visible.
But to give you my position.
I was an occult esoteric theosophist and when I was converted in 1984 I was finishing my writings that would have led to my setting up an Occult Order that had Satanic predications.
So to what that means then!
How do we know that the men and women who occupied the Hebridean Isles five thousand years ago, when the standing stones of Calanais were first erected, were incapable of knowing true God? And why speak of the
manifest elemental substance of creation? Why not speak of god's and so speak of pagan meanings as a point of reference to the Hebridean men and women five thousand years ago?
Many biblical scholars have given us a wealth of pagan names across the Euphrates River (Mesopotamia) the Nile River (Egypt) and the Indus River (Present day Tibet to Karachi). These names have been transported into almost every know pagan and occult practise throughout the known history of men and nations. And yet the dwellers in the Hebrides cannot be identified in that meaning easily. There are sources that speak of Princess Scota and Princess Scotia of Egypt in Irish chronicles dated to the 11 Century and assign the Scots people as having decent from her and those who came with her to Ireland and then (Scotland).
The
Lebor Gabála Érenn states that Scota was the Mother of
Geytholos (Goidel Glas) the eponymous ancestor of the Gaels. Goidel's Mother was the daughter of an Egyptian pharaoh named Cingris, a name found only in Irish legend. She married Goidel's Father Niul, son of
Fénius Farsaid (identified as a son of
Gomer) a Babylonian who traveled to Scythia after the collapse of the
Tower of Babel. Niul son of Fénius returned to Babylon as part of an effort to study the confusion of languages. He was a scholar of languages and was invited by Pharaoh Cingris to Egypt to take Scota's hand in marriage. Scota and Nuil's son, Goídel, is said to have created the Gaelic language by combining the best features of the 72 languages then in existence. In Fordun's early Scottish version, Gaythelos, as he calls Goídel Glas, is the son of "a certain king of the countries of Greece, Neolus, or Heolaus, by name", who was exiled to Egypt and took service with the Pharaoh, marrying Pharaoh's daughter Scota. The
Lebor Gabála Érenn describes him as a
Scythian. Wikipedia.
The key point (as explained in the Wikipedia citation) about this legend, is that both Babel (Mesopotamia) and Egypt are included by marriage. In the case of the express Scottish source then it is Egypt and Greece. The other characteristic is that the lineage is cited as patriarchal but grounded in a matriarchal meaning. This is important because almost all occult claims that have their source in pagan traditions cite the matriarchal lineage as more important than the patriarchal. Even though cultural meanings express patriarchal headship. The distinction is chiefly a spiritual predication that has to do with least resistance to demonic powers by the female.
Just to express my own reasons for posting about revival and in particular the Hebridean Revival of 1949-52.
The reason is because the Hebrides are a very clear example of a spiritual reality that exposes what revival means as witnessed by its participants (see video at Page 1 (one) post 5 (five)). It is also the witness of the decades that follow revival that explains what happens when the hand of God is removed. I believe that this fact explains a great deal of our troubles today because revivals have taken place in all parts of the world.
So to this part of my claim (from above)
I don't mind spending some time speaking about the two key concepts in my statement, "Five thousand years ago, men in the Hebrides knew nothing of true God. They only knew His creation by which they comprehended His manifest substance in the elements." That at least will provide a way to explain my other concept found in, "And to this day where God is refused, the Hebrides can suddenly open another way up to you and the end of that will be total loss."
That latter statement is more insightful than may be easily visible.
The reason why I expressly cited myself to yourself as, "
And to this day where God is refused, the Hebrides can suddenly open another way up to you and the end of that will be total loss" is because I am not concerned by what pagans or occultist do - I am concerned by what believers do. You could say my burden is for the Church and not the world. The saying may have seemed like a warning about pagans refusing the gospel - but it is in truth a profound reality in speaking about an effect that many believers are fallen into due to the time in which we now live. It is that meaning that is often expressed as apostasy and by others as carnality. Both precepts have substance but I was deeply burdened by the Holy Spirit when I was converted out of the occult and into Christ - for the churches. And I should say I knew almost nothing of what that concern would entail or where it would lead. What I did know was that the Father had his answer to the condition which has become so visible by now that it is almost a given understanding by many believers who have endured its meaning and groaned due to their own flesh and the ill effects of many churches. It is revival that lies at the heart of the answer of God - but it is also preserving the sheep after the hand of the Lord has passed over.
As to the other matter of the Indus Valley meaning - that is best explained separately if needed.
Rhomphaeam