D
DivineNames
Guest
AVBunyan said:
If you don't want to share your (alleged) spiritual wisdom with me, well I guess I will just have to live with that.
Christian Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
-
Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
-
-
Depending upon the Holy Spirit for all you do?
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
-
-
How are famous preachers sometimes effected by sin?
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
-
If you don't want to share your (alleged) spiritual wisdom with me, well I guess I will just have to live with that.
D
DivineNames
Guest
JM said:
Well this is an argument against determinism-
H
Humble Servant
Guest
I respond: I believe when examining the bottom line, you are attempting to argue for man’s free will. Scripture proves the opposite…….man is naturally born of the flesh, flesh is opposed to the Spirit, cannot discern or believe spiritual concepts, let alone pick up his cross and follow the true Christ.
You have offered no biblical proof whatsoever that there is one event taking place in Heaven, Hell or earth in which the Lord was not the prime mover or the direct cause of all the infinite secondary causes.
If man’s days are numbered, i.e., predetermined --- from the second, minute, hour, day, week, month, year and century of his birth, to the second, minute, hour, day, week, month, and year of his death --- it is impossible that the Lord is not in control and governing literally every event in a man’s life. Certainly specific events --- be it disease of unknown cause, healthy or unhealthy lifestyle, car crash, drug use, random murder by being in the wrong place at the wrong time, suicide, genetic predisposition to fatal disease, etc., etc., etc., ---- are events which must, of necessity, be in God’s control for Him to number man’s days. To that you will surely agree. But these drastic events are all the result of an infinite array of secondary causes. Change one minutia and a different outcome would take place.
By using the lesser example of the birds of the air who are governed by God, the Lord proves the greater, that Christians, who are of infinitely more value to the Lord, are under His total watch care and concern.
The Lord knoweth the days of the upright as well as the wicked. (Psalm 37:18 ff).
He knows their days because He decreed them, and all that is contained therein.
Drew, your argument implies, as it does with all Arminians, the wish to live ‘free’ from the rule of Christ, the Governor of the Universe. However, that is impossible. The Christian prayer, “Our Father who art in Heaven………THY WILL be done on earth, as it is in Heaven,†implies ALL aspects of our lives, day in and day out.
Why does the Christian wish for the Lord to overrule his life?
Because the Lord is wiser than the Christian and knows what is best for the Christian to achieve the ends for which the Christian was created.
Drew, I pray you freely and willingly submit to the sovereign rule of Christ in your daily life, leaving nothing out of His control. I pray the Lord’s will for your life be done. Amen.
When you have done so, please report back regarding the new, improved and biblical view of your Lord and God, as well as your relationship with Him.
D
DivineNames
Guest
JM said:
The author appears to be taking the second horn of the Euthyphro dilemma. Yes, if you are willing to do that, God can do anything at all and it is "good" by definition. It would be a contradiction for God to have done something evil.
The problem is that the "goodness" of God becomes completely meaningless.
(The author does mention God's "nature", which may actually result in the first horn, (and damage what he is saying), but it is clear enough I think that the author is taking the second horn of the dilemma.)
D
DivineNames
Guest
JM said:
If you take the second horn of the Euthyphro dilemma, then there is nothing to stop God from being a liar. Indeed, it would be perfectly good for God to be a liar!
So God may have lied to the Christians. God may not be sending you to heaven, he may actually intend to burn you all in hell!
JM, if God burns you in hell after having lied to you, would God be perfectly good? Would the torture of millions of Christians for ALL ETERNITY be for the "glory" of God? His righteous judgment?
D
DivineNames
Guest
Humble Servant said:
A Biblical argument has been put forward against determinism-
Drew
Member
You say that I have not offered proof that God has not pre-determined all events and I agree. I think that this is an impossible request and that you are effectively in the same position. You claim that certain texts support this strong form of determinism but the case does not seem conclusive-as per the example of the birds. The text simply does not state that the fate of each bird is determined by God. It only allows one to conclude that the birds cannot fall "apart from the will of God". What this text is effectively saying is that "things are not so free that they will interfere with the will of God". In order for your interpretation to be the only valid one, you need to make the case that God has a specific will in respect to each bird. And I have not seen this yet.Humble Servant said:
The reality, in my view, is that the texts that Calvinists (and Arminians for that matter) use to "make their case" are simply not as unambiguous as they believe. I think it is clear that basic process works as follows:
Calvinist (C) approaches Text (T) with an interpretive bias that leads him to resolve the inherent ambiguity in the text in the direction of a Calvinist reading.
Arminian (A) approaches the same Text (T) with a different interpretive bias that leads him to resolve the inherent ambiguity in the text in the direction of an Arminian reading.
Perhaps you can show me one text that unambiguously speaks in support of any of the 5 points of TULIP.
Are you referring to Job 14:5?Humble Servant said:
"Man's days are determined;
you have decreed the number of his months
and have set limits he cannot exceed."
I will tentatively agree that this text states that the number of days we each live is pre-determined by God. As an aside, I am not sure why this text cannot be interpreted as follows: God determines the number of days of a man'slife by making a "run-time" decision (excuse the computer terminology), a decision is taken by God as that man's life unfolds, not necessarily in advance. However, on balance, I do think the wording from the NIV suggests the "pre-determination" that you speak of. It would be interesting to study the original Hebrew.
In any event, your statement "change one minutia and a different outcome would take place" has not been adequately defended. For example, if I choose to drink tea instead of coffee tonight, how do you know that this "free" choice will not change the number of days that I will live. It is entirely possible that it will have no effect on that whatsoever. I think the most easy path is to conclude that if our days are pre-determined, all the details of our lives are also pre-determined. However, this is not the only solution. Like the chess analogy, God may be able to work things out so that Fred lives 35,117 days and yet not control everything that Fred does.
When I encounter a solid case for God pre-determining all events in the Universe, I will certainly stand corrected.Humble Servant said:
DivineNames said:If you don't want to share your (alleged) spiritual wisdom with me, well I guess I will just have to live with that.
I have no spiritual wisdom of me but..... these folks did - check them out...
http://av1611bible.com/links/puritansites.htm
God bless 8-)
D
DivineNames
Guest
AVBunyan said:
How about you explain why it is OK for God to make people sin, and then torture them for all eternity for having done so?
You are trying to run away from the issue.
H
Humble Servant
Guest
Roman Catholic “Divine Names†has used an argument against Predestination taken verbatim from a Roman Catholic website, The Catholic Treasure Chest.
Perhaps not every reader of this thread is aware that orthodox Catholicism repudiates and curses the biblical doctrine of Predestination. Thus, the Roman Catholic Church Magisterium teaches and preaches Arminianism.
This unbiblical view of God and man is typically the view held by most of so-called ‘Evangelical Christianity.’
Thus, Evangelical Christianity and Roman Catholicism are, at their core, brothers and sisters, united by the same ‘spirit,’ and under the rule of the same ‘father.’
By the authority of the Council of Trent, Section 16, Fruit of Justification, I quote:
In par. 5, the Roman Catholic Church argues against the biblical doctrine of the Total Depravity of man.
In par. 17, the Roman Catholic Church argues against the biblical doctrine of Predestination, as well as its sub-doctrines which include Unconditional Election by God’s sovereign grace.
Perhaps not every reader of this thread is aware that orthodox Catholicism repudiates and curses the biblical doctrine of Predestination. Thus, the Roman Catholic Church Magisterium teaches and preaches Arminianism.
This unbiblical view of God and man is typically the view held by most of so-called ‘Evangelical Christianity.’
Thus, Evangelical Christianity and Roman Catholicism are, at their core, brothers and sisters, united by the same ‘spirit,’ and under the rule of the same ‘father.’
By the authority of the Council of Trent, Section 16, Fruit of Justification, I quote:
In par. 4, the Roman Catholic Church argues for the Arminian view of man’s cooperation and agreement with the Spirit, while repudiating the biblical doctrine of Irresistible Grace.
In par. 5, the Roman Catholic Church argues against the biblical doctrine of the Total Depravity of man.
In par. 17, the Roman Catholic Church argues against the biblical doctrine of Predestination, as well as its sub-doctrines which include Unconditional Election by God’s sovereign grace.
D
DivineNames
Guest
AVBunyan said:
Really? Then I would say that Christians shouldn't pay much attention to you. By your own admission, you don't have any spiritual wisdom.
AVBunyan said:
How would you know?
If you don't have any spiritual wisdom, we shouldn't trust you with regard to who does. :D
D
DivineNames
Guest
Humble Servant said:
Where the argument comes from isn't that important. Can you answer the argument?
D
DivineNames
Guest
JM said:
Not all of it actually. The last time you sent me to a link, it didn't have an answer.
So if you think there is an answer to this point then please explain.
Drew
Member
Since these doctrines are claimed to be Bibical, perhaps someone can actually show that this is the case. I do not mean to be flip, and I realize that a lot of work may be involved, but I think an objective reading of numerous threads on this topic will show that the Calvinist case has not really been made in respect to such doctrines.Humble Servant said:
Perhaps there is a strong case for the Calvinist position, but it has not appeared in these forums. In defense of the Calvinists, I suspect that a real case would require complex and lengthy arguments that are simply too demanding to make "on one's spare time". Same deal with an Arminian defence - the issues are complex and the reality (in my view) is that for either side to make a real case would be a momentous undertaking - after all, people have argued about this for centuries.
I want to be clear - I am very sympathetic to an Arminian position. However, I would never want to claim that the case can be made by "listing some verses". Things are not that simple, IMHO. We need to look at sweeping themes of the Scriptures - themes that are not encapsulated in individual verses.
We also need to look at the "data of life". This kind of statement is an anathema to those who think "it's about the Bible and nothing but".
Let's take "total depravity". I found the following from Wikipedia. Whether it is a fair statement of one aspect of this doctrine, I will leave to the opinion of those who hold it:
"The doctrine of total inability teaches that people are by nature not inclined to love God with their whole heart, mind, or strength, as he requires, but rather all are inclined to serve their own interests over those of their neighbor and to reject the rule of God. "
I have bolded the part of interest to me. I think that it is a manifest fact of life that unredeemed people do engage in selfless acts (at times). Of course, one can always say that their underlying motivations are selfish. I do not know about your lives, but I can think of plenty of examples of loving and selfless acts, performed by the unredeemed.
My point? The world of personal experience clearly shows that the unredeemed are not totally depraved - they do bad and good. I cannot ignore what my experience has shown me.
DivineNames said:
Now you are playing games - If I said I had spiritual wisdom then you may have aaccused me spiritual pride :-? -
I was seeking to be sincere and serious and you still mocked my intentions.
Within that simple link contained much insight to who those men are.
Did you even check out the link? I don't expect you to read it all but something there may catch your attention.
God bless
H
Humble Servant
Guest
The literature available to sincere truth-seekers which prove the doctrines of grace is staggering. By the Lord's sovereign decree, we live in the Age of the Information Superhighway. To remain ignorant of the fact that all your questions and arguments have been soundly answered in both ancient and modern times leaves me inclined to believe you are engaging in debate simply to hear the sound of your own voice as it echos in the empty minds of those who share your lackluster love of eternal truth.
You have to keep in mind, I responded "so what" when the open theist/UR folks claimed God was the author of sin. I don't remember saying God was the author of sin, I'm asking YOU to prove why it matters.
If God is the first cause/first mover, then how did God not decree sin, how did it come into existance?
lol
Read the link.
If God is the first cause/first mover, then how did God not decree sin, how did it come into existance?
lol
Read the link.