Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Women in the Pulpit

Man have we debated about this on this board over the years a million times. It seems to me that God does choose woman to preach, because many of them can preach driven by the Holy Ghost. Why ? Because they were ordained by Jesus to do so. Many customs have changed' the role of the women has changed' Paul also said a women should cover their heads when in worship' Why ? Because that was the custom of those days. Women have been leaders in the Bible and can't nobody tell me any different' check out the Old Testament. First of all you had Queens' and people like Deborah who had authority to tell men what to do. Men who believe that God only gives them authority are called ( Hierarchical Complementarians ) and if you want to read a good article on this and the women who had authority in the Bible old and new. I am posting it below. I had to put this in 2 post new Testament in second one.
Lewis

Bible Women with Spiritual Authority

This article is also available in Spanish here.​
Spiritual authority is a difficult concept to define comprehensively;[1] however it is closely linked with hearing from God and being commissioned by God for ministry and service. Hierarchical Complementarians are Christians who believe that it is only men, and not women, who have been given spiritual authority by God in the church and in the family.[2]
Complementarians believe that as the spiritual authorities, it is the men who need to seek God’s will and guidance on behalf of the church community. They believe that it is only male ministers who have the spiritual authority to hear from God in order to minister from “the Word†in a public church meeting. Complementarians believe that in the family, it is the husband who has direct authority from God, and it is the husband who has the final word on any decisions. They see the husband as the mediator of God’s will to the wife, who does not have direct spiritual authority herself.
In contrast to what Complementarians believe, the Bible contains several accounts where God bypassed husbands and male guardians and spoke to women directly with messages of vital significance. Where God did not speak personally, he sent angels. This article will look at a few of these women whom God entrusted with spiritual authority – Bible women who acted without the permission or protection of men.
OLD TESTAMENT WOMEN
Samson’s Mother (Judges chapter 13)
In Judges chapter 13 there is a narrative where the Angel of the LORD[3] reveals God’s plan for Israel’s deliverance to an unnamed woman. This unnamed woman was married to man named Manoah, and yet the Angel entrusted God’s plans and instructions to the woman. The Angel told the woman that she would bear a special son, and her son would deliver Israel from the Philistines. The Angel gave the woman instructions about her diet and told her never to cut her son’s hair.
The woman told her husband about her encounter. Manoah, the husband, wanted to hear the instructions for himself so he asked God to send the man of God again, to teach them how to bring up the child (13:8). God answered his prayer, but again the Angel appeared, initially, to the woman. The woman ran to get her husband. When Manoah met the Angel, the Angel repeated what he had said previously to the woman:
“Your wife must do all that I have told her. She must not eat . . . .She must do everything I have told her.†(13:13-14, my emphases.)
Clearly God fully trusted the woman to obey and follow these instructions without her husband’s permission or help!
Furthermore, the woman recognised from the beginning that the messenger “looked like an angel of God, very awesome†(13:6); but Manoah did not realise that the messenger was an angel until he offered a burnt sacrifice and the Angel of the Lord ascended in the flames and disappeared (13:17). Terrified, he said to his wife, “We are doomed to die, we have seen the Lord.†The woman prudently replied, “If the Lord had meant to kill us he would not have accepted the burnt offering.†Throughout this narrative the woman shows herself to be delightfully discerning and sensible.
Deborah (Judges chapters 4-5)
No list of women with spiritual authority would be complete without Deborah who was the leader of Israel at some point in their history. Judges chapters 4 and 5 records Deborah’s leadership and does not mention that there was anything peculiar about her being both a leader and a woman. In fact, her gender does not seem to have been an issue at all! Deborah was married, but the Bible mentions nothing at all about her husband, apart from his name: Lappidoth (4:4).
In Judges chapter 5 we read that prior to Deborah’s leadership: “village life in Israel had ceasedâ€(5:7), “the roads were abandoned†(5:6) and Israel had chosen false gods (5:8). The clear implication is that Israeli society became more civilized, safer and more god-fearing because of Deborah’s leadership.
Deborah was an excellent and versatile leader. She was a prophetess (4:4,14), a judge (4:5) and a military leader (4:6-10). Deborah’s prophetic insight was accurate and she showed decisive leadership in military matters.
Complementarians have unfairly speculated that Deborah became a leader because there were no men capable of the task. However the scriptures are clear that Israel was not without male leaders at that time. Judges chapter 5 mentions leaders (5:2-3), nobles (5:13), princes (5:2, 9, 15) and warriors. Moreover it is evident that Deborah encouraged other leaders in Israel, and that these leaders had great confidence in her leadership. [More about Deborah and the "no available men" argument here.]
In comparison with the other judges mentioned in the book of Judges, who were all men and mostly flawed, there is not one negative word said about Deborah; yet Complementarians still assert that leadership and spiritual authority is for men only. Rather than seeing Deborah as a scriptural precedent for women in leadership ministry, they dismiss Deborah as an anomaly. This stance of the Complementarians is myopic and unjust, because Deborah was clearly an outstanding and respected female leader blessed by God.
Other Old Testament Women
The Wise Woman of Abel Beth Maacah:This woman was clearly a person of influence, possibly even the leader of the fortified town of Abel Beth Maacah in Israel. As a civil leader in Israel, this women, like Deborah, would also have had a degree of spiritual authority. Through her wise use of authority and peaceful persuasion she rescued her town from being destroyed by Joab,[4] the commander of King David’s army. (See 2 Samuel 20:14ff esp v22).
(Joab and David had no problem with heeding the good advice of women. Joab knew that David listened to women,[5] so when he was unsuccessful in persuading David about a certain cause of action he asked the Wise Woman of Tekoa to help him (2 Sam 14ff). The Wise Woman of Tekoa is a different person to the Wise Woman of Abel Beth Maacah. “Wise Woman†may in fact be a leadership title and not just a descriptor. Wise women may have functioned as living repositories of wisdom and lore passed on orally.)
King Lemuel’s Mother: Proverbs 31:1-9 contain the words of an oracle (prophecy) of King Lemuel’s mother. This woman taught her son – a grown man and a king – this oracle. Her inspired words have been recorded in Scripture for other kings to learn from. [More on King Lemuel's mother here.]
Huldah: When Josiah, King of Judah, wanted to learn more about how to worship God, he sent a delegation to a woman – to the prophetess Huldah (2 Chron 34:19-33).
Linda L. Belleville (2004:113) writes:
The size and prestige of the embassy that sought her counsel indicates something about not only the seriousness of the situation but also Huldah’s professional stature: the High Priest (Hilkiah), the father of the future governor (Ahikam), the secretary of state (Shaphan) and the king’s officer (Asaiah). Huldah’s counsel was immediately heeded, and sweeping religious reforms resulted (2 Kings 22:8-20; 23:1-25).
The Wailing Women: During the dark days of Judah’s apostacy, when deception was rife (Jer 9:4-6), the only people who listened to God and the prophet Jeremiah were some women. God gave the skilled wailing women a message and he authorised them to proclaim this message in his name. (See Jeremiah 9:17-22.) [More on Wailing Women here.]
A Shunamite women came up with the inspired idea of building a small room to accommodate the prophet Elisha. Her perception, initiative and generosity brought great blessing to her, to her husband and to her son. When reading her story in 2 Kings 4:8-37 we can see that this woman had spiritual insight and fortitude. The Shunamite woman, and not her husband (4:23a), displayed and used spiritual authority for the benefit of her family.
Hannah is clearly the main protagonist in the narrative of 1 Samuel chapter 1 where she prays for a child, vows to give that child back to God to be employed in Tabernacle service, and then fulfills her vow. Hannah’s husband, Elkanah, is portrayed as loving and supportive. Elkanah trusted in his wife’s decisions and actions, and complied with them. Apart from 1 Samuel 1:19b, it appears that Elkanah did not mediate or intervene in this situation at all. Furthermore, Hannah’s prayer in 1 Samuel 2:1-10 is part of Holy Scripture, and has the spiritual authority of Scripture.
 
NEW TESTAMENT WOMEN
Mary the Mother of Jesus (Luke 1:26-38)
Most Bible scholars believe that Mary was a young teenager when she was visited by the angel Gabriel. Despite her age and her gender, God sent the angel directly to Mary with the message that she had been chosen for the wonderful role of being the mother of the Messiah. Mary would have been under the protection of a guardian, who was very likely male, and she was betrothed to a man named Joseph, yet the angel Gabriel took God’s word directly to this teenage girl.[6]
If the Complementarian concept of male authority is valid, one would assume that Gabriel would have visited the patriarch of Mary’s family with the news; especially considering the ramifications of the remarkable and potentially scandalous situation Mary would soon find herself in.
Mary’s humble compliance with God’s extraordinary calling on her life is exemplary.[7] Moreover Luke recorded Mary’s faith-filled song of praise, often called the Magnificat, in his gospel (Luke 1:46-55). These words of Mary have the authority of Holy Scripture.[8]
Mary Magdalene (Mat 28:9-10; Mark 16:9-11; John 20:17-18)
It is difficult to overestimate the significance of the fact that the first person to see Jesus alive after his crucifixion was a woman. Did Mary just happen to be at the right place at the right time for this monumentally momentous meeting with the newly risen Jesus, or was it a divinely appointed encounter?
I believe that it is no coincidence that the first person Jesus saw after his resurrection – at the dawning of the New Covenant – was a woman. Jesus’ act of redemption and his inauguration of the New Covenant brought equality for all people, regardless of gender; and with equality, the real possibility of affinity and harmony between the sexes – reversing the divisive affects of sin.
At their meeting, Jesus authorises and entrusts Mary with certain messages for his disciples, who as yet still believed that their Lord and friend, along with their hopes, was dead.
Mary Magdalene went to the disciples with the news: “I have seen the Lord!” And she told them that he had said these things to her” (John 20:18).
Jesus had no problem authorising and entrusting his marvellous message, that he was alive, to a woman. This extraordinary commission has led the Eastern Orthodox Church to call Mary Magdalene “the apostle to the apostles”.
Martha (John chapter 11)
Martha has been unfairly maligned by some because of just one incident (Luke 10:38-42); however Martha made some very astute statements of faith concerning Jesus and eternal life recorded in John chapter 11.
Martha answered, “I know he [her deceased brother Lazarus] will rise again in the resurrection at the last day.” John 11:24
“Yes, Lord,” she told him, “I believe that you are the Christ,the Son of God, who was to come into the world.” John 11:27
This second statement is very similar to Peter’s recorded in Matthew 16:15-17:
“But what about you?” he [Jesus] asked. “Who do you say I am?”
Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven.”
Jesus states that Peter could not have known that he was the Christ, the Son of God, unless God the Father had revealed it to him. Likewise, Martha’s faith statements could only have come by divine inspiration.
Martha and her sister Mary of Bethany were devoted disciples of Jesus. Jesus allowed Mary of Bethany to anoint him and prepare him for burial (John 11:2). We hear nothing about their brother Lazarus’s faith in the Scriptures even though, in John 11:5 it says, Jesus loved Martha and her sister and Lazarus. Here Martha’s name appears significantly first. Martha was a woman of great faith and spiritual acuity. [More on Martha and Mary of Bethany here.]
Other New Testament Women
Since Pentecost, God has communicated personally with his people more freely, primarily through the agency of the Holy Spirit. When Peter quoted Joel’s prophecy on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2, he made it clear that spiritual abilities, in particular prophecy, were now freely available to both men and women, to the young and to the old (Acts 2:17-18).
The Holy Spirit gives his gifts and abilities without apparent regard to gender (1 Cor 12:4-11), including the gifts of leading and teaching (Rom 12:6-8). Even Complementarian Mary Kassian (1990:168) observes, “There is no evidence in the Bible that gifts are assigned by gender. While it is true that [male] elders may possess gifts of teaching, administration, and pastoring, it is equally true that women possess these identical gifts.”
In fact, several women are mentioned by name in the New Testament who functioned as church leaders and ministers: Priscilla (with Aquila), Chloe, Nympha, Phoebe, Junia (with Andronicus), Euodia and Syntyche, etc. [For more about these women see the links below.]
Conclusion
Mary Kassian, and other Complementarians, have actually recognised that women tend to hear from God more than men, and yet they maintain that it is the men who have the spiritual authority in the church and home.[9] When I read the arguments of Complementarians, I get the sense that they do not have confidence in the abilities of women. They seem worried that society will crumble if women take more initiative or move outside of certain restrictive roles which they erroneously claim have been instituted by God. It seems that Complementarians have overlooked the Biblical examples where God used and blessed courageous women for his purposes, often in vitally important situations which had widespread ramifications.
From the Scriptures, we can clearly see that God does not speak solely to men and husbands, even in matters that directly affect them and their families. God can and does entrust his word – with the authority it entails – directly to women and wives. God can and does speak to women without using husbands and male church leaders as mediators. All believers have direct access to God through Jesus and his Holy Spirit, and vice versa.
http://newlife.id.au/equality-and-gender-issues/bible-women-with-spiritual-authority/
 
a queen in in medio-persia had no power, she was just a wife of the king. clout yes but not a co ruler or possessing a throne.
 
Maybe its these new translations maybe its a fox in the hen maybe its my King James Bible but there's no maybe about these verses..

I Timothy 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

Did Gloria Steinhem start this or has this been an ongoing debate throughout the centuries?

tob
 
Timothy 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

The phrase "usurp authority over" is translated from the single Greek word "authenteo". Like most other words in most languages, it can have a number of meanings, but "usurp authority over" isn't one of them. It can mean "exercise authority" or "govern", but not "usurp". As surprising as it may seem, the original meaning was to murder. From this original meaning, a number of other meanings were derived, such as to exercise authority, and to be the author or originator of something. Many think that it is this last definition that Paul had in mind, and that the verse should read "I do not allow the teaching that women are the origin of men", or something along those lines. But why would Paul say such a thing? It doesn't seem to make any sense.

There was a cult in Paul's time that taught that God was a woman (i.e. a goddess) and that she created the woman first and then the man. They also believed that it was the man that was tempted and brought sin into the world by committing the first sin. Sound familiar? It should. There's a similar teaching that's quite popular today. It's called feminist theology. So, let's look at the verse again, this time with this alternate translation of "authenteo".
I do not allow the teaching that woman is the origin of man. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not decieved, but the woman.
You know, I've always found those verses hard to understand. What does the order of creation have to do with authority. In many cases, the greater power comes into existence after the lower power. For example, the first states had governors before the US had a president. That was always a difficulty for me, until I heard of this possible alternate translation. Now it suddenly makes sense. Paul wasn't talking about authority (although he does elsewhere), but about a specific cult which had taken the Biblical account of creation and turned it on it's head.
 
yes I know that but that doesn't support a godly view of women in authority.

esther didn't have that power under artaxerzes., she also had to risk life to even enter the throne room. yet she is godly example of, using one place for gods glory. while im not suggesting a return to that. but reba, handy is right. I have seen that to the case generally. can women teach? yes but why is it that when men are effimmitate society is well whacky? when men fail to lead the home the marriage and society falters?

if a woman can preach and have that type of authority over men can you tell me why paul says in titus

that a deacon must be a man of one wife?
 
Esther was a queen, sorta like in name only no power of her own. A woman very much under the authority of God.... Awesomely used of God but she was not in authority over man/men... She did as her uncle instructed she did it very well :)
 
in order for my wife to pastor me and teach me. it would only have to massive revalation from god that she knows more about the bible in such a manner that I would yield. for the record I have been under a female pastor. I know both sides of the argument.
 
And I know handy will say the same thing.

Yes, or at least if the woman pastor herself doesn't have issues, the church she pastors in most likely does.

This is an area of legitimate debate among Christians. There are plenty of texts that show women in authoritative positions that seem to balance out what Paul said about women not holding authority in the church.

After years of studying the issue from both sides, I've come to firmly believe that women can and should exercise all their gifts within the body... but under the authority of male leadership.

Yes, the Roman church was to do all that Phoebe asked of them... but this was at the direction of Paul, an apostle. So, she was acting under male authority.

Yes, Priscilla was a gifted teacher of the word, very possibly a better one than Aquila, but it seems pretty clear that she didn't teach Apollos alone, that Aquila was there with her.

The daughters of Philip were prophets, but the fact that they are referred to as "the daughters of Philip" seems to indicate that they prophesied under the authority of their father. Anna was also a prophet, but she placed herself under the authority of the priests in the Temple.

Even when Mary Magdalene and the other women discovered the empty tomb, their first response was to go to Peter, the de facto leader of the disciples with Jesus being gone. When Jesus revealed Himself to Mary as being resurrected from the dead, He told her to the disciples. John 20:17

Looking over all the women of the New Testament, it's hard to find a clear example of an authoritative woman who was acting upon her own authority.

There is the issue of Junia, but she is spoken of just in passing and the language in the original makes it hard to determine whether or not she herself was an apostle or just closely associated with Andronicus. It may very well be that she operated much the same way as Priscilla, preaching, teaching, making decisions, but under the headship of her husband. At any rate, without further information about Junia, it's impossible to know and it's never a good idea to push doctrine on the basis of obscure mentions, when there is clear teaching elsewhere.

I think these examples show that women certainly can preach the word, work within the church, be an evangelist... just under the authority of male leadership that's all.
 
Christ is the head of the church

Christ is the husband

The church is the bride

The Godly order of authority is there. Marriage has always been a shadow, a picture of Christ and His church.....

Accepting the order and seeing the picture opens a lot of understanding
 
1 Timothy 2 YLT
<sup class="versenum">11 </sup>Let a woman in quietness learn in all subjection,
<sup class="versenum">12 </sup>and a woman I do not suffer to teach, nor to rule a husband, but to be in quietness,
<sup class="versenum">13 </sup>for Adam was first formed, then Eve,
<sup class="versenum">14 </sup>and Adam was not deceived, but the woman, having been deceived, into transgression came,
<sup class="versenum">15 </sup>and she shall be saved through the child-bearing, if they remain in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety.

Personally I do not think this scripture has anything to do with women teaching in the Church. The whole context is a in relationship to husbands and wives.
 
I think these examples show that women certainly can preach the word, work within the church, be an evangelist... just under the authority of male leadership that's all.


I think I would agree with this statement as I understand it.

So I have a question, who has more authority in the Church, a pastor or the elders?
 
So I have a question, who has more authority in the Church, a pastor or the elders?

I've always believed that a church should have a group of elders who shepherd the sheep... the pastor being one of them, but, just one. That's one thing I've always thought the Orthodox Presbyterian Church had right.
 
1 Timothy 2 YLT
<sup class="versenum">11 </sup>Let a woman in quietness learn in all subjection,
<sup class="versenum">12 </sup>and a woman I do not suffer to teach, nor to rule a husband, but to be in quietness,
<sup class="versenum">13 </sup>for Adam was first formed, then Eve,
<sup class="versenum">14 </sup>and Adam was not deceived, but the woman, having been deceived, into transgression came,
<sup class="versenum">15 </sup>and she shall be saved through the child-bearing, if they remain in faith, and love, and sanctification, with sobriety.

Personally I do not think this scripture has anything to do with women teaching in the Church. The whole context is a in relationship to husbands and wives.

If we look at the whole context of 1 Timothy, not just this section of chapter 2, Paul is speaking of teaching and authority within the context of the church. Chapter 1 deals with the fact that there were many false teachers and ... if not false teachers, then just kind of ignorant teachers... in Ephesus at the time Timothy went there to pastor. Then, Chapter 2 starts out with a call to prayer for all men in authority, including kings...

Chapter 3 then begins with very specific instructions as to who is qualified to be an overseer of a church.

Truly, the whole letter is written to give Timothy, a young man who was being sent to one of the more troubled churches as it's pastor, instructions on how to lead the church.

So, while it looks as though the instruction about women in 1 Timothy 2 is regarding the home, I think that it needs to be placed in the greater context of the letter Paul was writing to Timothy, which was specifically about how to administer a church in a godly way.
 
So I have a question, who has more authority in the Church, a pastor or the elders?

I've always believed that a church should have a group of elders who shepherd the sheep... the pastor being one of them, but, just one. That's one thing I've always thought the Orthodox Presbyterian Church had right.

Acts 20 does mention a plurality among the pastors and teachers who as elders oversaw at Ephesus.
 
Back
Top