Would you be disapointed to find a Hindu in Heaven?

[bibleberean]

Here is what was posted...

"Would you be disappointed to find a Hindu, Buddhist, Moslem, Catholic, New Ager, skeptic, communist or liberal in Heaven?

Or would you be glad to see that God's favor included the heathen?"

The fact is God is not going to let anyone into heaven unless they are saved...

I don't want to give my opinion... I want to give scripture...

Romans 4:3 "For what saith the scripture? ...."

You can see how seriously some of the posters in this forum take this question. They are arguing that there is another way to God and God will save the heathen outside of "believing the gospel".

This leads to ecumenical confusion...

Pope praying with the heathen...

Look at the confusion and false teachings these kind of things lead us to...

When Mother Teresa died, her longtime friend and biographer Naveen Chawla said that he once asked her bluntly, "Do you convert?" She replied, "Of course I convert. I convert you to be a better Hindu or a better Muslim or a better Protestant. Once you’ve found God, it’s up to you to decide how to worship him" ("Mother Teresa Touched Other Faiths," Associated Press, Sept. 7, 1997).

I am not going to be a party to speading false doctrine hypothetically or otherwise...

1 Peter 4:11 If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God; if any man minister, let him do it as of the ability which God giveth: that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

How does speculation on a false gospel and salvation glorify God?

For His glory,

Robert

 

[DivineNames]

Look what word up in the dictionary?... Am I supposed to read your mind? :-?

In the previous post to you, which word was I talking about a "dictionary definition" of?

I don't think you would have to be psychic to know the word in question is "promotion".

 

[DivineNames]

That, to quote Father Ted, is an ecumenical matter.

drink!...! girls!

(to quote Father Jack)

What is wrong with the word "feck" ?

 

[Orthodox Christian]

Here is what was posted...

"Would you be disappointed to find a Hindu, Buddhist, Moslem, Catholic, New Ager, skeptic, communist or liberal in Heaven?

Or would you be glad to see that God's favor included the heathen?"

The fact is God is not going to let anyone into heaven unless they are saved...

The fact is YOU do not know who is saved. YOU cannot tell God that they will or should be denied either, for he will show mercy upon whom He will show mercy.

I am reminded of the story of Jonah, where Jonah became angered because God showed mercy on some people Jonah deemed not worthy.

I don't want to give my opinion... I want to give scripture...

Romans 4:3 "For what saith the scripture? ...."

Finish that thought: Avraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness. This occured before there was Torah, before the Incarnation, before the scriptures.

Ghandi believed Christ's teachings on certain matters, but disbelieved Christianity because, at least in part, of the horrible witness of Christianity in his part of the world. Shall he suffer eternally because of obnoxious racists?

You can see how seriously some of the posters in this forum take this question. They are arguing that there is another way to God and God will save the heathen outside of "believing the gospel".

I take God's mercy VERY seriously. I take His statutes and judgements eriously in my own life. Get it straight: Judgement begins with the house of God, not with 'them.' I'm inclined to look to the example of Paul, Avraham, and Moses when it comes o passing judgement- not Caiphas.

This leads to ecumenical confusion...
Pope praying with the heathen...
Look at the confusion and false teachings these kind of things lead us to...

When Mother Teresa died, her longtime friend and biographer Naveen Chawla said that he once asked her bluntly, "Do you convert?" She replied, "Of course I convert. I convert you to be a better Hindu or a better Muslim or a better Protestant. Once you’ve found God, it’s up to you to decide how to worship him" ("Mother Teresa Touched Other Faiths," Associated Press, Sept. 7, 1997).

Supposedly Protestants believe in an individual relationship with God and the leading of the Holy Spirit- for themselves. When it comes to others, apparently they need to be spoon fed Churchianity from the North American WASP. "Just accept Jesus" is their gospel- which is NOT the gospel, nor is it what Christ taught. He taught His disciples and those with ears to follow Him. This means much more than a pledge card.

IF God is who He says He is, I needn't change anyone else or 'convert' them- what a condescending notion.

 

[bibleberean]

That, to quote Father Ted, is an ecumenical matter.

drink!...! girls!

(to quote Father Jack)

What is wrong with the word "feck" ?

The word has multiple meanings. I was curious so I typed the word in my browser and decided it was a "cuss word".

It was an arbitrary decision made on the spur of the moment... 8-)

 

[bibleberean]

God has plainly declared that those who have not recieved His son will not be in heaven!

I don't care what unscriptural crock of garbage people come up with to refute this clear, biblical fact.

John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

That may be too complicated for some... :roll:

 

[bibleberean]

The Horrendous Fruit of Mother Teresa’s False Gospel

The following is quoted from David Clouds Way of Life Literature

December 7, 1999 (David W. Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061-0368, fbns@wayoflife.org)

"My wife and I conducted a taped interview with Sister Ann, a nun who worked with the Missionaries of Charity in Kathmandu. The interview was conducted November 23, 1984, at the Pashupati temple area (the same place mentioned in the Indian newspaper article above). Ann was overseeing the feeding and medical attention of the destitute and elderly who live there, waiting to die by Nepal’s holiest river, the Bagmati. As Hindus, they believe that if they die in this "holy" place, especially if they die with their feet in the water, they might be freed from the cycle of reincarnation as taught in the Hindu religion.

Pashupati is considered the holiest place in Nepal. It is a large area, at the center of which is a temple containing a massive golden bull. This temple is considered so "holy" that non-Hindus are forbidden to enter it. The temple complex is covered with unspeakably vile idols of Shiva and other Hindu gods, and the people who are attended by the Missionaries of Charity pray to these gods.

The complete interview with Sister Ann is reprinted in my book Evangelicals and Rome, which is available from Way of Life Literature. Following is a brief excerpt:

BRO. CLOUD: Do you believe if they [the Hindus at Pashupati] die believing in Shiva or in Ram [Hindu gods] they will go to heaven?

ANN: Yes, that is their faith. My own faith will lead me to my God, no? So if they have believed in their god very strongly, if they have faith, surely they will be saved.

BRO. CLOUD: Do you believe there are different heavens? Like one for them and one for us?

ANN: No, there is only one heaven.

BRO. CLOUD: Why do you do this work?

ANN: Because we serve God in them. We find God in the midst of the suffering. The human society has thrown them out, so they are like in a despair, so we serve God in them.

Bibleberean adds:

All men do not have God dwelling in them.

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Although we are all God's offspring we are not all God's children.

 

[bibleberean]

Hindu Beliefs
From: Hinduism Today, April 1993

On Paths to God: "Man is free to choose his form of worship, for all paths lead ultimately to God." Sin is only of the mind; Soul is pure.


Mother Teresa and some other allegged Christians may believe something along these lines.

"Of course I convert. I convert you to be a better Hindu or a better Muslim or a better Protestant. Once you’ve found God, it’s up to you to decide how to worship him" Mother Teresa

This is not what the Lord Jesus Christ taught...

Matthew 7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:

Matthew 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

John 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

There is no salvation outside of Christ...

Acts 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.

 

[Soma-Sight]

Finish that thought: Avraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness. This occured before there was Torah, before the Incarnation, before the scriptures.

Ghandi believed Christ's teachings on certain matters, but disbelieved Christianity because, at least in part, of the horrible witness of Christianity in his part of the world. Shall he suffer eternally because of obnoxious racists?

I think I love you man.... :angel:

Seriously, you really know how to express the same things I think in a better manner than I do.

This is a critical point you have just uncovered. That of the life of Gandhi...

You have a man that for his WHOLE life is under the steel toe oppression of the Bristish Empire. This Empire viewed Gandhi's own people as lower than dirt and probably used Christian missionaries to show them their "low self worth" through the Gospel". I could see it now, a preacher in fine linen telling poor and sickly Indians that they are children of wrath and that their whole way of life was sick and evil.... (all the while British troops are killing any dissenters). So you have Gandhi, who seeing the FRUITS of this supposed predominantly Christian nation, turns his head in disgust to this "religon" that is being pressed upon his suffering people. Would you choose any differently? But lets not forget that the WAY OF LIFE THAT GANDHI LED WAS MORE "CHRISTLIKE" THAN ANY OF THE BRITISH "CHRISTIANS" THAT WERE ENSLAVING HIS PEOPLE.

So are we to believe that Gandhi will be condemed for acting the way he did? Of course we are not the judge on the matter but using a bit of "Christlike" logic and reasoning will lead us to the conclusion that ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS in relation to which Master you serve....

The ego, desire, selfish "satanic attitude" warned of in scripture

or the Heavenly, obedient, Truthful path that TRANSCENDS cultural boundaires showing love to all regardless of social stature through the power of Christ

I believe Gandhi was a disciple of the latter EVEN IF HE DIDNT GET THE SEMANTICS RIGHT!

 

[Soma-Sight]

Supposedly Protestants believe in an individual relationship with God and the leading of the Holy Spirit- for themselves. When it comes to others, apparently they need to be spoon fed Churchianity from the North American WASP. "Just accept Jesus" is their gospel- which is NOT the gospel, nor is it what Christ taught. He taught His disciples and those with ears to follow Him. This means much more than a pledge card.

IF God is who He says He is, I needn't change anyone else or 'convert' them- what a condescending notion.

That is very wise indeed.

If Jesus as God is Saviour, He doesnt need any "browbeaters" throwing stones at other people because they have "accepted" Jesus as it is mandated by a particular Church group.

He works on the hearts of men I believe. Rejecting that Love that pulls your soul to the Light is what True rejection of Jesus is. This can be made manisfest in actions such as shunning a starving man at your feet, or hitting your kid, or putting money before your relationship with your Creator, or being a coward when you could save someone from suffering.....

Accepting Jesus as Saviour is more than a verbal confession to a Church building.... it is a WAY of life that is full of TRUTH and LIGHT.

 

[bibleberean]

Supposedly Protestants believe in an individual relationship with God and the leading of the Holy Spirit- for themselves. When it comes to others, apparently they need to be spoon fed Churchianity from the North American WASP. "Just accept Jesus" is their gospel- which is NOT the gospel, nor is it what Christ taught. He taught His disciples and those with ears to follow Him. This means much more than a pledge card.

IF God is who He says He is, I needn't change anyone else or 'convert' them- what a condescending notion.

That is very wise indeed.

If Jesus as God is Saviour, He doesn't need any "browbeaters" throwing stones at other people because they have "accepted" Jesus as it is mandated by a particular Church group.

He works on the hearts of men I believe. Rejecting that Love that pulls your soul to the Light is what True rejection of Jesus is. This can be made manisfest in actions such as shunning a starving man at your feet, or hitting your kid, or putting money before your relationship with your Creator, or being a coward when you could save someone from suffering.....

Accepting Jesus as Saviour is more than a verbal confession to a Church building.... it is a WAY of life that is full of TRUTH and LIGHT.

What? Are you a Hindu?

You don't believe in preaching the gospel of Christ?

What bible are you reading? :-?

Hindus do not believe in Jesus Christ and they worship false gods. What is wrong with you?

Jesus said:

Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Was Jesus throwing stones?

So, do you agree with Mother Teresa?

Naveen Chawla, her longtime friend and biographer Naveen Chawla once asked her bluntly...

"Do you convert?" She replied, "Of course I convert. I convert you to be a better Hindu or a better Muslim or a better Protestant. Once you’ve found God, it’s up to you to decide how to worship him" ("Mother Teresa Touched Other Faiths," Associated Press, Sept. 7, 1997).

Love is not helping people to stay in idolatry. Love is sharing the gospel of salvation not helping people who are on their way to a Christless eternity to stay in their sins and idolatry.

That is not love that is a sin against God and His commandments.

This statement is a crock...


"IF God is who He says He is, I needn't change anyone else or 'convert' them- what a condescending notion."

bb responds:

We don't need to convert the lost?

We don't need to contend for the faith?

Jude 1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

Was Paul wrong?

Acts 19:8 And he went into the synagogue, and spake boldly for the space of three months, disputing and persuading the things concerning the kingdom of God.

It pleases God to preach!

1 Corinthians 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

1 Corinthians 1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.

1 Corinthians 1:20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

1 Corinthians 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

I don't know what bible you read but my bible says we need to preach the gospel and give a reason for the faith that is in us.

 

[Orthodox Christian]

Supposedly Protestants believe in an individual relationship with God and the leading of the Holy Spirit- for themselves. When it comes to others, apparently they need to be spoon fed Churchianity from the North American WASP. "Just accept Jesus" is their gospel- which is NOT the gospel, nor is it what Christ taught. He taught His disciples and those with ears to follow Him. This means much more than a pledge card.

IF God is who He says He is, I needn't change anyone else or 'convert' them- what a condescending notion.

That is very wise indeed.

If Jesus as God is Saviour, He doesn't need any "browbeaters" throwing stones at other people because they have "accepted" Jesus as it is mandated by a particular Church group.

He works on the hearts of men I believe. Rejecting that Love that pulls your soul to the Light is what True rejection of Jesus is. This can be made manisfest in actions such as shunning a starving man at your feet, or hitting your kid, or putting money before your relationship with your Creator, or being a coward when you could save someone from suffering.....

Accepting Jesus as Saviour is more than a verbal confession to a Church building.... it is a WAY of life that is full of TRUTH and LIGHT.

What? Are you a Hindu?

You don't believe in preaching the gospel of Christ?

What bible are you reading? :-?

Hindus do not believe in Jesus Christ and they worship false gods. What is wrong with you?

Jesus said:

Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Was Jesus throwing stones?

So, do you agree with Mother Teresa?

Naveen Chawla, her longtime friend and biographer Naveen Chawla once asked her bluntly...

"Do you convert?" She replied, "Of course I convert. I convert you to be a better Hindu or a better Muslim or a better Protestant. Once you’ve found God, it’s up to you to decide how to worship him" ("Mother Teresa Touched Other Faiths," Associated Press, Sept. 7, 1997).

Love is not helping people to stay in idolatry. Love is sharing the gospel of salvation not helping people who are on their way to a Christless eternity to stay in their sins and idolatry.

That is not love that is a sin against God and His commandments.

This statement is a crock...


"IF God is who He says He is, I needn't change anyone else or 'convert' them- what a condescending notion."

bb responds:

We don't need to convert the lost?

We don't need to contend for the faith?

Jude 1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

Was Paul wrong?

Acts 19:8 And he went into the synagogue, and spake boldly for the space of three months, disputing and persuading the things concerning the kingdom of God.

It pleases God to preach!

1 Corinthians 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

1 Corinthians 1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.

1 Corinthians 1:20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

1 Corinthians 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

I don't know what bible you read but my bible says we need to preach the gospel and give a reason for the faith that is in us.

I am confident that you have access to a Greek lexicon, Bibleberean. Consult the Greek terms for each of the above verses, and you will see that 'preaching' 'persuading' and 'disputing' are all from Greek terms that mean dialogue and persuasion, not name calling and accusation.

Love is indeed sharing the gospel of Christ, not beating people to a pulpit by calling them disciples of Satan. Your particular style of preaching reaches no one but offends many, Bibleberean. It is easier to win a city than one man offended.

I don't convert anyone. These people are not children or retarded, Bibleberean. I demonstrate and share truth as God enables, but it is God who changes a heart, and the man (or woman or child) who changes their mind.

Converting someone makes them a member of a cult. Reaching out to them makes them part of your family. The Church is a family.

As for "contending for the faith:" Clearly, we contend for the faith among those who claim to have said faith. My contention is not with the "lost," but is with those who beat upon them. I alsio contend with them who would undermine the authority of the Church, just as I would contend with any who would encourage my children in rebellion (by 'contend' I mean rebuke and, if necessary and left with no other recourse, smite).

For it is the kindness of God that brings men to repentance. It is only when we come to know Him that we also get to know his severity. Some of you would lift up the severity of God to infants who have not yet been born, when clearly wisdom instructs us to nurture the babe and discipline only those who are maturing.

Parenthetically: If you would hop off your hobby horse of how the message should be packaged for a moment and read what Soma Sight wrote, you would see that Soma fundamentally embraces who and what Christ is, even if the style of Soma's presentation is at variance with your particular style.

 

[bibleberean]

I am not advocating beating people to a pulp and the excuse makers in this forum know it.

I am for preaching the gospel and telling the truth in love.

The bible has a clear message...

Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Some people may not care that those who believe not will be damned.

I am not one of those.

People that are not saved are not welcomed into the Kingdom of God.

Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Harsh words aren't they...?

The sugar coated manure some foist in this forum is not love. It is perfumed excrement...

The gospel is to be preached and believed.

Those who want to argue against this point do not have a scriptural leg to stand on.

1 Thessalonians 2:2 But even after that we had suffered before, and were shamefully entreated, as ye know, at Philippi, we were bold in our God to speak unto you the gospel of God with much contention.

 

[bibleberean]

Would you be disapointed to find a Hindu in Heaven?

There will be no disapointments in heaven.

Heaven is a perfect place and there is no pain or suffering there...

Revelation 21:4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

Hindus worship false gods and will not be in heaven.

1 Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,


Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

People who worship false gods will not be in heaven.

I am anxious to read the scriptural arguments that those who believe in the false gods of the Hindu religion will be in heaven...

I am waiting with "baited breath"...

 

[jess321]

that's what i said!!!! great minds think alike!!! hehehe j/k

 

[Vic C.]

Ghandi believed Christ's teachings on certain matters, but disbelieved Christianity because, at least in part, of the horrible witness of Christianity in his part of the world. Shall he suffer eternally because of obnoxious racists?

I question Ghandi's reasons for rejecting Christ in the first place. He could have embraced Messiah and preached against what he believed were the errors of the Christians ways. Instead, he played the 'hypocrisy' card and rejected a Faith in and of Christ.

But lets not forget that the WAY OF LIFE THAT GANDHI LED WAS MORE "CHRISTLIKE" THAN ANY OF THE BRITISH "CHRISTIANS" THAT WERE ENSLAVING HIS PEOPLE.

And... ? When did God institute a grading curve?

I am confident that you have access to a Greek lexicon, Bibleberean. Consult the Greek terms for each of the above verses, and you will see that 'preaching' 'persuading' and 'disputing' are all from Greek terms that mean dialogue and persuasion, not name calling and accusation.

This is not my Forum, but as a Moderator, I'd like see where BB resorted to name-calling and accusations in the post in question.

 

[bibleberean]

that's what i said!!!! great minds think alike!!! hehehe j/k

I must agree... Great minds think alike...

I have to be honest... it's biblical... :D

 

[bibleberean]

Vic wrote:

"This is not my Forum, but as a Moderator, I'd like see where BB resorted to name-calling and accusations in the post in question."

BB responds:

I would like to see it too...and I am a moderator in this forum. :D

 

[Orthodox Christian]

I am not advocating beating people to a pulp and the excuse makers in this forum know it.

So now we have the understanding that those who disagree with and find fault with your presentation of scripture are "excuse makers."

BTW I said "pulpit."

I am for preaching the gospel and telling the truth in love.

The bible has a clear message...

Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

Yes, the message is proclaim the GOOD NEWS of the Kingdom of God. Thereis no command given to go tell all the Hindus they are going to hell. That's not GOOD NEWS- that's presumptive, premature judgement.

Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Some people may not care that those who believe not will be damned.

I am not one of those.

I again commend to your use a Greek lexicon. The term that your KJV translates 'damnation" is katakrino. This is a familiar compoud to those of us who read Greek: kata means against or negative; krinos means 'judgement. He who does not believe shall be judged against. Note the time frame of 'shall be?' It is future tense. Hold your horses, this ain't the White Throne and you are not on the Seat.

In fact, the very same term katakrina is used in this scripture:
Rom 2:1

Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.

Ain't that a wake up call to the 'saved.'

People that are not saved are not welcomed into the Kingdom of God.

Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Harsh words aren't they...?

So are these:

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

The sugar coated manure some foist in this forum is not love. It is perfumed excrement...

The gospel is to be preached and believed.

Those who want to argue against this point do not have a scriptural leg to stand on.

1 Thessalonians 2:2 But even after that we had suffered before, and were shamefully entreated, as ye know, at Philippi, we were bold in our God to speak unto you the gospel of God with much contention.

The astute observer will note that the "you" to whom the gospel was spoken was the Church. The bible is given through the Church and to the Church. It is a witness of true faith and worship by which we live, a sword which cuts through all that would entangle us. It is not a bludgeon by with to smite the heathen.
1 Thess 2:7 But we were gentle among you, even as a nurse cherisheth her children

I have not a scriptural "leg" to stand upon: I have the whole corpus. Word to the wise: warning and damning are not the same activity.

But by all means, keep on serving up your excrement-scented excrement.

 

[bibleberean]

"Yes, the message is proclaim the GOOD NEWS of the Kingdom of God. Thereis no command given to go tell all the Hindus they are going to hell. That's not GOOD NEWS- that's presumptive, premature judgement."

Really?

Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Should we rip out these verses in our bibles?

How about this one?

John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.