20. From my viewpoint, you have everything backward, because of some twisted idea that you read into the scripture. [[LOL! That's what I was talking about in my conclusion. You took the words right out of my mouth!]]
21. I've already said numerous times that salvation and eternal life is a free gift from God, and God gives it to those with zero merit. [[No, that is what I & GW say; what YOU say is that God elects [unconditionally = forces] only some to get saved. You misrepresent what you both say and imply.]]
you abjectly misrepresent what I say
22. You have yet to explain that nonsensical idea of "non-meritorious condition of cooperating with God's grace". [[This is why I said maybe GG can explain it better, because to me it makes perfect sense and I don't see how to say it any simpler. IOW, IMO YOU are illogical and have the burden of proof.]]
Your logic is so poor that you can't even explain it.
23. "Sour 16"?? You have the burden to prove that any scripture is sour to a true believer. It seems to me that you don't understand what you're talking about. You don't understand TULIP. [[You prove the 16 are sour IYO by kicking against their goad. Methinks YOU do not understand TULIP, but here is mine:
T – total depravity, meaning souls are unable to exercise sufficient MFW to seek salvation.
Read Rom. 3:10-18, as it applies to every unregenerate soul, which included everyone (you and me both) before spiritual regeneration. Eph. 2:1-3 also applies. But of course you don't believe this, because you think you came up with the worthiness to be saved by your "cooperation." That is, your operation in conjunction with God's grace made you saved. This is a merit model.
U – unconditional election, meaning that souls need not satisfy a divine requirement such as faith or repentance, but God chooses to save some while damning the rest to hell.
Rom. 5:6 - Christ died for the ungodly, not for those who think they merit eternal life.
Rom. 4:5 - And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness.
But of course, you reject this, because you think salvation comes to those who merit it by "cooperation."
L – limited atonement, meaning that Christ died to pay the penalty of sin only for elect souls.
I already quoted Rev. 5:9 - "For You were slain, and have redeemed us to God by Your blood out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation" - but of course, you don't believe this either, because your bias prevents you from accepting the plain language of scripture.
I – irresistible grace, meaning that elect souls cannot resist or refuse God’s will for them to be saved.
If God Himself has never confronted you, then I can see why you can't believe that God would do such a thing. According to your theology, God is a "gentleman" who wouldn't force anyone to do anything, because He's too "nice." I think you have a rude awakening coming. That nice, gentle Jesus you believe in said, "fear Him who can destroy both your body and soul in gehenna." I assert that God does make people fear Him; but since you don't believe that, perhaps you'll be lulled to spiritual sleep.
P – perseverance of the saints, meaning that the elect cannot repudiate their salvation and commit apostasy, because God perseveres in keeping them saved.
Again, 1 Pet. 1:5 - "we are kept by the power of God through faith for salvation..." But then, you don't believe this either, since you believe in keeping yourself safe.
"Free will" is a fantasy that people think they have, in order to maintain a false sense of security for themselves, imagining that they are in control of their eternal future. When a person doesn't believe that God is the one in control of their eternal future, they think they don't have to fully trust Him for it. Their only option, then, is to trust in their own ability to obey God's commands all their life, which is what the apostle Paul opposed in saying things like this: "that I may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own, but having a righteousness that comes by faith in Jesus Christ."
So, "moral free will" is something that applies only to those already born again, wherein their will has been freed from the bondage of sin. This is what Rom. 6 is all about. And if a born-again Christian has been freed from the bondage of sin, then such a person cannot return therein, because their experience of peace with God is far too precious to them to throw it away on ungodly behavior that leads to apostasy.
But according to your responses, it appears that you believe in traditional ideas rather than what scripture actually says.
24. It doesn't matter what my bio is, or yours. [[It does if yours includes being brain-washed to believe TULIP.]]
25. Even the terms in TULIP are not really contributive to the actual doctrines taught by Reformed Theology, and taken out of context can be easily misconstrued. [[You may have just indicated the main disconnect in our entire discussion, because I am not talking about Reformed Theology, but only about TULIP.]]
Your idea that the tulip model is not Reformed Theology is wrong. The remonstrants came up with the acronym in order to oppose it, because they could not accept the idea of free grace. You need to carefully read The London Baptist Confession of 1689, and see that the tulip model is taught there, as well as The Westminster, Belgic, and other confessions.
With that revelation, are we suddenly simpatico?
Not sure what you mean by this. But if you keep on misrepresenting what I say, I'll stop responding to you.